Posts

jeffa4444 · Feb 12, 2014

The Canon 6d may not have the sophisticated AF system of the 7d (I have both) but the picture quality from its Sensor & Digic 5+ processor is far superior.
In low light the 6d excels and Ive yet to encounter any real world problems with the 11 point AF system (the 7d having 19 which are all cross type whereas the 6d only has a centre cross type)

Im sure Canon will replace the 7d in 2014 and at this stage no one knows its specification but if it were me I would not bother repairing the camera if its expensive.

Khufu · Feb 12, 2014

Online reviews seem fine with 'em, I may be ordering me a 70D soon so shall keep everyone informed... another Bank Transfer for Further Discount job - good stuff!

Also, like ProCameraShop, they appear to have floating prices which go up and down between the same two figures every week or two. I assume this is a marketing thing but the 70D's currently ~£640 with bank transfer discount - was ~£626 a week or so back and I assume it will be again...

I requested an invoice, been offered it for £626 and not yet paid for it but the online price has risen since - wondering if they'll still do me the cheaper price

Don Haines · Feb 12, 2014

anthonyd said:
Hello, I was wondering if anybody has real life experience (and photos to back it up) with a superzoom compact camera. I was looking at the latest announcements by Sony at dpreview and could help wonder if a 24.5 - 1550mm equivalent lens that is smaller (and cheaper) than a full frame 50mm could possibly produce anything decent.

Put another way, if I were to go on a trip to Alaska, or Yellowstone tomorrow and couldn't afford a canon 600mm or bigger (let alone the trash-can size and weight) would it be worth it to grab a superzoom that has a reach of 1000+ equivalent? (not necessarily the Sony ones mentioned).

Please don't start a discussion on image stabilization, or the small sensor size and its effects on IQ. I'm well aware of all that. I'm asking about the lens, so assume we are taking a picture of a grizzly bear, or a bird, who's standing still, on a very bright day, with the camera on a tripod.

I suggest you look at this thread....

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=19470.msg366042#msg366042

(Forum - Gear talk - Powershot - 200X Zoom on SX50)

Viggo · Feb 12, 2014

JPlendPhoto said:
Thank you all.
So the Sigma 35mm 1.4 seems to be a very popular lens, its just the focus is not alwasy perfect. It seems like a better option image quality wise that the canon from what i have read, also the price!

Ok can somone explain to me what this AFMA everyone is talking about? I see it mentioned a lot!

It's Auto Focus Micro Adjustment. It means every camera and lens are produced inside of certain tolerances regarding precision. But if you lens and body are focusing at the same end if that tolerance, it causes the focus to be in front or behind the point you focus on, a small mismatch. Newer camera bodies have the ability to adjust for this, to force the lens to focus where the camera body locks. This results in you getting sharp focus at the exact same spot the camera tells you when it shows focus is locked.

Canon Rumors · Feb 12, 2014

HTML:

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15839"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15839">Tweet</a></div>
<p><em>New Pocket-size PowerShot ELPH 150 IS, PowerShot ELPH 140 IS and PowerShot ELPH 135 Digital Cameras Feature High-Quality Optics, Outstanding Performance and HD Video Capabilities</em></p>
<p><strong>MELVILLE, N.Y., February 11, 2014 – </strong>Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions, announces the addition of three new versatile and high-performance PowerShot digital cameras to its ELPH lineup. The ultra-compact PowerShot ELPH 150 IS, PowerShot ELPH 140 IS and PowerShot ELPH 135 digital cameras are ideal for capturing sharp, high-quality images and video.</p>
<p>Each new PowerShot ELPH digital camera features a powerful zoom lens and image sensor combined with the DIGIC 4+ Image Processor providing clear, crisp and vivid images. In addition, all three cameras are equipped with a dedicated movie button, allowing users to quickly capture meaningful memories in 720p HD video.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Canon’s new PowerShot ELPH digital cameras are designed with ease-of-use in mind, enabling users to enhance their photography through a series of intuitive features. In Smart AUTO mode, each camera will analyze the scene at-hand and select the optimal camera setting. ECO mode can reduce battery consumption by dimming and eventually turning off the LCD screen when not in use, helping to increase the number of shots and time capturing video in-between charging cycles. In addition, the convenient Help Button offers a quick and easy way to uncover the potential of each camera by explaining the functionality of various settings and features.</p>
<p>“These new PowerShot ELPH cameras are ideal for those individuals who realize that their everyday moments are worth capturing on a dedicated digital camera that delivers stunning image quality,” said Yuichi Ishizuka, executive vice president and general manager, Imaging Technologies & Communications Group, Canon U.S.A.</p>
<p><strong>PowerShot ELPH 150 IS digital camera </strong>

The PowerShot ELPH 150 IS digital camera is equipped with an impressive 10x optical zoom lens and 20.0 megapixel sensor, enabling users to capture photos with outstanding image quality. In addition, this digital camera features Intelligent IS – a setting that automatically chooses from eight different modes to help optimize image stabilization based on various shooting conditions.</p>
<p>The PowerShot ELPH 150 IS digital camera will be available starting in February for a retail price of $149.99 in a variety of colors – blue, red, silver and black.</p>
<p><strong>PowerShot ELPH 140 IS digital camera</strong>

The PowerShot ELPH 140 IS digital camera also delivers high-quality imaging capabilities with a powerful 8x optical zoom lens and 16.0 megapixel sensor. Like the PowerShot ELPH 150 IS, the PowerShot ELPH 140 IS digital camera features Intelligent IS mode helping to make shooting both simple and intuitive.</p>
<p>The PowerShot ELPH 140 IS digital camera will be available starting in February for a retail price of $129.99 in two colors – gray and red.</p>
<p><strong>PowerShot ELPH 135 </strong>

Also featuring an 8x optical zoom lens and 16.0 megapixel sensor, the PowerShot ELPH 135 digital camera offers stunning imaging capabilities at a budget-friendly price.</p>
<p>The PowerShot ELPH 135 digital camera will be available starting February for a retail price of $119.99 in black, silver, red and purple.</p>

tron · Feb 12, 2014

privatebydesign said:
tron said:

privatebydesign said:

tron said:

privatebydesign said:

tron said:

It seems logical that a new model would be named G2 X and not G1 X II...

Click to expand...

Not if Canon follow the nomenclature they have followed for many years if they really do consider the G1X a pro tool, which they have always said they do.

Click to expand...

That's quite a ... pro tool ;D

Click to expand...

The G10 was used by a lot of pros. But here is what Canon say about the G1X

The Pinnacle of PowerShot.
Bright, fast and more creative than ever: advanced technologies come together for an exciting new camera that moves beyond anything the G-Series has seen before. The PowerShot G1 X digital camera will inspire advanced amateurs who have embraced the G-Series to explore new realms of photographic expression, and give pros an excellent camera that complements their creative demands.

Click to expand...

Just pointing out that whilst G2X makes some sense, so does G1X II, it isn't like we haven't had a 5D MkII, and MkIII, and a 1D MkI, and MkII, and MkIII and MkIV is it?

Click to expand...

Yes, but I do not think there is a comparison. We had all the G cameras with increasing numbers after all. Anyway the naming scheme is not important, they can make it whatever they want as far as the new specifications satisfy...

Click to expand...

In what dimension does G1X follow G12?

Who said such a thing? Dreaming? Is it so hard to think that since there were G1, G2, G3, etc cameras they could very well be G1X, G2X, G3X, etc... Sorry if I didn't express the obvious thought even more clearly...

tron · Feb 11, 2014

dstppy said:
tron said:

dstppy said:

tron said:

Which lens was it and how much did you get?

Well 1K euros is not bad but it is less than half the price of 5D3. No complaints though, this is what I want

Click to expand...

$400 for the EF-S 10-22mm Yeah, I'm paring down the list of stuff I have before adding to it again with a 5Dmk3. I still have the 70-300, 60mm and the 15-85. Then the 60D, 7D and 5DmkII. I have way too much stuff

Click to expand...

10-22 is a very good lens! Don't you need to cover this range? Or you have (or plan) a 16-35 with FF?

Will you sell all APS-C related before going full ... FF ? (pun intended )

Click to expand...

Yeah, getting rid of the APS-C stuff. I'm not convinced that the 7DmkII won't be a must-get as well.

Once I had it, I couldn't figure out why I needed an ultra-wide. If I need something, I'd probably go to a prime. Selling the lenses and bodies is more of an exercise in self-control than anything. I'll probably get a 300mm or 400mm prime but I want to stop adding to the pile of things I have (and re-invest the cash).

It isn't difficult if you visualize your next gear

bradfordswood · Feb 11, 2014

Has anyone on here used Magic Lantern on a 60d?

I'm specifically curious if, and how, the AFMA works. Also curious how the process of installing ML went.

Thanks in advance!

Dholai · Feb 11, 2014

PBD and all others,

Thanks for your time.

I think I found the solution, what you both suggested.

Cordless flash setting for Sekonic in one hand , ST-E3 -RT on the other hand, 600 RTs in there respective places with one as main light and meter just the way I meter my strobes.

Will try it outdoor and see if I can make it work.

BTW, it will be used with a 1Dx

Thanks again

Dholai

Morlin · Feb 11, 2014

Received my RRS TVC-34L tripod today together with the Wimberley gimbal head and some other stuff. Got one word... WOW! =)

The weekend seems so far away now!

Thank you again for your advices.

Caps18 · Feb 11, 2014

Cory said:
Could this be the ultimate no-fuss travel camera?

That is what I am thinking.

Then again, I will probably still choose the 5Dm2 and it's hassle of carrying the size and weight over this camera.

Now, if I didn't have my 5Dm2, this might be the camera I was looking for.

AcutancePhotography · Feb 11, 2014

While I am sure it is lower on many tog's list, I would be very happy if Sigma came out with an Art version of their 180mm macro. It is already a good lens, but I bet it could be even better.

Rienzphotoz · Feb 11, 2014

yorgasor said:
GMCPhotographics said:

Random Orbits said:

I have the Zeiss 21mm too and I quite like it, especially for astrophotography (not much coma and hard stop at infinity). Now even "modern" Canon lenses exhibit coma like: 24mm 1.4L II 35mm 1.4L 16-35mm f/2.8L

Click to expand...

I guessing that Canon's coma performance will be improved during the next round of release. The 24-70 II is much better coma-wise.

Click to expand...

Is Coma performance particularly important for landscapes? Wide open, how about at f11?

Only for astrophotography. You don't want to stop down to f/11 as your photo will change from a 15-30 second photo at 2.8 to a 4-8 minute photo, and those bugger stars just don't hold still. I just got the Zeiss 21mm last week and took it with me to Moab to break it in. For an astrophotography landscape lens, I must say it is spectacular:

Moonlit Bridge by yorgasor, on Flickr
[/quote]
MAGNIFICENT! ... all you prime lens guys are tempting me into getting these awesome wide angle prime lenses for my Sony a7

hachu21 · Feb 11, 2014

keep calm.... and breath. Final spec says "two control rings". So this one can be used in manual without digging in the menus. and it have a touch screen : the quickest way to choose focus area.

Sella174 · Feb 11, 2014

I already told them (http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=19449.0), but they're ignoring it.

Valvebounce · Feb 11, 2014

Hi Debbie
Sorry I can't help you with hosting, but I would like to say, Flash? Have you any idea how many people you are excluding from using your site? I know you said it is a business hosting service, is it a business site or just better hosting for personal, if business, can you afford to alienate the Ithing users?

Cheers Graham.

Rienzphotoz · Feb 11, 2014

That is some serious bang for the buck, Alan ... Can't believe a $359 camera does such a decent job ... I can only imagine the photos looking even better after post processing them ... thanks for sharing.

Marsu42 · Feb 11, 2014

dickgrafixstop said:
Maybe this time they'll get the lens right - but I'll bet the price will be wrong.

Good iq and good price at least for some time after the lens' release are mutually exclusive - it's a market system after all. If you want a good price you have to look with a product that has some flaws that you can live with but others cannot - like the 6d af system or the 17-40L's (corner) sharpness wide open.

cayenne · Feb 10, 2014

Marsu42 said:
cayenne said:

What are the main models of cameras the devs are focusing on right now?

Click to expand...

Alex (the "main" dev) has a 60d & 5d3, 5d2 is still popular, the Rebels are supported as long as you don't get the newest one because usually not all features are ported. The "maintainted" models as per source tree are (7d/5d3 are alpha):

5D2.212
5D3.113
7D.203
50D.109
60D.111
500D.111
550D.109
600D.102
650D.104
700D.111
1100D.105

Thanks.

I'm still patiently (trying) watching to see when the ML for the 5D3 gets out of alpha....and addresses the non-removable boot flag, or at the very least...the lag time the 5D3 has on boot or waken from sleep.

If that was fixed, I think I'd be loading ML on immediately and playing with RAW video...

I'm DYING to play with that...but I just gotta see the wake problems fixed first. I could live with the perm. boot flag as that my camera is out of warranty.....but I gotta have at least stock waken times.

C

canon1dxman · Feb 10, 2014

I've seen a lot of Canon kit over the last 2 days but not close enough to ID any new stuff.

Viggo · Feb 10, 2014

Albi86 said:
I'm put off by the weight. Not your random walk around or casual throw-in in your bag.

My 200 f2.0 is my favorite walk around, so this will be
a lightweight option. Now I can't wait! ;D

mkabi · Feb 10, 2014

Ricku said:
Pitbullo said:

With the risk of sounding negative... BORING! (Ok, the G1X sounds a bit interesting) ;D ;D

I really really look forward to the day Canon announces their FF mirrorless camera. They have the technology to blow everybody away with their AF technology, which is an area mirrorless lag behind the dslr´s.

Click to expand...

I too would love to see a kickass FF mirrorless camera from Canon. But they won't be blowing anything away with their current sensor tech.

Just look at the A7R from Sony. It trumps everything Canon has in terms of pure IQ.

When the day comes when Canon manages to bring out a brand new sensor (higher resolution, higher DR and no shadow-banding), I doubt they'll put it inside a mirrorless body. At least not until it's been sold in a $7000 1D-body for 2 - 3 years.

Canon is Canon.

Reality is... sony is sony too.
Sony is only just getting into the DSLR market... give them time.
A good example is their high-end TVs that range from $3000 to $5000.
You can get LG and Samsung for a fraction of that price. But then again, they are getting pricey too.

Rienzphotoz · Feb 10, 2014

jrista said:
Rienzphotoz said:

jrista said:

Rienzphotoz said:

jrista said:

Rienzphotoz said:

jrista said:

The really cool thing about viewing Earth from Mars is that Earth is inward of the solar system, rather than outward. It would exhibit phases like Venus does when viewed from Earth, as it orbits around the sun. So you would have New Earth phase, Waxing Earth Crescent, Waxing Earth Half, Waxing Earth Gibbous, Full Earth (largely obscured by the sun, only visible as it enters and leaves this phase, and then only moments after the sun has set on Mars), Waning Earth Gibbous, Waning Earth Half, Waning Earth Crescent.

Even cooler than Venus...with a powerful enough telescope, you could probably see the Moon's phases as well...what a sight that would be: Waxing Earth Crescent with a Waning Moon Half.

Click to expand...

That would be an epic view ... one married guy from Qatar got selected to go on a one way journey to Mars, so maybe he'll get to see "Waning Earth Gibbous, Waning Earth Half, Waning Earth Crescent" etc

Click to expand...

That would be one crazy trip. Maybe someone will bring along a 28" PlaneWave CDK and an ASA DDM160 mount for "Earth Observing".

I don't think it's going to happen, though. The sheer cost of such a trip is so astronomical, not even the world's most popular reality TV show could maintain the funding for it. It would become the single most expensive project the world has ever seen, and I don't think anyone can truly survive on Mars. Not permanently. Honestly, I think when the time comes, if they really do try, it'll end up being a disaster. There are SO many things that could go wrong, not the least of which is food and water supply problems, but also technical issues and personnel issues. Even assuming they try to maintain a supply chain of food and water deliveries, that just means the cost never ends, and they would always need funding.

The key problem with the Mars One mission is the masses of people who would be required to fund it by continually watching the reality show will eventually get bored. Even if the show maintained a core viewership that would never leave, they would never represent the tens of millions of sustained viewers necessary to extract the kind of advertising revenue necessary to sustain the mission.

There is also the inevitable TRUE realization of what these people are signing up for means...a ONE WAY trip to Mars. People think that's amazing right now...but there is no rescue plan, there is no return ship, there is no return period. It is a PERMANENT LIFE CHANGE, on a scale no one on Earth has experienced before. Psychologists can't gauge the effect of that on people, even if they try. That will have to sink in on multiple levels before people finally get it, and when they do, I'd say as much as half the people who sign up for a one way trip to Mars end up snapping once they are stuck there for a LONG year of MASSIVE hardship and the ever-present long-term threat of danger, going ape-S___ crazy, when they realize they are literally marooned on another planet with no hope of return...or at least, no hope unless the Mars One mission ends up building a rescue vessel (which would take years, so all these crazy people just keep on the crazy that whole time...you know what crazy people do to space missions...we've all seen the consequences of THAT via hollywood for enough years).

Mars One...exciting idea...bad idea. Anyway...

Click to expand...

Maybe a bunch of hot nud3 ch!cks, and some "Big Brother" style in-house fights/arguments, drama etc, might keep the reality show going for a few decades ;D ... I wouldn't mind contributing towards the first part ;D ;D

Click to expand...

Yeah...lol...thats where I thought this conversation was going!

I suspect a bunch of hot nude chicks in a big brother style escapade is probably the best way to get everyone killed. At some point your going to get a couple of jersey shore-esque guidos going at it over the chick with big tits, and next thing you know an airlock pops open because the fools are fighting in it....derp, there goes the Mars One mission! Oh, gee, and we got to see a bunch of people bleeding from their eyes while they all died a horrifying death...on live TV...over a pair of tits.... :-\

Click to expand...

Man you are a buzz kill ;D... here I was thinking "happy thoughts" about "hot nud3 ch!cks à la Big Brother style" and you just killed them all in a gory fashion with bleeding eyes and what not ... I propose we all think happy thoughts about those nice ch!cks floating gently in the capsule and the all "airlocks are tightly sealed" ... in addition they all reach safely to Mars and when the ch!cks are getting old, they are safely brought back to earth and replaced with newer hotter ones to live on Mars until they too are replaced and the cycle goes on to keep us all happy ... so whenever we get worked up about DxO discussions, we can go watch them live (or 5 to 15 minutes delayed transmission). So, please, no more killing of the hot ch!cks ... if gore is absolutely necessary for TRPs, (in order to keep Mars mission funding alive and healthy), a few of the dudes can go ;D

Click to expand...

Hey man, you can get all that right here on earth! No need to wait for Mars One! ;D Of course, if everyone on the mars one mission does eventually go bonkers, there is no reason to assume they wont all take their clothes off like normal crazy ppl and have crazy martian orgies while their minds disappear...you never know!

Although we can get "all that right here on earth", there is a problem with that, for old married guys like me ... you see when it's available right here, the wife no like, coz she thinks I might action my thoughts ... but if its in Mars, she'll feel safe that the old man can't go there and that everything is just harmless/wishful happy thoughts ... but she don't know the old man gets quite a bit of pleasure from happy thoughts ;D
But I must confess that I do find your idea of people going bonkers, clothes off, crazy ppl, martian orgy, minds disappear etc very very exciting ;D

;D

Albi86 · Feb 10, 2014

I would be happy to give up 1/3 EV to have a 600mm prime that costs in the same range of the zoom. Or a 550mm f/5.6. There can be variations on the theme. Hell, a razor sharp 500mm f/5.6 would be interesting already.

Thanks to Tamron for proving that it's possible to manufacture such lenses at decent prices. However, for primes I would look in the Sigma direction. Some time ago they stated to be after the big whites. In fact their current 500/4.5 is not a bad lens. Their Sport category looks very barren... I wouldn't be surprised if they started populating it.

The biggest problem are the people. Most users willing to spend such amounts of money would not do so on a 3rd party lens. God, every time a hair is out of place on a Sigma lens, the litany of poor QC starts over and over again.

pedro · Feb 10, 2014

great one! don't show it openly before you got your patent filed...;-)

Posts

Posts

Filter

Forum statistics

Gallery statistics