• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Ode to Youngnuo

I've enjoyed my Yongnuo RF-603 II flash triggers for a couple years now. I couple them with their Yn560‑iii flashes generally. Started to use them as a camera trigger over the holidays, and they worked great.

The reason I started the thread, though was to praise them for their toughness. I (for the second time) forgot the trigger in a pocket and put it through both the washer and the dryer. Upon removing (quite hot to the touch), I put batteries back in turned it on, and if triggered the camera. Used that same trigger for two more days with no problem at all.

I don't expect much else of my electronic equipment is near as tough.

Is Nikon Finally About to Replace D300s?

HTML:
<a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2015/12/27/still-no-reliable-inforumors-on-a-new-nikon-dx-flagship-dslr-camera-d400d500.aspx/#more-100602" target="_blank">Nikon Rumors</a> via <a href="http://www.naturalart.ca/voice/blog.html" target="_blank">Brad Hill</a> has posted that there are whispers that Nikon is finally readying a flagship DX camera in the form of a D400 (or D500). Nikon Rumors had heard in the past that there could be a “double launch” alongside the Nikon D5, which has <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/more-nikon-d5-specifications/" target="_blank">recently leaked</a> and is expected to be announced in mid January.</p>
<p>From Brad Hill:</p>
<blockquote><p>Anyway…in the last 10 days I’ve received 3 separate and independent communications (via email) telling me that a semi-pro (or even higher) quality DX body from Nikon is going to be announced in January. Two of these three sources have been spot-on in the past.</p>
<p>The interesting thing is that I’m getting scant specs, but those I am getting are consistent from all 3 sources – DX format, 10 fps, a “very good” buffer and selling for around $2300 USD. This consistency could say something about rumour credibility (or it could mean all 3 of my sources got THEIR information from the same source). Note that at least one of the sources derives their income from Nikon.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nikon Rumors themselves have yet to receive anything reliable on the subject, but that could change shortly.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Patent: CN-E 70-200mm T/2.8

HTML:
A patent has been filed for a new cinema lens, a CN-E 70-200mm t/2.8. Any announcement for new Cinema EOS products will likely come in March ahead of the NAB show in Las Vegas in April. We expect Canon to be showing their new 8K replacement for the Cinema EOS C500 along with a few lenses at the show.</p>
<p>Patent Publication No. 2015-230449 (Google Translated)</p>
<ul>
<li>Published 2015.12.21</li>
<li>Filing date 2014.6.6</li>
<li>Zoom ratio 2.86</li>
<li>Focal length 70.00 118.30 200.00</li>
<li>F-number 2.80 2.80 2.80</li>
<li>Half angle (in degrees) 12.52 7.49 4.45</li>
<li>Image height 15.55 15.55 15.55</li>
<li>Overall length of the lens 277.01 277.01 277.01</li>
<li>BF 44.72 44.72 44.72</li>
</ul>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon 300 mm f2.8 L II vs. 400 mm f4 DO II

Dear everyone,

I recently switched to Canon equipment for camera and lens. The majority of my photography is wildlife and nature. I initially purchased the 300 mm f2.8 II lens, but now I am wondering if the 400 mm f4 DO II would be a better substitution for the 300 mm lens. I can still return the 300 mm lens since I am within 30 days of purchase.

Advantages of the 300 mm lens:
1) one stop faster at native focal length that the DO lens (should be faster at acquiring focus in low light)
2) more flexible in that i can convert it to a 420 mm f4 or 600 mm f5.6 lens

Advantages of the 400 mm lens:
1) one pound lighter that the 300mm lens + 1.4x extender
2) shorter in length that 300 mm+1.4x extender

In the past I owned a 300 mm f2.8 lens and the majority of the time a 1.4x converter was on the lens, but there were circumstances (birds in flight in low light) where the 300 mm f2.8 had a distinct advantage.

If anyone can please chime in here it would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

John

Shutter Shock - help me understand it (anyone seen Cliff or his notes?)

*posted this on DPR in the "open talk" forum as well*

I read through the 5DSr review recently and kind of skipped over the shutter shock section but then while perusing another forum, I found that the topic popped up there too, in regards to Nikon gear.

I don't own any of the gear in question but it seems like the common denominators are shutter speeds of 1/80-1/30 and with longer focal lengths. Also, apparently Canon's in-lens IS apparently alleviates some of the issue as well whereas SOME Nikon lenses with VR actually make it worse.

Historically, it's been thought that lower megapixel FF sensors had less, or even nothing, to worry about with regards to this issue (hence I never bothered to learn about it as I use the 20mp Canon 6D) but apparently the Nikon D750 (24 mp) proves otherwise and actually had worse results than the D810.

Before I go any further - does it seem like I have all of the info correct thus far? If so...

That brings me to my question... with a Canon 6D, the lenses I own which have "longer" focal lengths would be the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM, Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM, and Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM.

With the 100L, I will often shoot in the 1/50-1/60 range for portraits, thanks to the IS. Thus far, I haven't noticed any issue with it and that's even with pixel peeping at eyelashes (curiosity got the best of me).

With the 135L, I usually aim for 1/160 or higher unless braced or on a tripod so I can't see it being an issue, for ME, with that lens. But it WOULD be nice to know in case I have an isolated circumstance pop up where I'm actually going to mount it on a tripod and shoot slower shutter speeds.

But the 70-300L is a new lens in my arsenal and this is the one I'm most worried about. I literally picked up this lens less than a week ago so I have basically zero experience here. I can absolutely see me using this lens all the way out to 300mm and in the 1/30-1/80 range. Can anyone offer any insight?

I'm not really going to go looking for a problem, but at the same time, if I can avoid (real, not theorized) issues by avoiding 1/30-1/80, then I definitely will.

Thanks for any insight you folks can offer!

Pentax Updates Teaser for New Full Frame Camera

HTML:
<a href="http://www.pentax.com/en/pentaxff/" target="_blank">Pentax</a> has updated their teaser campaign for their upcoming foray into the full frame DSLR world.</p>
<p>In the new teaser, Pentax lets us know about its crop mode feature:</p>
<p><strong>Crop mode with a choice of three settings

</strong>The new PENTAX 35mm full-frame digital SLR camera features a Crop mode, which allows you to select the image size to be recorded, with a choice of three settings: AUTO, FF and APS-C. The AUTO setting automatically selects the appropriate image size for the lens mounted on the camera. It selects either a 35mm full-frame image size for D FA- and FA-series lenses, or an APS-C image size for DA- and DA L-series lenses. The FF setting captures all images in a 35mm full-frame image size, regardless of the lens mounted on the camera.* The APS-C setting captures all images in an APS-C image size, regardless of the lens**, while displaying a cropping frame in the camera’s viewfinder.</p>
<p><em>* In the FF setting, an image outside the APS-C-format picture frame may not be reproduced in sufficient quality with certain lenses and/or in certain situations.</em>

<em>** When an image is cropped to an APS-C image size, the number of recorded pixels is lower, as the pixels in the cropped areas are eliminated.</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Image Sensor & Lens Patents from Canon

HTML:
<p><a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/">Northlight Images</a> has spotted a couple of interesting image sensor patents from Canon, along with the USPTO patents for various Canon lenses.</p>
<p><strong>Image Sensor Patents</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>On chip A/D conversion [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=09219872&homeurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpatft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO2%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsearch-bool.html%2526r%3D4%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526co1%3DAND%2526d%3DPTXT%2526s1%3Dcanon.AANM.%2526OS%3DAANM%2Fcanon%2526RS%3DAANM%2Fcanon&PageNum=&Rtype=&SectionNum=&idkey=NONE&Input=View+first+page" target="_blank">USPTO</a>]</li>
<li>Improving pixel based AF in bright light [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?docid=09219853&PageNum=1&IDKey=812E78443812&HomeUrl=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2%2526Sect2=HITOFF%2526p=1%2526u=%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsearch-bool.html%2526r=8%2526f=G%2526l=50%2526co1=AND%2526d=PTXT%2526s1=canon.AANM.%2526OS=AANM/canon%2526RS=AANM/canon" target="_blank">USPTO</a>]</li>
</ul>
<p>As we’ve said a lot over the last while, we do expect some big jumps in Canon sensor technology.</p>
<p><strong>Canon Lens Patents</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?docid=09217851&SectionNum=1&IDKey=014B9F8A0796&HomeUrl=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2%2526Sect2=HITOFF%2526p=1%2526u=%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsearch-bool.html%2526r=39%2526f=G%2526l=50%2526co1=AND%2526d=PTXT%2526s1=canon.AANM.%2526OS=AANM/canon%2526RS=AANM/canon" target="_blank">USPTO</a>]</li>
<li>Canon EF-S 15-105 f/2.8-5.6 [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?docid=09217849&SectionNum=1&IDKey=80815EB856F5&HomeUrl=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2%2526Sect2=HITOFF%2526p=1%2526u=%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsearch-bool.html%2526r=40%2526f=G%2526l=50%2526co1=AND%2526d=PTXT%2526s1=canon.AANM.%2526OS=AANM/canon%2526RS=AANM/canon" target="_blank">USPTO</a>]</li>
</ul>
<p>The EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III continues to make an appearance and we were recently told that the new lens is <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-ef-16-35mm-f2-8l-ii-replacement-in-the-wild-cr2/">in the hands of select photographers</a>.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Is this a common problem with the 5D mkIII?

I occasionally get pinkish artifacts on my shots when there is a very bright area next to a darker area. Sometimes it only shows when you magnify the image (as in the Kookaburra photo below - this is cropped from a full frame shot, and then expanded to twice the size to show the problem), but sometimes it is plainly an issue even when not magnified (see the trees photo).

Any hints on what would cause this?

The Kookaburra was taken with an 85mm 1.2L II lens at f 4 and 1/125 sec @ iso 100
The trees were taken with an 85mm 1.2L II lens at f 1.2 and 1/60 sec @ iso 250

Attachments

  • IMG26482_Articfcat_Sample1200_800.jpg
    IMG26482_Articfcat_Sample1200_800.jpg
    420.5 KB · Views: 238
  • IMG27932Kookaburra_Sample_200%.jpg
    IMG27932Kookaburra_Sample_200%.jpg
    223.9 KB · Views: 222

Predictions on What to Expect From Canon in 2016

HTML:
<p>I think we’re all waiting eagerly for 2016, as we expect a lot of new consumer, prosumer and professional products from Canon.</p>
<p>Below is what we expect to see from Canon with some predicted specifications.</p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS-1D X Mark II</strong>

This is a no-brainer and we expect this to be the first big product announcement from Canon in 2016.</p>
<p><strong>Predicted specifications:</strong> 20-24mp, ISO 409,000, 15fps, 4K Video, DIGIC 7, More than 61AF Points, Dual CFast, GPS</p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

</strong>We expect to see a brand new version of Canon’s most popular full frame camera soon after the EOS-1D X Mark II, most likely in early Q2 of 2016. The big question with this camera, will it shoot 4K?</p>
<p><strong>Predicted Specifications: </strong>28-32mp, ISO 409,000, 8fps, DIGIC 7, More than 61 AF Points, CF & SD, GPS, Wifi, NFC</p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 6D Mark II

</strong>Canon’s entry level full frame DSLR is likely to get an update, but we don’t think it’ll come until the end of 2016, perhaps even after Photokina in September. It should be an incremental update to help keep the price down.</p>
<p><strong>Predicted Specifications:</strong> 25mp, 6fps, DIGIC 7, 19 AF Points, SD Card, Wifi, GPS, NFC, Swivel LCD</p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 80D

</strong>Canon will be updating the EOS 70D some time in the first half of 2016 we think and it should be a decent upgrade for the popular APS-C camera. We don’t expect anything revolutionary, as the EOS 7D Mark II isn’t due for an update anytime soon.</p>
<p><strong>Predicted Specifications: </strong>24mp, 6fps, DIGIC 7, 19 AF Points, SD, Wifi, GPS, NFC, Swivel LCD</p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS M4

</strong>We honestly have no idea what Canon may have up their sleeves for the EOS M4. We do expect a departure from the EOS M3 and someone of a “relaunch” of the system in the first half of 2016. We’re not sure if we’re going to see a full frame mirrorless camera any time during the year.</p>
<p><strong>Predicted Specifications:</strong> 24mp, 10fps, DIGIC 7, A Bazillion AF Points, SD, Wifi, GPS, NFC, Swivel LCD</p>
<p><strong>EF & EF-M Lenses

</strong>We expect to see a lot more new lenses added to the Canon lineup, as 2015 was a pretty good year. Below are the lenses we expect to see in order of most likely to least likely. Again, these are just predictions for the moment.</p>
<ul>
<li>Canon EF 16-35 f/2.8L III</li>
<li>Canon EF 200-600 f/4.5-5.6L IS</li>
<li>An ultrawide Non-L EF zoom</li>
<li>Canon EF 50 f/1.4 USM</li>
<li>Canon EF 600mm f/4 DO IS</li>
<li>Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L III</li>
<li>Canon EF 200 f/2L IS II</li>
<li>Canon EF 800 f/5.6L IS II</li>
</ul>
<p>We also expect to see new EF-M and non L zooms during the year. As always, lenses are the hardest part of the Canon lineup to predict and get information on.</p>
<p>Sound off on the forum.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Advice: have 24/1.4L II, get 35/1.4L II or replace with 24-70/2.8L II?

Happy (Canon) holiday season and leave the socks hanging on the fireplace for Santa is rumored to visit in January with new dSLRs. As mentioned in subject I'm totally baffled if it's better to part with my 24/1.4L II prime and get a 24-70/2.8L II or keep it and get a 35/1.4L II.

I'm shooting landscapes and f/1.4 has proven of no real use to me but I need the best 24mm throughout the aperture range. I have now decided to get a slightly wider than 50mm lens for more flexibility and the new 35/1.4L II is a real temptation, then again f/1.4 is not a priority but all other apertures are. 24/1.4+35/1.4 sound like a perfect quality match. On the other hand, if you've tried is the 24-70/2.8L II comparable from f/2.8 and above and up to 50mm or don't I even bother?

Announced: Tokina AT-X SD 14-20mm f/2 PRO IF PRO DX

HTML:
<p>Tokina is set to announce a 14-20mm f/2 PRO lens for APS-C cameras.</p>
<p><strong>Lens Specifications:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Lens design: 13 elements in 11 groups</li>
<li>High-precision, low-dispersion aspherical element</li>
<li>One-touch focus clutch</li>
<li>Filter diameter: 82mm</li>
<li>A minimum focusing distance: 0.28m</li>
<li>Maximum magnification: 1:8.36</li>
<li>Inner focus</li>
<li>Nine aperture blades</li>
<li>Total length: 106.0mm</li>
<li>Maximum diameter: 89mm</li>
<li>Weight: 735 g</li>
<li>Release date for the Nikon version: March 2016</li>
<li>Suggested retail price in Japan: ¥129,600 including tax ($1000USD, but we expect it to be lower)</li>
</ul>
<p>Technical specification after the break.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Technical specifications:</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Focal length</th>
<td>14-20mm</td>
<th>Brightness</th>
<td>F2.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>format</th>
<td>APS-C</td>
<th>Minimum aperture</th>
<td>F22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Lens constitution</th>
<td>11 group 13 sheets</td>
<th>coating</th>
<td>Multilayer coating</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Angle of view</th>
<td>91.68 ° ~ 71.78 °</td>
<th>Filter Size</th>
<td>82mm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Minimum focusing distance</th>
<td>0.28m</td>
<th>Macro maximum magnification</th>
<td>1: 8.36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Focus method</th>
<td>Internal focus</td>
<th>Aperture number of blades</th>
<td>Nine</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Greatest dimension</th>
<td>89.0mm</td>
<th>full length</th>
<td>106.0mm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>weight</th>
<td>735g</td>
<th>Hood (included)</th>
<td>BH-823</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

A New 50mm Lens Mentioned Again [CR2]

HTML:
<p>We’re told that a new 50mm lens will appear in 2016, but we were not told whether it was the EF 50mm f/1.4 or EF 50mm f/1.2L that would be getting the replacement. 2015 saw the release of the EF 50mm f/1.8 STM (<a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/best-worst-releases-from-canon-in-2015/" target="_blank">our favourite Canon product release of the year</a>! Which was a good laugh for some), though most of us were expecting the EF 50mm f/1.4 to get replaced first.</p>
<p>We’re told that an image stabilized 50mm lens is in testing, though no mention of aperture. We’d have a hard time believing Canon would release a stabilized lens faster than f/1.8 for the EF mount, even if it would be unique a product, and probably welcomed by many people. With IS comes added size and added cost, would you be ok with that?</p>
<p>We’d guess the mentioned IS version of a 50mm lens would be for the EF-M mount.</p>
<p>We’d like to see both the f/1.4 and f/1.2L 50mm lenses get a replacement sooner than later. Modern AF and build and perhaps a floating element in the L.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Interview: Sigma CEO Kazuto Yamaki

HTML:
<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_5vUXrWFzCM" width="728" height="409" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>A great interview with Sigma CEO Kazuto Yamaki was been posted by Mobile 01. The interview is in english. I’ve heard he’s a unique person in the world of photography when compared to his peers, and has lofty goals for Sigma and for the industry.</p>

Help please on new lenses

I have a question for anyone who would care to help. I've been thinking about making the switch to FF in the next year and have a question. At what point does one notice the difference between really good zooms and prime lenses? For example, I'd love a 5dsr and would really like a 11-24, 24-70 2.8, and a 70-200 2.8. However, I take a lot of landscape, have no need for quick fps rates, will use a tripod most of the time, and wondered if primes would be seriously that much better. I mean, everywhere I read, the above zooms are stellar, and seem to take a lot of beating. I've even thought of getting a couple of Zeiss otus as I don't mind MF...but...at what point would I really tell the difference? Would I have to produce 2ft. prints to see it, or will there be a marked improvement at A3? Most of my stuff will be at A3 or A2 with the occasional image blown up very large. I used to love shooting with Zeiss in the old days (film) because I could point them straight into the sun and still get flare free stunning images. Any help offered would be greatly appreciated. Thank-you.

Patent: Canon EF 16-40mm f/4

HTML:
<p>A <a href="http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2015-12-23" target="_blank">patent for a 16-40mm f/4</a> has appeared. This could be a sign that the EF 17-40mm f/4L may be on its way out. We have been told that there was a possibility that the EF 16-35 f/2.8L II replacement could be wider, maybe the information was the EF 17-40 f/4L replacement instead.</p>
<p>Patent Publication No. 2015-206976 (Google Translated)</p>
<ul>
<li>Published 2015.11.19</li>
<li>Filing date 2014.4.23</li>
<li>Zoom ratio 2.36</li>
<li>Focal length 16.48 24.40 38.90</li>
<li>F-number 4.12 4.12 4.12</li>
<li>Half angle (in degrees) 52.70 41.56 29.08</li>
<li>Image height 21.64</li>
<li>Overall length of the lens 177.74 162.40 159.73</li>
<li>BF 38.00 45.51 63.40</li>
</ul>
<p>One thing that stick out to us about this patent is the size of the lens and the fact that it’s not an internal zoom design like the current EF 17-40mm f/4L, the ‘new’ lens is also looks to be larger. Canon has increased the size of a lens recently with the EF 35mm f/1.4L II. The original was 3.4″ inches long and the new one comes in at just over 4.1″ (Canon spec), though it <a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-35mm-f-1.4-L-II-USM-Lens.aspx" target="_blank">measures at 4.43″ according to TDP</a>.</p>
<p>There has been a flurry of patent activity on optical formulas lately. We could be in for another good year of new lenses releases.</p>
<p><em>Note: We removed the “L” from our original post, we put it there out of habit. The patent makes no mention of a red ring.</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Sports shooters: It's a tough life!

I bang up and use my 1Dx's pretty consistently. I noticed I had some AF misses which were unusual at a track meet 12/12. So since I'm a Platinum member for CPS I sent them in explaining the problem.

On 1Dx number 1 the following was found: "Your product has been examined and it was found that the part did not operate properly because the mirror did not operate properly. The part was replaced and product functions were confirmed."

On 1Dx number 2: "AF assembly was out of position causing inaccurate auto focus. Electrical adjustments were carried out on the AF assembly. Product functions were confirmed. Adjusted exposure and ffd, basic focus and shutter speed. Updated firmware. Cleaned C-MOS and checked to all factory specs."

Whew!

At long last, DXO aggregates all lens testing together

Weekes after DXO reported the 5DS R lens testing, the lens test results are finally now in 'gen pop' with the rest of their lens testing in their tables and rankings:

http://www.dxomark.com/lenses#hideAdvancedOptions=false&viewMode=list&yDataType=rankDxo

Joyous DXO magic of note:

  • The sharpest 9 lens + body combos in their database are on the 5DS R, yet only 4 of those cracked the DXO top 10 in their absurd lens ranking system.

  • In the following instances of a 'near identical' lens from Zeiss / Sigma being offered on both the EF or Nikon mount, we have the following wonderful findings:

    Zeiss Otus 55mm
    On Nikon (D800E): Sharpness = 33 P-MPix, Overall Score = 50
    On Canon (5DS R): Sharpness = 37 P-MPix, Overall Score = 46

    Zeiss Otus 85mm
    On Nikon (D800E): Sharpness = 35 P-MPix, Overall Score = 49
    On Canon (5DS R): Sharpness = 41 P-MPix, Overall Score = 47

    Sigma 35mm Art
    On Nikon (D800E): Sharpness = 30 P-MPix, Overall Score = 43
    On Canon (5DS R): Sharpness = 34 P-MPix, Overall Score = 41

    So if the lenses are effectively identical, one would look at the sensor/mount as a root cause for a lower score. I'm sure someone more versant with DXO's pentagon-like level of transparency can explain how sensor-stack-y transmission differences might explain that scoring discrepancy. Or it's just DXO being DXO.

    In fairness, there were some less high profile Sigma / Zeiss lenses that the Canon so comprehensively outresolved the Nikon that even DXO had to give Canon a higher score.

- A

Sydney baby!

I will be in Sydney from 25th December to 9th Jan. Lets meet!
I going with 5d3, 35 f2 IS.16-35 f4 IS. 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 f4 IS and 85 1.2. (is 24-70 redundant?)
Wish I had my 1dc but it is rented out. It is possible I might get a 5dsr as a loaner and I would love to test it.
A friend is willing to lend me his D800r with lenses but I am in two minds - What if I actually like Nikon better? [Joking]. And to carry a separate set of batteries, lenses would be a pain. Going with my girlfriend so two cameras are best.

Any photo opportunity tips are so welcome!

Canon U.S.A. Closes Out 2015 With Industry Awards And Recognition

HTML:
<b>MELVILLE, N.Y.</b> — Reflecting on a year of continued product innovation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions, recognizes the many awards from prominent industry organizations and publications it received throughout 2015 – a hallmark year as the company hosted its once-every-five-year Canon EXPO, which can still be <a href="https://expo.usa.canon.com/?page_id=373" target="_blank">explored online until December 31.</a></p>
<p>In addition to its well-known camera, printer and business solutions, Canon Inc. was ranked three in the U.S. in patents received, with 4,055 patents granted in 2014 and 40 out of 100 on Interbrand’s “Best Global Brands” in 2015, demonstrating the Company’s sustained strong global brand performance. Additionally, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency awarded Canon with a SmartWay® Excellence Award for the brand’s service as an industry leader in freight supply chain environmental performance and energy efficiency.</p>
<p>“We are proud of the innovative products we continued to deliver to our loyal customers,” said Kotaro Fukushima, senior director and general manager, Corporate Communications Division, Canon U.S.A., Inc. “We are honored that the industry and media recognized our hard work and dedication to producing quality, best-in-class products and look forward to continuing the momentum in 2016.”</p>
<p><strong>Consumer Recognitions</strong>

Canon earned several distinguished awards for its consumer products in 2015, such as the <strong>Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-1000 </strong>receiving “Printer of the Year” from <em>ImagingResource.com</em>, the <strong>MAXIFY iB4020</strong> and <strong>MAXIFY MB5320</strong>were named “Editor’s Choice” from <em>ComputerShopper.com</em> and <em>DigitalTrends.com</em>, respectively.</p>
<p>Products from the camera and lens portfolio that received two or more industry awards include:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Canon C300 Mark II:</strong> “Best New Camera NAB 2015” – NewsShooter.com; “Award of Excellence” & “Best in Show NAB 2015” – ProductionHUB.com</li>
<li><strong>Canon EOS 5DS R:</strong> “Honoree, Digital Imaging” – CES Innovation Awards; “Editors’ Choice” – DigitalTrends.com; “Hot One Award – Best Full Frame” – <em>Professional Photographer Magazine</em>; “Best Pro Camera”− Resource Magazine; “Cameras of the Year- Best Professional Cameras” – <em>Imaging Resource</em></li>
<li><strong>Canon EOS 5D S:</strong> “Pop Award 2015” ─ Popular Photography; “Best Pro Camera” and “Editors’ Choice” ─ Reviewed.com; “Cameras of the Year- Best Professional Cameras” – <em>Imaging Resource</em></li>
<li><strong>Canon EOS Rebel T6s:</strong> “Editors’ Choice” – <em>DigitalTrends.com</em>; “Silver Award” – DPReview.com; “Camera of Distinction, Intermediate DSLR” and “Dave’s Pick” – <em>ImagingResource.com</em>; “Editors’ Choice” – <em>PC Magazine</em></li>
<li><strong>Canon XC10:</strong> “Post Pick Award – Coolest New Product NAB 2015” – <em>Post Magazine</em>; “Best in Show NAB 2015” – TVTechnology.com; “Honoree – Digital Imaging” – CES Innovation Awards; “Editors Pick” ─ <em>Resource Magazine.</em></li>
<li><strong>Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM:</strong> “Editors’ Choice” – <em>PC Magazine</em>; “Hot One Award – “Hot One Award-Best Telephoto Zoom Lens” – <em>Professional Photographer Magazine</em></li>
<li><strong>Canon EF 11-24mm f4L USM:</strong> “Hot One Award-Best Wide-Angle Lens” – <em>Professional Photographer Magazine</em>; “Best Lens – Full-Frame” – <em>DPReview.com</em>; “Pop Award 2015” – Popular Photography; “Lenses of the Year, Best Zoom Lens” – <em>Imaging Resource</em></li>
<li><strong>Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM:</strong> “Editors’ Choice” – <em>PC Magazine</em>; “Hot One Award-Best Portrait Lens” –<em>Professional Photographer Magazine</em></li>
<li><strong>Canon PowerShot G3 X:</strong> “Editors’ Choice” – <em>DigitalTrends.com</em>; “Editors’ Choice” – Reviewed.com</li>
<li><strong>Canon EOS 7D Mark II: “</strong>Hot one Award- Best APS-C” from <em>Professional Photographer Magazine</em>, “Lucie Technical Award for Best Crop Sensor Camera” <em>The Lucie Awards</em>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Also included in this year’s award line-up was recognition for other products from Canon’s camera and lens portfolio, including: the <strong>Canon EF400mm f/4 DO IS II USM</strong> received the “Hot One Award – Best Action Lens” from <em>Professional Photographer Magazine</em>; the <strong>Canon EOS Rebel T6i </strong>received “Dave’s Pick” from <em>ImagingResource.com</em>; the <strong>Canon PowerShot SX60 HS</strong> received the “Editors’ Choice” from <em>PC Magazine</em> and the<strong> Canon Speedlite 430 EX II</strong> received a “Pop Award 2015” from <em>Popular Photography.</em></p>

Teardown: Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art by LensRentals.com

HTML:
On the heals of the <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/teardown-canon-ef-35mm-f1-4l-ii-by-lensrentals-com/">Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II teardown</a> by LensRentals.com, they now bring us a teardown of its main competitor, the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art.</p>
<p>While the Sigma isn’t as well built as the EF 35mm f/1.4L II, it also costs half as much and by the looks of things, should hold up rather well.</p>
<blockquote><p>Many people are going to compare this lens to the Canon 35mm f/1.4 teardown we did and say that’s why they chose the Canon. That’s legitimate reasoning. The Canon is weather resistant, twice the price, and twice the weight, roughly. If I was going to subject my lens to harsh conditions and use, the Canon looks like the way to go if you can afford it. But if I want to carry several primes in a convenient size and at a convenient expense, the Sigma is a superb choice and I expect it will hold up very well. As always, horses for courses. <a href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2015/12/sigma-35mm-f1-4-dg-hsm-art-lens-teardown" target="_blank">Read the full article…</a></p></blockquote>
<p>One noticeable issue with the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art is there is nowhere to optically adjust the lens, so that may be a reason there can be such a copy performance variation. The Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II has 2 spots, and copy variation is the best of the 35mm options for your DSLR.</p>

Wachabloesung

This December I have time to play with new toys and also some funds to improve my equipment.

Something that I never thought possible happened, TAMRON usually always just the runner up in my choice (with the exemption of cheap Travel ZOOMS) suddenly produces sexy lenses and after testing two Tamron lenses for a week I will put two of my longest companions the 17-35 L and the 24-70 L up for sale and keep the Tammy 15-30 and 24-70 VCD.

Sure there have been almost 3 successors to the 17-35 L and the 24-70 L II outperforms the Tamron counterpart but going now weather sealed from 15 to 70 mm in 2.8 and with the comfort of a modern stabilizer and 5 years warranty is comforting.

I shed a little tear when I gave away my 80-200 L and even more when saying good bye to the 200 2:8 L but somehow loosing the Brick and the Nova Flare does not make me sad.

It's actually funny, I always loved the way the 24-70 L makes use of the sun shade through the counter intuitive way the zoom extends. Now the Tamron 15-30 uses exact this technology in a more subtile way as well.

regards

Attachments

  • IMG_9547.jpg
    IMG_9547.jpg
    2.1 MB · Views: 207

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB