The samples look pretty good to me. Question is how where they processed. Corner sharpness & price are also unknowns at this point.

http://www.samyang-europe.com/index.php/new-products/102-new-samyang-50-mm-t1-5-as-umc

AcutancePhotography said:

What was your point of focus in the first picture?

Click to expand...

gosh......from memory and subject, it was likely the guy puffing out cigarette smoke.

Tanispyre said:

I do like the Canon 12mm tube, the smaller tubes are useful for shorter focal length lenses, and only Canon makes a 12 mm, for more extension, I see no difference between a good set of Kenko Auto extension tubes, and the Canon ones. The Kenko set also allows more combinations of extension for various magnifications.

Click to expand...

That's not accurate. Kenko also makes a 12mm, and the automatic extension tube set for Canon (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/375102-REG/Kenko_AEXTUBEDGC_Auto_Extension_Tube_Set.html) comes with 12mm, 20mm and 36mm tubes that can be used individually or stacked.

Just bought a set of those and they're quite nice. Perhaps not as beefy as the Canon and don't mount quite as smoothly (but fine), but a good cost savings at $180 for up to 68mm in extension.

Thank you each and all. I called the NJ CPSUSA (couldn't, inexplicably, get through to Irvine) and was very very well-treated by John DiMauro, one of their contacts. I ordered the ring, part # YB2-3754-020, confirmed that this was for Model 2 ZOOM ring, and paid all of $6.15. The real test will be whether my klutzy fingers can get this puppy on. Given my (remote past) extreme difficulty correctly applying condoms, I am worried about this; but the consequences of failure with the lens-collar are less severe, and less expensive.

I can't help with the Tamron as I haven't used it, but the Canon is an amazing lens, certainly one of my favorites, and one of Canon's very best. I regret selling it when I bought the f/2.8 II IS. It's small, sharp as hell with great color and contrast, the IS works great, and it takes the 1.4x extremely well.

infared said:

If someone tells you to use "Lens Tissue"...RUN LIKE HELL!!!! 8)

Click to expand...

Some/many (all?) of these lens tissues seem more like sandpaper on your lens. ;D

Road repair gang at work during the night in east London. 6d / 17-40 combo

The Road Gang Highway, London E1_-36.jpg by petach123 (Peter Tachauer), on Flickr

The Road Gang Highway, London E1_-30.jpg by petach123 (Peter Tachauer), on Flickr

The Road Gang Highway, London E1_-29.jpg by petach123 (Peter Tachauer), on Flickr

The Road Gang Highway, London E1_-27.jpg by petach123 (Peter Tachauer), on Flickr

jocau said:

verysimplejason said:

MLfan3 said:

some 5D guys are extremely insecure and condescending, hating the 6D just like some die hard D8xx fans hate the Sony A7R or D610.
but it all depends on what you shoot or what how much weight you like to carry with you regardless or tiny bit of AF feature set difference between the 2 in question here.
but one thing I am sure about is the 6D's center point AF is quite much better than any AF point of the 61pts of the 5D Af sensor or D810 sensor.
I tried many times in lowlight and nothing with the mirror beat the 6D in the area of lowlight AF.
The GH4 and the A7s are better than the 6D in this specific area, but none of Nikon Canon with mirror beats it.
Oh and also for long exposure thermal noise, the 6D is about 34 percent better than the 5D3 , you can see it in all sensor tests including Roger's.

Click to expand...

Some guys just really don't want to admit 6D's sensor IQ superiority in low-light. Well, if it's AF that's more important to them and what defines "HIGH ISO KING", then so be it. We can't argue on something where our definition differs.

It really hurts when you invested some more $$$ just to find out that it's not superior in everything to something that's significantly cheaper.

Click to expand...

Correct, but the 6D also suffers from that 'disease' as the outer AF points of even the T5i are better than those of the 6D.

Click to expand...

I'm a center-point / MF user so this doesn't bother me. For some, the center point is enough but that's not saying that the outer points doesn't work.

Yet another overheat, causing a plane evacuation.

http://www.gizmodo.in/indiamodo/A-Fuming-iPhone-5-Causes-Evacuation-In-Flight-From-Prague-To-Tel-Aviv/articleshow/40485519.cms

neuroanatomist said:

Don Haines said:

There is a third possibility...

To do 4K right requires 4 times the computing power as 2K video. That makes a lot of heat and drains batteries fast... and there is a real possibility that the problems with dissipating the heat make it impractical in a DSLR body unless you add in heatsinks, and that is a negative to all those using it for stills. Obviously, a 1D-C has the thermal mass, battery capacity, and radiative surface to handle this, but does a smaller body?

Click to expand...

Does the Panasonic GH4 not do 4K right? It certainly doesn't have a large thermal mass or space for big heat sinks inside.

Click to expand...

GH4 has internal 4k although it is 8 bit 4:2:0.

dgatwood said:

I guess my point was that folks who buy the kit lens with a FF DSLR are either upgrading from a crop and replacing all their lenses (in which case they'd probably like something with a focal range that's angle-equivalent to their main crop lens) or they're just starting out. In either case, it's probably their first FF lens (unless they own a long zoom), and for most of them, build quality will be a secondary concern to IQ

Click to expand...

A. When I spend good money on a product, I expect it to have build quality to match. I also wanted something wider than the EF-S 17-85mm that I replaced with the EF 24-105mm. I upgraded from EF-S 10-22mm to EF 17-40mm.

B. People who get to the point of upgrading to FF should be able to read and understand lens reviews, search for photos taken with various lenses, and get a good feeling of what is it they're getting.

[OK, they might be idiots with cash to spare, in which case there's no point in discussing their motivation.]

dgatwood said:

And although most of the pros would lean towards an L lens because of the higher build quality, that doesn't necessarily have much bearing on what the next kit lens should be, because most of them already own lenses, and aren't likely to buy a kit with a lens anyway.

Click to expand...

Exactly - I don't expect pros to upgrade their kit lens, which is what the 24-105mm is.

If a pro wants an EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM with significantly better IQ, he'd probably be willing to split extra cash on something that is too expensive to be kit. It's analogous to the difference between the EF-S 18-200 and the EF 28-300mm L. If you want convenient & cheap, buy crop. If you need convenient & pro, fork a few thousands of dollars on FF body & superzoom, knowing full well you're still making some compromises.

[In other words: the point of kit is cheap, and the reality of cheap is that it sucks, as in not being one of the best L lenses around.]

I only use third party grips, and in poor weather.

The only problem I've had is the paint wearing off on one grip. It made the camera look older/more roughed up than it was.

Canon Rumors said:

<div style="float: right; margin:0 0 76px 0px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/08/smartphone-blunders/">Tweet</a></div>
<p>The previous post about the EOS M3 was not supposed to go live, something went wrong with the WordPress app with my phone. Whenever I receive an email, I automatically make a post and save it. If it’s publishable, I do so. This time, it published and I didn’t want it to.</p>
<p>Sorry about that, the embarrassment is the punishment.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Click to expand...

Fun! What else have you got stories on, legit or otherwise?! Publish them all ;D

Mt Spokane Photography said:

I've turned my quick reply off in the profile settings. ......

Click to expand...

Wow, thanks, that was easy.

Pablo

Suggest by the way you take a look at the films that have shot with Red cameras including films by the biggest DOPs in the industry the images from the Epic (5K) and Dragon (6K) are both right up there such as seen on Prometheus. The Dragon is currently on some pretty big films that will release in 2015 if the big studios thought they represented any kind of risk they certainly would not be using them. Sure the Arri Alexa is the current king of the professional cinematography industry (its 2K) and the two could not be more different.
The Canon C500 or C300 is not the camera of choice for Hollywood most are used for TV with maybe action shots or where the camera is at risk shots being done by Canon C500/C300s and Black Magic cameras. The main reason for this is ergonomics and ease of use the Japanese seems to swamp their cameras with too many switches & knobs when in reality many changes can be performed in post.

mikio said:

5D mark III Central autofocus point performance with Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3

Today I discovered a very strange behavior of autofocus of this lens on 5D mark III.
If you use a single autofocus point it appears that the central point works much worse than others.

The main problem is in refocusing from near objects (~3m) to far away ones (30m).
If only a single center autofocus point is selected for use , the lens is refocusing from near objects to remote very badly. In many cases it gets stuck.

In fact, somehow, I obviously thought that the center point should give the best results. But it turned out that any other point except the central one provides much better refocusing (on 5D mark III). It works a bit slow but OK.

At first, I suspected that maybe it's my camera glitches. So, I put on the Canon EF300 / 4 L IS with 1.4x converter, and of cause the central point here worked exceptionally well with a Canon lens, so that means the camera is OK.
Just don’t understand how it is possible?

P.S.: The lens has actually been updated with the new firmware at a local Tamron service.
The AF menu, "Lens drive when AF impossible" is turned "ON".

Click to expand...

I get odd results with the center point and my 100-400L too, so it's not likely to be 'just' Tamron's fault

finaly this is what i was waiting for to buy their usb lensdock

Allowing 8 large thumbnails seems to have caused a issue with pages loading, the memory setting in the forum software was exceeded. This caused blank pages in parts of the forum. We have plenty of memory, so the tech guy went into the innards and increased allowable memory.

Leson learned - fooling with forum settings can have unexpected results

Very funny.

Mary had a little lamb
Its feet were black as soot
And everywhere that Mary went
His sooty foot he put.

yeah. Agreed. I didn't really get what you were getting at..

How many dyslexics does it take to change a ighltblub?

The Egrets at the back of the site where I work. They won't let me get close so these are shot from about 200 meters away and are heavily cropped.... SIGH! You never have a long enough lens....

The 85L is a wonderful lens and I used it for many events. But I also think it's too heavy for general event use. I just didn't enjoy carrying it!

Nice shot

JPAZ said:

Thanks. I appreciate that is really useful information. So you'd think the 5d3 (with a wrist strap and plate - not an L just a bottom plate) and the 70-200 should fit? Do you carry the 70-300 upright or on it's side? The 70-200 is just a bit longer. Do you think there'd be room for the 17-40 besides?

Click to expand...

I carry the 70-300 complete with collar/plate vertically, but I think the 70-200 might be too long to do that. I don't have a 70-200 to try it out for you, but if it fits vertically it will be extremely tight. The 70-300 fits like a glove with one velcro-stabilized divider between it and my 5D3+24-105 placed on its side with the LCD facing the velcro divider (that puts the 24-105 towards the skinnier side of the fanny pack).

There definitely is not room for a 17-40 to boot, but you could put that lens in an accessory pouch that clips onto the fanny pack if that lens needs to have super-quick access. Otherwise, the cleaner option is to put whichever additional lens is used least (70-200 or 17-40) in the upper compartment of the backpack--a place still fully accessible while wearing the pack by simply sliding it around in front of you and accessing that compartment through the back zipper.

To be clear: the 5D3 + 24-105 and 70-300L snugly fills the fanny pack, but their irregular shapes allow me to also fit the other items I mentioned in my previous post.

I use 30 fps (29.97), 1/60 sec shutter speed. It is smoother than 24p