Hooray for refurbed gear from the Canon store

I've heard everyone's glowing take on the quality of refurb'd lenses, but I actually had never snapped one up myself before last week. Just picked up a 35mm f/2 IS USM refurb from the Canon store.

I was hard-pressed to see anything -- scuffing, wear, dust, etc. -- different than a factory new lens (other than the packaging, of course).

It's a sharp piece of kit as well. No AFMA needed on my 5D3, but I recognize that's luck of the draw to some extent. Just took it on a long weekend away and was properly impressed with how it performed.

Hip hip hooray for Canon Store refurbs. I'm pleased as punch with my first. Now if only if I could find refurb'd first party hoods and refurb'd B+W filters... :)

- A

Canon EF 85mm f1.2 vs Zeiss 85mm f1.4 Milvus (having the Sigma 85mm f1.4)

I love 85mm focal length. Having the Sigma 85mm f 1.4 I am not happy with it. Mainly because of autocus Problems.


Therefore I am considering to upgrade. And the 85mm f1.2 has no weather sealing but a Slow but accurate autofocus but the Milvus has weather sealing but no autofocus - but Manuale Works with Zeiss Lenses, too.


Does anyone has experience with both lenses and can give recommandations?

80D Heavy AA filter?

I have been wanting to get a nice Canon APS-C sensor to go with my 100-400mm for Casual Birding. I waited for an improvement in sensor tech, and I think we are there.

There is a lot to like about the 80D. However, for Birding a sharp output is desired. Looking at the footage and comparison of the 80D with other bodies, it seems a bit softer. South of the 5Ds, this is the highest MP sensor that Canon offers , which should be able to provide reach and detail. I am a bit disappointed, it seems they used a heavy handed AA filter on this. Even compared to the 5D3, which already had a heavy AA filter, the 80D seems noticeably softer.

I then proceeded to compare it to the 20mp 70D, and again found it soft. Details are being smudged and might not be able to be recovered via post sharpening.

See the attached comparison to the older 70D (Image resource) on the left, looks quite sharper at base iso compared to the 80D.

Attachments

  • DSC_1633.jpg
    DSC_1633.jpg
    481.1 KB · Views: 471

Why do lenses need a battery in the camera to manually focus?

Just throwing this out as a query to the many sages out there. Why do lenses need a battery in the camera to manually focus?

Found this out when I was playing with a TS-E 24 on my [very new] 7D2, which had it's battery in the charger. I thought there was something wrong with the lens; found out that any of my lenses [whether manual or AF], on either of my Canon bodies would not appear to focus through the viewfinder unless a battery was physically in the camera, even though the camera wasn't turned on.

Not a problem or complaint - just curious as to why this is. ???

1Dx Mk2 vs Nikon D5 First ISO Duel

Dear friends,

This is a link of a French photo site, to get a first taste of an informal side by side comparison between 1Dx Mk2 and Nikon D5 ISO performance, throughout their ISO range. On my 27" calibrated EIZO pro screen it seems that they go hand by hand up to ISO 25600, with Nikon taking the lead by a questionable 1/3 - 1/2 of a stop at ISO 51200 and both looking like total useless crap above that! The only noticeable difference is that, letters look a bit smudgier on 1Dx Mk2 from ISO 6400 upwards, but then again they're jpeg images so i guess it's something to do with the in-camera conversion algorithm or whatever software related.

From a serious amateur photographer and videographer standpoint i think that, once again, Canon is much more honest about their ISO claims and Nikon uses a ridiculous marketing trick of a 3+ million ISO to lure the "mine is much bigger than yours" enthousiast! Also, don't forget the profound downgrade of Nikon D5's low ISO performance i had recently pointed out in another topic i started in "third party manufacturers" section of the forum.

That's my two cents, here is the link, make your own thoughts and comments, don't forget that all RAW files of both cameras are available under the sample ISO pics for downloading, so you can extract your own conclusion.

http://www.focus-numerique.com/test-2918/reflex-canon-1d-mark-ii-bruit-electronique-12.html

Wishing you all the best; health, luck and happiness for you and all those you love and being loved by!

Yiannis
Athens, Greece.

Wedding lens telezoom?

I was considering a new telezoom, I am going to use it outdoors,portraits,weddings etc. I have the 70-200 F4IS which is pretty nice but bites in dim lit wedding receptions. Way to slow if ever to focus...Will I have better luck with the new 70-200 2.8IS? Any lens recommendations are welcome for other lens in the telephoto category!!

minimum shutter speed with flash

Dear all!

Just a quick question: I set my 5D3 to a minimum shutter speed of 1/125, autoISO, and this works for non-flash photography in Av and P mode.
Putting a speedlite on it, the camera overrides this and drops the shutter spped slower (1/60 or slower). (I know this is how it is ment to be, according to the manual. I find this a strange behaviour, though.)

Question: Is there a way to enforce a minimum shutter speed with a flash on in P or Av mode?

Thanx, Sulla

Rollei

I stopped in at a local estate sale today and saw a vintage Rollei 35I for $5. I could not pass that up. I brought it home, downloaded the owners manual and checked it out. Its working great except for the photo cell which seems to be dead. I have a ton of vintage cameras, and now there is one more.

These are pocket sized 35mm cameras. The 40mm lens pulls out and locks in order to take photos. The red highlights a tiny dent in the cover.

Attachments

  • Rollei 35t_0001.png
    Rollei 35t_0001.png
    758.2 KB · Views: 210
  • Rollei 35t_0002.png
    Rollei 35t_0002.png
    513.4 KB · Views: 184

why has canon converted to 82mm filter size?

The newest version of the 16-35 and 24-70 F2.8 lenses have 82mm filters. Previous versions had 77mm filters.

5mm is not a lot of distance (0.5 cm or 0.2 inches). The additional barrel size is not due to added IS - neither the 16-35 II F2.8 or 24-70 II F2.8 have IS.

Wonder if Canon made the front of the lens just a tiny bit smaller than the barrel to allow 77mm filters. With the 24-70 would not have vignette, perhaps a challenge for the 16-35?

Natural Textures

I was combing a beach on Vancouver Island a couple of months ago and came across this interesting driftwood. I assume the holes were made by some kind of marine borer but don't really know.

Attachments

  • _MG_5428_DxO.jpg
    _MG_5428_DxO.jpg
    365.1 KB · Views: 376
  • _MG_5430_DxO.jpg
    _MG_5430_DxO.jpg
    400 KB · Views: 362
  • _MG_5431_DxO.jpg
    _MG_5431_DxO.jpg
    368.8 KB · Views: 359
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Patent: 50-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO for EF-S & EF-M

HTML:
<p>That patent train continues for EF-M lens optical formulas, this time we see a 50-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO lens for APS-C sized sensors. This optical formula patent shows the lens for both EF-M and EF-S mounts. It’s definitely interesting to see diffractive optics development for consumer grade cameras.</p>
<p>Patent Publication No. 2016-57444 (Google Translated)</p>
<ul>
<li>Published 2016.4.21</li>
<li>Filing date 2014.9.9</li>
</ul>
<p>Example 1</p>
<ul>
<li>Zoom ratio 5.59</li>
<li>Focal length 51.77 135.00 289.53</li>
<li>F-number 4.65 5.05 5.85</li>
<li>Half angle of view (degrees) 14.78 5.78 2.70</li>
<li>Image height 13.66 13.66 13.66</li>
<li>The total lens length 126.05 169.37 184.15</li>
<li>BF 35.50 35.50 35.50</li>
</ul>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Example 2</p>
<ul>
<li>Zoom ratio 5.90</li>
<li>Focal length 49.13 135.00 290.00</li>
<li>F-number 4.65 4.95 5.85</li>
<li>Half angle of view (degrees) 15.54 5.78 2.70</li>
<li>Image height 13.66 13.66 13.66</li>
<li>The total lens length 108.00 152.12 168.00</li>
<li>BF 15.69 15.69 15.69</li>
</ul>
<p>We have yet to see any full frame optical formulas for a full frame mirrorless camera body. We don’t find this surprising as we expect any such camera be compatible with EF lenses.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Sony Sensor Production Affected by Recent Earthquakes

HTML:
<em>Postponement of the Announcement of the Consolidated Results Forecast for the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2017 due to the Impact of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes</em></p>
<p>Due to the earthquake of April 14, 2016 and subsequent earthquakes in the Kumamoto region, Sony Corporation (“Sony”) expects that it will be unable to formulate the forecast for its consolidated results for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2017 in the usual timeframe. Accordingly, Sony will postpone the announcement of the forecast when it announces the actual consolidated results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, scheduled for April 28, 2016, and plans to announce the forecast in May 2016.</p>
<p>Operations at Sony Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation’s Kumamoto Technology Center (located in Kikuchi Gun, Kumamoto Prefecture) were halted after the earthquakes and remain suspended. The extent of the damage caused by the earthquakes is being evaluated and preparations for the rehabilitation of the site are underway, with priority being placed on the safety of employees. Measures to minimize the impact on business operations are also under consideration.</p>
<p>The survey of damage to the Kumamoto Technology Center conducted so far has revealed damage to certain parts of the building, clean rooms and production equipment. The timeframe for resuming operations has yet to be determined. The Kumamoto Technology Center is the primary manufacturing site for image sensors for digital cameras and security cameras as well as for micro-display devices.</p>
<p>The impact of the earthquakes on Sony’s consolidated results continues to be evaluated. The suspension of operations at the Kumamoto Technology Center may have an adverse impact on Sony’s operating results, particularly in the Devices and Imaging Products & Solutions segments. In addition, the earthquakes have caused damage to the manufacturing facilities of certain third-party suppliers of components to Sony, the impact of which on Sony’s business operations is currently being evaluated.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

New Battery Grip for EOS 5D Mark IV & More [CR2]

HTML:
Information for the EOS 5D Mark IV is coming in slowly.</p>
<p>We’re told that the new EOS 5D Mark IV, which will be announced in August will have a new battery grip, the BG-E20. We don’t know at this time if the new camera will use an LP-E6 series battery or not, though we hope it does.</p>
<p>There is no dedicated external wifi transmitter coming for the camera, so that seems to confirm that wifi will be built-in to the EOS 5D Mark IV.</p>
<p>We’re also told that the EOS 5D Mark IV will see the return of the red autofocus point in AI servo mode.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Proudly removing my EF 400mm f/5.6L from my inventory!

A young man I've been mentoring bought my 70D and kit lens a while back. Well, yesterday he called me and said he'd saved up the money to buy my 400mm f/5.6L.

It is a great lens, but not one I cannot do without since I can put my Canon EF 2X III on the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II when I need 400 mm. After AFMA I get solid photos with the extender and lens.

Josh will be heading to Alaska to work fish processing and may stay there. I think the 400MM will serve him well there.

I'm doing mostly portrait work now (hobby) and the 400mm rarely gets used. I think if I buy a long lens again I'll save my pennies for a 600 f/4L and skip 400mm altogether.

Josh is a good kid, but comes from a very troubled family. I wish him well and have been happy to watch him learn that he doesn't have to take the road the rest of his family has taken. He just turned 18 this past month and has decided to take the high road.

You could say that photography has saved a young man from an otherwise bleak future. :) That is such a good thing for boys like him.

Let's keep shooting and if we can pass on the glory of this great field, hobby or pro, to the young of this world.

Tips for cleaning a recessed rear element on a lens?

Hey gang,

Any tips for cleaning a rear element of a lens that is recessed a good distance from the mount?

I clumsily got a thumbprint on the rear element of my 100L. It's a good 10mm recessed or so and that recession is 'felted'/textured like the inside of a hood, so it grabs at cleaning cloths as I go -- getting to the periphery of that rear element is a bit tricky as a result. Is there was a better cleaning play than my typical microfiber + ROR solution? Is there any tips or tricks to share? Perhaps use a finer pressure tool behind the microfiber than my finger, perhaps a Q-tip or something?

Thx,
A

A glimpse at automated AFMA from Nikon

Now showing on the D5 and D500, a feature we might like:

http://www.dpreview.com/news/3468248279/nikons-automated-af-fine-tune-explained

...but the implementation seems very crude and simple. Play the video in the link. Yes, it's better than having to futz around with an incrementally marked target setup, but it appears to only work at one focus distance.

Here's hoping that Canon can do better.

- A

EF 11-24 f/4.0

Just had my first couple of days with my EF 11-24 f/4.0. Very very happy with the lens. Actually used it as walk-around lens during a long week-end in Venice Italy. Prefer it so much over the EF 16-35 f/2.8. Yes, CA is there but much much much better than with 16-35. Corners are reasonably sharp at f/4 wide open and almost perfect at f/8 - something which is never the case with my (copy of the) 16-35. Picture below shot at 11mm, ISO 1600, f/8, 1/40s handheld.

Attachments

  • 5D3_5261.jpg
    5D3_5261.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 176

SLR grip for iPhone

http://bokeh.digitalrev.com/article/dslr-your-iphone-with-sound-activated-smartphone-grip-pictar

I roll my eyes at most 'mobile camera bolt-ons', but this isn't a super terrible idea. Give your camera's current sensor the grip, cold shoe, tripod mount, stable shutter button and dedicated controls it needs. Apparently it communicates with the phone with sound (picked up through the microphone) for lower power consumption than full time bluetooth.

Still have no idea how an aperture wheel works for a lens fixed at f/2.2, though... ::)

But hey, it (and the native phone) have spot metering at any AF point. Available now everywhere except for most Canon products.

- A

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,611
Members
24,804
Latest member
chrisgphoto

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB