ef 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II: Vibration

I traded in my ef 400mm f/5.6L to finance an upgrade to the 100-400mm, a very good decision. I love the range and especially the MFD and IS.

My biggest challenge seemed to be on a tripod--when I almost always turn off IS.

I've had it roughly a year, but I'm just now learning how much attention I need to pay to vibration when the zoom tube is extended. I thought I was using pretty good technique, but I kept having blur even at shutter speeds a bit over 1/500th.

When AFMA'ing the lens on a new body last week, I saw I had been drastically underestimating the amount of time the zoom barrel takes to settle down after any movement whatsoever, including depressing the shutter button.

I'm hoping for advice. Do some photographers keep IS on when shooting at 400mm on a tripod? Do you use your hand or something else to dampen vibration while shooting on a tripod? Obviously, with wildlife, we can't wait for the vibration to stop completely, though I've seen some suggestions online about using a remote and live view. Pretty hard in bright light!

And, for discussion, is the design and construction inherently more prone to vibration because of the way the zoom barrel extends so far out beyond the main portion of the lens body? I don't remember encountering this issue to such an extent on the 400mm f/5.6L prime.

Thanks!

Which standard zoom lens for me??

I had the 24-70 2.8 II. I sold my gear earlier this year. I have recently bought into the Canon 5d4 and just received the 24-105L II. I was waiting since it finally brought things that made it worthwhile. I like the dp 4k video and wanted and updated 24-105 II with hopes of it being better than the 24-70 F4 while giving me the much desired 35mm of extra reach. Often it felt like I shot at 70mm only to crop in. After all the initial reviews it makes me start to regret this decision. It appears it is only slightly better than the v1 and it does not seem better than the cheaper 24-70 version. I would just get the 24-70 2.8 but for me I like the IS in the lens especially for the occasional video. Should I keep it or go to the 24-70 version which is ok... or rebuy the 24-70 2.8 and forgo the IS. I really was hoping it would hit all my tick boxes except if canon produced a 2.8 IS version of course. I shoot family and travel photography but liked the idea of 24-105 covering such a good range. It would be nice to travel with just that lens. Sometimes the 35mm is still not enough. Any suggestions? Has anyone had a positive experience?

TS-E lineup: What upgrades would you like?

I've been thinking about the 45mm TS-E lens and why I won't buy it, but realized there were several TS-E upgrades that in general I would like. Specifically:

i) Sharpness into the corners. The 45mm is a good example of this, can't sharpen across the frame even when stopped down a long way. I know there's field curvature with TS-E designs, but geez! The 24mm TS-E ii performs much better in this regard. IMHO this should be mandatory for landscape and architectural work.

ii) Wider maximum aperture. With the 45-55mm range, I would like an f/2 or f/1.8 if possible. Yeah, that may push the filter size beyond 82mm and therefore out of range of the Cokin P style filter systems which are widely used. Yeah, I could adjust to that (up to a Lee 150 system) and the higher price. One of my uses for TS-E's in landscape is focus slicing across the frame, and shallower depth of field could enhance this.

iii) Put a tripod ring on the darned thing! Sheesh! Users should be shifting the camera relative to the lens anyway for pano stitching and the like. Start making the feet on these rings Arca-Swiss compatible, too, please. [All lens feet for lenses over 2 lbs. should have multiple threaded mount points, too!]

iv) I would still like a longer TS-E with macro or near-macro focus capability (maybe to half life size if 1:1 isn't reasonable). Yeah, I love macro work.

The original TS-E 24mm has been upgraded well even though the mark ii lacks the integrated tripod ring. But both the 45mm and 90mm have been around a long time (though the latter seems reasonably sharp and contrasty in tests and perhaps therefore is less due for an update). The 17mm is more recent than the first TS-Es. Anyone have other thoughts about possible improvements, particularly for different applications like product photography or video which I don't do much of? How about other focal lengths for the set?

DXO Review: Tamron SP 150-600mm F5-6.3 Di VC USD G2

Just posted:

https://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Tamron-SP150-600mm-F5-6.3-Di-VC-USD-G2-Canon-review-Upgrading-a-classic

As with most 4x zooms, looking at an aggregate Sharpness score may drive right past what you care about, so I'd encourage digging into the field maps they post.

But at first glance, the statistical manufacturing process variation / random number generator gods did not bless what I presume is a single copy of the G2 lens that was tested. It looks downright ordinary at 600mm -- worse than the original version.

I don't follow this lens closely, but I would take anything DXO does with lenses with a grain of salt. Awaiting word from other reviewers is highly recommended.

- A

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-12-07 at 10.52.00 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-12-07 at 10.52.00 AM.png
    62.5 KB · Views: 189

Review: Sigma 12-24mm f/4 DG HSM Art

HTML:
The-Digital-Picture has completed their review of the Sigma 12-24mm f/4L DG HSM Art.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Image Quality</strong></p>
<p>From the always-important image sharpness perspective, this lens is a very good performer with a caveat that I will of course explain. At f/4, this lens is quite sharp in the center of the frame over the full focal length range aside from performance becoming modestly softer from 20mm through 24mm. Stopping down to f/5.6 brings sharp center of the frame results to the entire focal length range……….</p>
<p>……… I mentioned the caveat. What I didn’t notice during this shoot was focus shift. As this lens is stopped down, the plane of sharp focus shifts farther away. Because Canon cameras focus with a wide open aperture, this change is not accounted for during either viewfinder or Live View-based focusing (AF or MF). Stopped down manual focusing in Live View will account for the change, but … this is not how we typically focus. <a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-12-24mm-f-4-DG-HSM-Art-Lens.aspx">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p>It looks like Sigma has another winner on their hands with the 12-24mm f/4 DG HSM Art series lens, especially when you factor in the fact it costs about $1000 less than the Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L.</p>
<p>Sigma 12-24mm f/4 Art $1599: <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1282159-REG/sigma_205955_12_24mm_f_4_dg_hsm.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/2gkZVGC">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/SG1224AEOS.html?KBID=64393">Adorama</a> | <a href="https://mpex.com/sigma-12-24mm-f4-dg-hsm-art-lens-canon.html?acc=3">Midwest Photo</a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Upgrade from 17-40 f4 to 16-35 f4 IS?

I am curious if anyone has replaced their 17-40 f4 with the 16-35 F4 IS lens?

Do you feel it is worth the extra money to upgrade? There is where I am having trouble. Even with current rebates, it is still a fairly expensive lens. I do have a 24 2.8 IS lens and love the IS. I use a tripod frequently but still find the IS very useful at times when I don't want the burden of hiking with a tripod. The 17-40 is good lens, could be sharper, especially at edges and wider apetures but this 16-35 lens is very appealing with its sharpness and IS.

I use a 6D, and a RRS tripod, so I am serious about sharp photos.

Patent: Canon EF 600mm f/4 DO IS

HTML:
A patent for the Canon EF 600mm f/4 DO IS has finally appeared. A <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-ef-600mm-f4-do-br-at-canon-expo/">prototype of this lens was shown in September of 2015</a> at the Canon EXPO. We <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-ef-600mm-f4-do-is-to-arrive-in-late-2017-cr2/">were also told a few months ago</a> that the retail version of this lens could be coming near the end of 2017, though we haven’t received confirmation.</p>
<p>Patent publication number 2016-200685 (Google Translated)</p>
<ul>
<li>Release date 2016.12.1</li>
<li>Application date 2015.4.9</li>
<li>Focal length 585.00</li>
<li>F number 4.12</li>
<li>Half angle of view (degree) 2.12</li>
<li>Image height 21.64</li>
<li>Lens total length 335.32</li>
<li>BF 66.92</li>
</ul>
<p>We hope to hear confirmation of a release date in the coming months. We’d also like to see a price tag, but that’s far less likely this far out from an announcement.</p>
<p><em>image credit // <a href="http://www.popphoto.com/canon-is-working-on-600mm-do-br-telephoto-lens-with-its-latest-optical-tech">popphoto</a></em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Tokina 20mmm f/2 for E mount - new astro champ?

Came across a review for the Tokina 20mm f/2 lens for Sony E-mount.

http://www.stanmoniz.com/home/tokina-firin-20mm-review

Reviewer seems a little too enthusiastic, so maybe take with a grain of salt, but his samples look pretty good, and the coma looks good in the pic he provided. I'd like to see how it compares to the Samyang 14mm 2.4 premium and the Laowa 15mm f/2, once they're all out.

Canon Releases Survey Results Confirming Consumer Perceptions of Better Service than Nikon

HTML:
<strong>MELVILLE, N.Y., December 5, 2016</strong> – Canon U.S.A., a leader in digital imaging solutions, announced today the findings from a nationwide third-party blind survey that compared customer perceptions concerning the speed of service and quality of tech support offered by Canon and Nikon. The survey was conducted among photographers (primarily professional, semi-professional, and advanced amateur) in November 2016 and found that customers perceive Canon’s service times to be faster than Nikon’s and that customer satisfaction with tech support is higher for Canon than it is for Nikon.</p>
<p>“Our customers need service they can count on,” said Yuichi Ishizuka, President and COO, Canon U.S.A., Inc. “We are very proud of our achievements in delivering world-class service and support. By making customer service an integral part of our business model, we are positioned to meet and exceed the changing needs and expectations of our customers.”</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><strong>Key Survey Findings</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Ultra-Fast Service:</strong> 76.9 percent of Canon customers who have had a service experience in the last 18 months indicated that the speed of their service was either ultra-fast or fast compared to 64.7 percent for Nikon.</li>
<li><strong>Support Matters:</strong> 90.4 percent of Canon customers indicated that they were completely satisfied or satisfied with the technical support they received, as compared to 73.7 percent of Nikon’s customers.</li>
</ul>
<p>Canon has made significant investments in service and support programs and operations, starting with the opening of their first call center in Chesapeake, VA in 1995. The Company prides itself on providing 100 percent in-house U.S. technical support. When it comes to call center operations, keeping all tech support calls in-house allows the Company to tightly control the quality and depth of the tech support provided. Canon maintains full control of its customers’ repair transactions, unlike other industry players that may rely on local third-party service providers to augment their service processing. This is a key differentiator for Canon and is one of the factors that allows the brand to control quick turn-around times and quality service.</p>
<p><strong>About the Ultra-Fast Canon Service & Support Team</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Support Across the Country:</strong> Canon’s Service & Support Network spans from the East to the West Coast (reaching as far as Honolulu, HI) with 10 locations totaling more than 300,000 square feet of space devoted to serving customers. Canon has two call center locations – in Virginia and New Mexico – which boast an average wait time of only 78 seconds to talk to a live tech support representative. There are also three locations in key metropolitan areas that specifically cater to professional customers, in addition to four factory service locations that serve all customers. Canon also has a Customer Care Center, which offers a service drop-off point at its corporate headquarters located in Melville, NY. In the spring of 2017, the Canon Hollywood Professional Technology & Support Center will relocate to Burbank, CA. In this new location, Canon service and support will be enhanced even further to assist the growing number of professional filmmakers and broadcast production clients in Southern California.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>It’s More Than Just Support: </strong>The Canon Experience Center located in Costa Mesa, CA, not only offers service, but is also home to Live Learning workshops and seminars that provide opportunities to learn the latest photography, video, and printing techniques. Additionally, both the Costa Mesa and Lyndhurst, NJ, locations house product showrooms where customers can explore the latest Canon products.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>100 Percent U.S.-Based Team: </strong>Canon provides 100 percent U.S.-based tech support that is completely in-house staffed with over 600 “all Canon” employees. Canon’s combined nationwide service and support network is comprised of over 1,100 expert service and support team members who maintain full control of service quality and speed of repair transactions.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition to announcing the results of this survey, Canon has also launched a new digital advertising campaign that highlights the Company’s knowledgeable tech support staff and efficient service times that average 2.82 days (1.59 days for Canon Professional Services (CPS) Platinum members)<sup>1</sup>.</p>
<p><strong>About the Survey</strong></p>
<p>A blind survey was conducted between the dates of November 17-22, 2016, resulting in over 2,300 responses from photographers, primarily professional, semi-professional and advanced amateurs. The methodology and results were validated by a third-party expert, Dr. William Bleuel, Ph.D.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

*UPDATED* Here's an Updated 2017 Canon Roadmap

HTML:
The rumormill has gone quiet for the moment, though we expect it to pick up ahead of CPS next month. Below is what we believe we know is coming in 2017, and we expect there are going to be other products as well.</p>
<p><strong>DSLR</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Canon EOS 77D
<ul>
<li><em>Release Date: Either for CES in January or CP+ in February</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Canon EOS Rebel T7i
<ul>
<li><em>Release Date:Either for CES in January or CP+ in February</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Canon EOS 6D Mark II
<ul>
<li><em>Release Date: Late spring or early summer 2017.</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>PowerShot</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Canon PowerShot SX70 HS
<ul>
<li><em>Release Date: Unknown</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
<ul>
<li><em>Release Date: Ahead of CES in January</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Lenses</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Canon EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM II
<ul>
<li><em>Release Date: Either for CES in January or CP+ in February</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM
<ul>
<li><em>Release Date: Unknown</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>A second lens released alongside the Rebels
<ul>
<li><em>We’re told there may be an “interesting lens” coming around the same time as the Rebels.</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cinema EOS</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Canon Cinema EOS C100 Mark III
<ul>
<li><em>Release Date: Unknown, but NAB would be a logical guess.</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Canon Cinema EOS anamorphic lens
<ul>
<li><em>We think at least one is coming for NAB in April.</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>EOS M</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>EOS M3 replacement
<ul>
<li>Release Date: Likely coming in February ahead of CP+</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>We’ll update the roadmap on a regular basis as we learn more about Canon plans.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

CIPA Camera Sales Data Released, Decline Continues

HTML:
CIPA has released their latest camera sales numbers, and it appears the decline in sales continues. It looks like compact point & shoot cameras continue the biggest decline year over year.</p>
<p>You can see shipment comparisons between 2014, 2015 and 2016 in the images below.</p>

		<style type='text/css'>
			#gallery-1 {
				margin: auto;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-item {
				float: left;
				margin-top: 10px;
				text-align: center;
				width: 33%;
			}
			#gallery-1 img {
				border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-caption {
				margin-left: 0;
			}
			/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
		</style>
		<div id='gallery-1' class='gallery galleryid-27564 gallery-columns-3 gallery-size-thumbnail'><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dw-201610_e3.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dw-201610_e3-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="dw-201610_e3" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dw-201610_e2.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dw-201610_e2-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="dw-201610_e2" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dw-201610_e.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dw-201610_e-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="dw-201610_e" /></a>
			</dt></dl><br style="clear: both" />
		</div>

<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

LensTip Review - 16-35 f/2.8L III

And the last major review of the 16-35 f/2.8L III is now published:
http://www.lenstip.com/index.php?test=obiektywu&test_ob=493

No surprises in the review based on what we've already heard, and we've finally got nicely charted out coma performance:

  • Best in class for resolution. A real step forward over the II version, especially on the edges of full frame.

  • Horrific vignetting @ 16mm f/2.8: "It would be difficult to call this situation other than dramatic. Such high vignetting we haven’t seen so far in our tests. At 16 mm and by f/2.8 in the frame corners disappears 75% of light (−4.07 EV)"

  • It's never good for the astro camp when they open with "As long as you work using an APS-C class detector coma shouldn’t be a problem whatsoever." But coma is actually decent (but not great) @ 16mm f/2.8, but at longer FLs it gets worse. But, for comparison:
    • Canon's best wide + fast + zoom for coma, the 24-70 f/2.8L II, is far better for coma @ 24mm f/2.8 than the 16-35 f/2.8L III is anywhere in the focal length range. And the new 16-35 is not even in the same time zone coma-wise as the 35 f/1.4L II, which is shaping up to be a fairly issue free / no weaknesses / legendary lens (which is why I still contend the astro camp probably wants a 24L III with that same BR gunk in it pronto.)

    • The Tamron 15-30 f/2.8 VC has consistently lower coma than the 16-35 f/2.8L III. At the widest end, it's close but the Tamron appears better.

So: nice job to Canon for improving the resolution, but the 16-35 f/2.8L III is not without its drawbacks. I'm perfectly happy sitting on my 16-35 f/4L IS and skipping this pricey new offering.

- A

Winter

Now that winter approaches in the northern hemisphere, it seems appropriate to start a winter theme. It's 'technically' still autumn but it certainly looks like winter here.

Attachments

  • _MG_8017 copy.jpg
    _MG_8017 copy.jpg
    71.5 KB · Views: 215
  • _MG_8264_DxO copy.jpg
    _MG_8264_DxO copy.jpg
    106.6 KB · Views: 200

  • Poll Poll
What do you shoot with.

What level of gear do you use? Select your highest level

  • P/S camera

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Rebel and XXXD with no L lenses

    Votes: 4 2.2%
  • Rebel and XXXD with some or all L lenses

    Votes: 2 1.1%
  • M series with no L lenses

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • M series with some or all L lenses

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XX series (80D, 70D etc) with no L lenses

    Votes: 5 2.7%
  • XX series (80D, 70D etc) with some or all L lenses

    Votes: 8 4.3%
  • X series (1DX, 5D3, 7D2 etc) with no L lenses

    Votes: 4 2.2%
  • X series (1DX, 5D3, 7D2 etc) with some or all L lenses

    Votes: 160 86.5%

The question has been repeatedly asked as to what the typical CR member shoots with. What is the highest level of gear that you use regularly

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,566
Members
24,804
Latest member
zukibird

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB