Threads

Canon Rumors · Oct 11, 2017

HTML:

Little bits of information are coming about Canon’s next EOS 5DS camera body are coming out. The EOS 5DS or EOS 5DS R Mark II is expected to come some time in 2018.</p>
<p>We’re told the new EOS 5DS body will not see a big bump in resolution, while the number isn’t know for sure, we’re told to not expect more than a 20% <del>10%</del> increase. Hopefully image quality is the name of the game from the new high resolution DSLR body from Canon.</p>

<p><strong>*UPDATE*</strong> <em>We had a typo in our original post, it should have read 20% and not 10%. I apologize for the mistake.</em></p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Mikehit · Oct 11, 2017

I am going to New Zealand for 3 weeks in March next year and looking at what lenses to take for landscape.

I am not an avid landscape photographer but from when I was there 20 years ago I want to make the most of it and get the best possible images. I last went there as part of a 2-year backpacking excursion and in that time went from Himalayas to Australia/NZ with my widest lens being 28mm and not once have I looked at my photos and wished I had used something wider (in my limited experience wider images need careful composition to avoid mediocre results). But I have recently been thinking I really ought to expand my subject matter so landscape is on the agenda anyway.

That's the background.
My current bodies are 6D and 7Dii and I will be taking the 24-105 LIS, 70-200f4LIS, 100-400 MkII. I also have the 17-55 EF-S but knowing the NZ weather would prefer to have the option of FF for landscapes.

I am starting to really put the 24-105 through its paces for landscapes but at the moment am thinking about a more dedicated landscape lens. I am not bothered about f2.8 (I am not a shallow-DOF fiend and this will be primarily a landscape lens) so I was wondering people's comments on the lenses available:
17-40 f4L -

a great stalwart of a lens but for me its downside is lack of IS. I will be travelling with my wife and I want the option of not having to set up a tripod
16-35 f4 LIS - this seems to be the benchmark and covers the 24/28mm range I am already used to but gives the option of wider if I want
24-70 f4LIS - Keeps the 24/28 minimum that I need and seems to be superior to the 24-105 at 24mm (quality dips in the middle of the range by the reviews I have read). Being a 'standard walkabout' range it may well replace the 24-105 if I get it. I guess if I want wider I can always stitch a panorama.
Third party zooms - cheaper than Canon but seem to be heavier, not quite matching Canon quality, or quality is variable. I cannot be bothered with testing/swapping for a good copy. Maybe I am being unnecessarily pessimistic.
Keep the 24-105 and get a prime in the 16-20mm regi

on

I know a lot of this comes down to personal preferences but any thoughts on why you made the choice you did will be gratefully listened to.

kirispupis · Oct 11, 2017

We'll be traveling to Namibia in July of next year, and I'm already planning which lenses to take. I have the wide angle lenses pretty much taken care of, but I'm still wondering which telephoto.

This year we travelled to South Africa and Botswana. The safari part was all private safaris and a 200-400/1.4x on a 1Dx2 worked great. However, I'm wondering for Namibia whether a 600/4 is a better choice because we probably won't be able to off road to get close to the subjects.

We'll be traveling to the following camps (in addition to Quiver trees, Swakopmund, Luderitz, etc)
Mowani Mountain Camp
Ongava Lodge
Mushara Bush Camp
Cheetah View Lodge

Those who have photographed here, do you recommend a 600 (with probably a 70-200 on a crop body) or should I take the 200-400/1.4x again?

Mantadude · Oct 10, 2017

Hello,

Can a lens be damaged when you switch the lens to autofocus on the lens itself, but then manually focus it?

I am specifically looking at the Canon 100mm F2.8L Macro lens. I like to have it on auto focus as I can use the AF-ON button to get the focus close, and then manual to get it just right. I am also using this in a video setting.

Curious if I have been damaging my lens for the last 5 years.

-Dustin

mukul · Oct 10, 2017

Price of NEW EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pancake and USED EF 24mm f/2.8 EF Lens are very similar
Which one to choose?

I have 600D (+18-135 mk1) and no plan to change it or go to FF

I have a 50mm1.8 mk2 that is not working any more

I am looking for
a> low light lens than 18-135
b> indoor usability (50mm is tight for indoors, that is why not looking for 40mm pancake)
c> faster focusing than 50mm1.8
d> macro ability on extension tube (I think pancake 40 will do better)

So forum members, can you please suggest which one I should choose

makismika · Oct 10, 2017

I decided to make new hood for my vintage 300/2,8L from 1988. Original hood was damaged and was not round anymore.

Canon Rumors · Oct 9, 2017

HTML:

The-Digital-Picture has completed their extensive review of the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS Art series lens.</p>
<p><strong>From TDP:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>The promise of Sigma Art lens quality coming to the 24-70mm focal length range along with an f/2.8 max aperture and optical stabilization had a large number of photographers signing up to add this lens to their kits immediately on announcement day. Does the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 OS Art Lens fulfill Sigma’s “It’s Here to Steal the Spotlight” promise? From the perspectives of many, it was hoped that this lens would get that spotlight for its exceedingly sharp image quality performance and from that perspective, I’m sure that there is some let-down among the hopeful. However, this lens is optically competitive and it performs quite well for the price. <a href="https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-24-70mm-f-2.8-DG-OS-HSM-Art-Lens.aspx">Read the full review</a></p>

</blockquote>
<p>This is definitely a lens that should be on your shortlist if you’re looking for an affordable 24-70mm f/2.8 stabilized lens.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

snoke · Oct 9, 2017

Recent review talk about it ISO problem for 6D Mark II.

Images from DxO show it. Not PRNG scores. Measurement.

What this mean?

If math say shot need 1/100, ISO 100, f/5.6, 6D Mark II need 1/60 exposure correct. Only long time camera series not issue is 7D.

If someone have 6D and 6D Mark II, same settings (use manual - ignore EV meter!) darker on 6D Mark II. Anyone? Experiment?

dolina · Oct 9, 2017

I hope Leica Nikon, Pentax and Sony continue to create better products than Canon.

I say this in the hopes that it forces Canon to create better products in the future.

Features I would like to be present on any EOS body released between now and before 2020.

* CFast or SDXC UHS-II card slots with read/writes better than 167MB/s

* Use a Snapdragon 835 or better SoC because DIGIC appears to be worse in terms of performance per watt

* USB Type-C port with USB Power Delivery or Quick Charge 4.0 for charging and Thunderbolt 3 video output and data transfers

* 3.7-inch Multi-touch IPS Wide color (P3) display but never AMOLED due to burn in

* IP67 Splash, Water, and Dust Resistant

* Larger mAh battery in the same form factor.

* No AA filters

* Video bit rate @ more than 167MB/s

* 4K @ 60fps or better

* 1080p @ 120fps or better

* Lighter weight

* Cheaper prices through consolidating to fewer SKUs and increased units produced.

Ozarker · Oct 7, 2017

Wondering whether or not the lack of BR in the new lenses can give a clue concerning lens development. As far as I can tell, the Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II USM is the only Canon lens with the BR coating/element. Several lenses have been released since the release of that lens. None of them have BR. Why?

Could it be:

1. Those lenses released later than the 35mm were developed before BR became a factor in design. Canon simply released the more newly designed 35mm before the earlier designed lenses.

2. Manufacturing costs with BR are too expensive?

3. Canon found that BR just doesn't affect CA as much as thought?

Those are my guesses as to why. Number 1 is my best guess.

ahsanford · Oct 6, 2017

I'll just put this here and see what happens:

https://petapixel.com/2017/10/06/nikon-d850-best-dslr-ever-gets-first-full-100-score-dxomark/

- A

Canon Rumors · Oct 6, 2017

HTML:

Keith over at <a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-camera-rumours-and-info/">Northlight Images has uncovered a large number of sensor patents</a> from Canon. When you put all of these together, you get some interesting full frame sensors that will work with lenses that are quite close.</p>
<p>If you’re bored and love reading patents, take a peak at the list below. (Summarized by Keith)</p>

<ul>
<li>Canon patent info looking at asymmetric micro lenses for sensors [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=09768217">USPTO</a>]</li>
<li>Canon have a slew of US patents dealing with aspects of DPAF, such as one looking at how you deal with the split in well capacity [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=09781328">USPTO</a>]</li>
<li>Another looks at making use of contrast to improve the efficiency of phase AF [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=09781329">USPTO</a>]</li>
<li>If you put lots of smaller BSI pixels under each micro lens you can improve sensitivity and DR [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=09773827">USPTO</a>]</li>
<li>Automating focus micro adjustment is covered [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=09781330">USPTO</a>]</li>
<li>Ever wondered what your camera is up to between shutter press and shutter release, when you are in AF/AE mode [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=09781331">USPTO</a>]</li>
<li>Oh, and one more for those keeping up with curved sensor development [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=09781367">USPTO</a>] – equalizing the influence of bending on dark current</li>
</ul>
<p>This all feels related to Canon’s upcoming full frame mirrorless camera(s).</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon Rumors · Oct 5, 2017

HTML:

We received some interesting information about Canon’s full frame mirrorless project, or should we say projects?</p>
<p>We’re told that there are three active full frame mirrorless cameras currently in different stages of development and that we should be seeing at least one come to fruition before the end of 2018. Photokina in September of 2018 would make the most sense for at least one of the following cameras.</p>
<p>The first project is a full frame mirrorless camera with a native EF mount. This is something we have said has to happen for Canon to enter the world of full frame mirrorless cameras. They cannot abandon the hundred million+ EF lenses out there.</p>

<p>The second project, and this is the first we’ve heard of it, is a smaller full frame mirrorless camera with a new mount. We weren’t told if it’s a modified EF-M mount or something else. I don’t think this is too far fetched, as Canon hasn’t seemed all that interested in developing a wide range of EF-M lenses for APS-C mirrorless cameras.</p>
<p>The third project is a fixed lens full frame camera that is in very early stages of development and won’t be coming in 2018, if at all.</p>
<p>All of this is believable and that’s why we’re posting it. For the moment, please remember this is a [CR1] post and to treat it accordingly.</p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

TWI by Dustin Abbott · Oct 5, 2017

Hello, everyone. I released my final video review of the Rebel SL2 today (I don't know if it is worth investing the time to do a full text review). I try to detail what's good about the camera, but keep coming back to the fact that other than being slightly smaller than the t7i/800D it really doesn't have anything else unique going for it.

Video Review: http://bit.ly/SL200D
Build and Design Video: http://bit.ly/200DFL
Image Quality: http://bit.ly/SL2Images

It's a competent little camera, though the 9 AF point system is pretty much unacceptable. I would personally choose a M5 over this every day of the week.

ahsanford · Oct 4, 2017

https://light.co/camera

Has anyone seen any head to head reviews to see how this computational / 'lens storm' approach stacks up to larger single sensored conventional cameras?

Does anyone own one that minds sharing their experience so far?

- A

drmikeinpdx · Oct 4, 2017

I like to use Rebel-class bodies as travel cameras. When I upgraded to the 77D I thought the extra resolution warranted some testing to determine the best lens to keep on the 77D most of the time. I like the term "walk around lens."

First I got out my ancient 18-55 kit lens and took some test shots of a resolution target. It lack of sharpness was shocking and the contrast was crappy.

Then I tried my EF-S 18-135 which was my main lens used on my T5i. It was better, but still a large step down in image quality from the L lenses I use for serious work. I didn't feel it was worthy of the new sensor.

Next I mounted up the 17-40 F/4 L. The optical quality was good, but the zoom range is pretty short for the size of the lens. Not really worth carrying around.

I tried my 24-105 F/4 L IS and it worked pretty well, but it's awfully large on the little 77D Rebel body. Not a fun walking around lens.

I've had the EF-S 17-50 F/2.8 in the past. After I got the loose zoom assembly fixed, it was quite sharp, but still big and heavy for this role. I also had the Sigma equivalent but wasn't impressed enough to keep it at the time. They were both pretty well suited to the 7D, but too big for the 77D.

So who has discovered the perfect walking around lens for the latest Rebel class bodies? They have tons of resolution, but that's only useful if you have a sharp lens.

So far, my favorite is the 24mm F/2.8 pancake lens. That's a sharp little bugger, even if it isn't stabilized.

I'm wondering if it's worth trying out the EF-S 15-85 or the EF-S 17-85. I believe I had the latter several years ago and sold it due to poor sharpness.

Am I missing any other options for a really good Rebel walk around lens? Tamron? Sigma?

photoenix · Oct 4, 2017

Let me start by saying I really like the design of the website, but it is just way to bright for me, especially at night. That's why I created a dark skin for canonrumors.

All you need, is to install the browser extension Stylish.
Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/stylish-custom-themes-for/fjnbnpbmkenffdnngjfgmeleoegfcffe?hl=en
Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/stylish/

You can find my dark skin here: https://userstyles.org/styles/149152/canonrumors-dark

It took me some time but I think I adapted it to work with most pages.

Hope you like it

Canon Rumors · Oct 4, 2017

HTML:

DXOMark has published their review of the Google Pixel 2 camera and it has been awarded the highest score for a smartphone ever. The first Pixel had a score of 89, the new Pixel camera has received a score of 98.</p>
<p><strong>Fron DXOMark:</strong></p>

<blockquote><p>We’re in danger of running out of superlatives when describing the major image quality attributes of the Google Pixel 2. That makes sense for a device that tops our scoring charts —up from the 94 of the Apple iPhone 8 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Note 8 to a record-setting 98. So for just about any Photo or Video <a class="glossaryLink " style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: #ffffff; touch-action: manipulation; color: #334862; text-decoration: none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted; font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: justify; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" href="https://www.dxomark.com/glossary/use-case/" data-cmtooltip="A use case is a real photographic scenario containing the characteristics required for measuring camera sensor performance under a set of defined conditions. DxOMark defines three use cases for sensors: Portrait, Landscape, and Sports, and a(...) <strong></strong>">use case</a>, it recommends itself as the phone camera with the best image quality. A notable exception to that assessment centers around the added performance in Zoom and Bokeh (including Depth and Portrait) that dual-camera smartphones such as the Apple iPhone 8 Plus and Galaxy Note 8 can provide. This said, the Pixel 2 is especially well-suited to videographers, as it achieves the highest Video score for any device we’ve tested — a 96. <a href="https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-2-reviewed-sets-new-record-smartphone-camera-quality/">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The Google Pixel 2 and Google Pixel 2 XL preorders will go live today in select countries.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Kit Lens Jockey · Oct 4, 2017

I'm sure this has been discussed, but searching for "backup" shows a lot of threads talking about backup camera bodies...

What methods does everyone use to back up their photo collections, and how confident do you feel in your method?

When I first started seriously taking photos, I bought a pair of identical external hard drives and kept identical copies of my photos on each one... Logical enough, if one HDD fails, I'd have another copy of all of my photos, go buy another HDD, and copy the photos back onto that one.

That seemed pretty safe to me, but then I got a cloud service and began keeping a copy of all my photos on that. Since all my photos were now on the cloud, I decided that I didn't need to keep two identical HDD copies in my possession, and I had just about filled up one external HDD at that point, so I started using the other HDD as storage for new photos, instead of keeping it as an identical backup of the first HDD.

I also figured that keeping one copy of my photos on the cloud and one copy physically with me would protect me in case of a catastrophic event like my house burning down, which probably would have caused me to lose my photos when I was just keeping two copies on two HDDs stored in the same location.

But now, with the sheer number of photos, the amount I've spent on equipment and traveling to take all of them, and no plans to stop, I'm wondering if I'm doing enough to keep the backups safe.

I mean, I think I am... If my HDD fails or my house burns down, I get a new HDD, and download them all from the cloud to make myself a new local backup. (However, now that I'm pushing 2TB of photos, it would take a long time to download them all. I worry something could go wrong with that.)

If the cloud service somehow fails, gets hacked, etc, then I still have my own local copy on the HDD to fall back on. Pretty unlikely for both things to happen at once, but now I'm contemplating buying another HDD just to have another redundant copy of them on that HDD, maybe store it some place other than the original HDD copy. Maybe it's overkill, but HDD storage is so cheap nowadays, barely any more than a nice CF card. Seems like it might be worth it.

How does everyone else back up their photos?

Canon Rumors · Oct 4, 2017

HTML:

<em>The breakthrough year for Sigma Global Vision Art, Contemporary and Sport lenses on display; brand new lens addition to be unveiled; Sigma Pros light up stage with new presentations </em></p>
<p><strong>Ronkonkoma, NY – October 4, 2017 </strong>– Sigma Corporation of America, a leading still photo and cinema lens, camera, flash and accessory manufacturer, will showcase its full line up of Sigma Global Vision lenses, including a brand-new addition to the line, at the upcoming PDN PhotoPlus Expo 2017 Expo held at the Jacob Javits Convention Center in New York City from October 26-28, 2017 (booth 837). The company will also have on hand its breakthrough optics for the cinema market – the Sigma Cine high-speed Primes and Zooms – as well as the Foveon sensor-based sd Quattro and Quattro H cameras. “Sigma has had a landmark year with the introduction of seven new lenses across our Global Vision and Cine product lines,” states Mark Amir-Hamzeh, president of Sigma Corporation of America. “Our research and development team is dedicated to creating superior optics that meet the ever-growing requirements of today’s high resolution cameras, taking advantage of every possible design and element to capture the greatest picture detail for both still and moving images. We look forward to showcasing the culmination of what has been a remarkable year in optical advancements for Sigma at this year’s PPE event.” Sigma 2017 introductions include the award-winning 14mm F1.4 DG HSM Art, 24-70mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Art, 135mm F1.8 DG HSM Art, 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary Sigma Global Vision lenses and the new Sigma Cine FF High Speed 14mm T2 and 135mm T2 prime lenses.</p>

<p><!--more--> <strong>Sigma Special PPE Presentation – Sigma Pro Phenom Jen Rozenbaum</strong>

Sigma Pro Jen Rozenbaum will take the PPE stage on Wednesday, October 25, 11:00 AM – 12:30 PM to deliver a PPE Master Class on “How to make every woman look amazing.” Jen will share with attendees her vast experience in boudoir photography, providing top tips and secret tricks – from wardrobe to posing – that flatter all women. Jen’s presentation will help attendees understand how to best dress and pose any woman of any size and shape as well as gain confidence behind the camera whether they are shooting boudoir, wedding or seniors!</p>
<p><strong>Master Photographers Take the Sigma Stage</strong>

Showcasing the very best in photography craft, the expanded Sigma Pro family will headline the Sigma stage and offer attendees a behind the lens look at the techniques and technology that captured some of the year’s most outstanding photographs in the areas of aviation, editorial, glamour, landscapes, travel and weddings.</p>
<p>This year’s prestigious Sigma Pro PPE stage line-up includes outdoor sports and adventure travel photographer Liam Doran, aviation photo expert Jim Koepnick, renowned bird and travel photographer Roman Kurywczak, fearless woman photographer Jen Rozenbaum, and glamour and wedding photographer Jim Schmelzer.</p>
<p>For the Sigma Pro presentation schedule days and times, please visit: <a href="https://blog.sigmaphoto.com/event/photoplus-2017/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://blog.sigmaphoto.com/event/photoplus-2017/</a> ?</p>
<p><strong>Sigma Super Giveaways at PPE 2017</strong>

PPE 2017 attendees who visit Sigma at booth 837 will have a chance to enter and win a Sigma grand giveaway – a 24-70mm F2.8 Art – an MSRP value of $1299.00 USD!</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

unfocused · Oct 3, 2017

Reading this thread: http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=33568.0 and seriously questioning the premise that there would be high demand for such a product, it seems like the best way to test the theory is to survey Canon Rumors Forum Participants. While forum readers are not your typical consumers, one can reasonably assume that if there is little to no interest among forum readers, the interest among the general public would be even smaller.

Canon Rumors · Oct 3, 2017

HTML:

We’re told that Canon’s first foray into a full frame mirrorless camera will use a dedicated CMOS sensor and won’t be using either the EOS 6D Mark II or EOS 5D Mark IV image sensors. The claim again comes from an internal presentation of Canon’s 2018 roadmap. We’re still being told not to expect an announcement until at least August of 2018 ahead of Photokina in Cologne, Germany.</p>


<p>We’re also told that a higher end APS-C based mirrorless camera above the EOS M5 is not in the cards.</p>
<p>Nikon is expected to announce their first full frame mirrorless camera before Canon in the first half of 2018.</p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

IsaacImage · Oct 3, 2017

Hello dear friends
Please enjoy my new blog.
Wedding of Gina and James in Toronto Canada at Airship 37 Event Venue.

The full story on the blog
http://www.isaacimage.com/toronto-airship37-wedding-gina-and-james/

1.

2.
Must have shote for me

once I see the piano

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

AbsN · Oct 3, 2017

Hi

I was looking to replace my Canon 35mm f/2 IS with the Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art (mostly for better bokeh) after buying and being wowed by my new 20mm 1.4 Art which is amazing. I've picked up a used copy of the 35 Art which is in pretty much mint condition. However when testing it against the Canon 35 IS I'm finding it's just not as sharp. The Sigma doesn't seem sharp until f/8 in the mid-frame and the Canon beats it at every aperture. It will be going back for a refund but I'm wondering if this is just a bad copy and I should trying again with a new copy or just stick with the Canon? I'm after it for the rendering of the image for portraits but I also want sharpness for landscapes.

Thanks for any thoughts.

Canon Rumors · Oct 3, 2017

HTML:

<p>B&H Photo has the ikan MS-PRO Beholder 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilizer in the DealZone for $359 (Reg $599) today only.</p>
<p class="fs16 OpenSans-600-normal upper product-highlights-header">PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS</p>

<ul class="top-section-list" data-selenium="highlightList">
<li class="top-section-list-item">3-Axis Motorized Gimbal Stabilizer</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">Supports Loads up to 1.9 Pounds</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">QR Camera Plate</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">12-Bit Encoder, 32-Bit Controller</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">3 x Follow Modes</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">Joystick for Pan and Tilt Adjustment</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">Manual Framing Function</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">Inverted Mode for Low-Angle Shooting</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">3/8″-16 Threaded Mounting Hole</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">Powered by Three 18650 Batteries</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://bhpho.to/2xdDPQA"><strong>ikan MS-PRO Beholder 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilizer $359</strong></a> (Reg $599)</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Threads

Threads

Attachments

Attachments

Poll Poll High Megapixel 1D body

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000 or more

I have no interest in such a body

Filter

Forum statistics

Gallery statistics

Poll

High Megapixel 1D body