Canon st-e3 / sekonic L-758dr triggering for testflash
Does anyone have an idea if it's possible to radio trigger the st-e3 transmitter for a test-flash via an pw tt1 with the seconic l-758dr?
/henrik
/henrik
nightbreath said:aznable said:taken with a sigma lens for sure...backfocused a lot![]()
Nope, it's Canon ;D I've focused on the eyelash and the focus is on the right place.
RLPhoto said:I think canon since the 50D has become overly influenced by accountants than photographers.
Does anyone actually think it was the 'photographers' idea to merge the 1D & 1Ds line. Of course not, it was a business decision to take two lines into one. Although 1 series cameras are the flagship and what people read about in magazines, and good for marketing, they are not the money maker to canon. Why tool two assembly lines when you can tool one, and charge more to help with the R&D costs. Hence "we merged the camera lines to one super duper camera!" Ta-Da!!!!
At the end of the day canon sells Rebels through to 5D's to make money and 1 series probably cover costs because of lower production runs and make for good advertising. Average consumers ogle 14 fps, they don't read that the it is achieved with mirror lock. Rebel owners don't ogle over f8 focusing etc.
But at the end of the day we need consumers to buy lots of consumer grade cameras so the R&D can continue to build 1 series cameras for the pros and serious camera enthusiasts. In the meantime we take a hit during economic deprived times where companies are most interested in staying afloat, which doesn't put them in a spot to cater to specified groups that don't have the camera sales to justify another line.
At the end of the day make as many product lines that are financially feasible and target the biggest markets. They are corporate company and have to focus on the bottom line.
Sucks at times but that is business.
robin said:I was told a week ago that they had 740 on backorder! so, when they have 680 now they received 70 to ship. So it can take a long time till they get all for backorder in (in my math it is almost 10 weeks at least till this is filled- AND i am pretty sure that some preorders have been canceled - so it is more likely they only received 50)..... :'(
I understand about your budget but spending half of the 24 f/1.4L II's cost to get one of the new 24mm IS or 28mm IS is anyway a waste of money. They cost double or even triple their real value. The 35mm f/1.4L could be a decent choice (and cheaper than the 24 1.4L II) although not the same mm and maybe still higher than your price limit.DianeK said:archangelrichard said:Lets get honest
Lenses are NOT manufactured to give their best performance wide open -- but stopped down 2 or 3 stops.
That;s just a reality
Further you are looking at a zoom, which is also not designed to give it's est performance at the wwide and long ends but in the middle. These are compromises, lenses of convenience, not sharpness.
So you would do best with a prime that is a couple of f-stops wider than what you need like an F 1.4 or 1.8 shooting at f 2.8 or 3.5 - 4.0
There's no cheating physics
and "micro adjustments" don't exist on the 60D, neither will they necessarily help
Actually I wasn't talking about finding a zoom but a prime and was expressing my frustration with the new pancake and the new 24mm IS and 28mm IS being so soft at f/2.8 versus f/4. Unfortunately the 24mmL is out of my price range and a 50mm is too tight on a crop camera for my needs. The only mention I made of a zoom was stating my EFS 15-85 was sharper at f/4 than any of those 3 lenses I tried.
Thanks for your input. I am coming to the conclusion that I will need to consider a lens faster than f/2.8 so that I can shoot it stopped down.
Diane