Threads

Canon Rumors · Apr 15, 2015

HTML:

After yesterday’s rehashing of past rumors in a package mimicking new information, EOSHD is reporting the 4K video reports in the EOS “5D” line are untrue.</p>
<blockquote><p>…..the company believes a 4K 5D Mark IV would completely overshadow the recently released C100 Mark II and so wouldn’t happen, but that Canon LOG would likely go into the camera to allow shot-matching with the XC10.</p></blockquote>
<p>This sounds completely plausible. I get the feeling that Canon doesn’t see a big future in DSLRs for serious video productions and will try to further grow their Super 35 Cinema EOS cameras instead. The XC10 is the odd camera in the strategy, but we’ll reserve judgement until we hear from people that have used it in the field.</p>
<p>We can’t confirm a “5Dc”, but we can confirm that we were told there would be 3 “5D” cameras in 2015 and that we’ve already seen 2 of them.</p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://www.eoshd.com/2015/04/canon-5d-mark-iv-will-be-1080p-with-canon-log/" target="_blank">EOSHD</a>]</p>

TWI by Dustin Abbott · Apr 15, 2015

Hello everyone. There are a lot of exciting new options in the wide angle department for Canon users, but I recently spent time with one that's been around for a couple of years and really enjoyed using it. Some of you are fans of Zeiss glass and would probably enjoy taking a look at some of these pieces.

Written Review: http://bit.ly/1DpXzNN
Video Review: http://bit.ly/1GhByPZ
Interactive Image Quality Examination Video: http://bit.ly/1NCoIwq
Image Gallery: http://bit.ly/1DvNy00

WorkonSunday · Apr 15, 2015

can really do with a 18-70 or 16-70 like Sony's 16-70 F4 lens. very compact, good range, good aperture, decent sharpness....

or a pancake zoom would be good as well.

Hector1970 · Apr 15, 2015

Hi All
I'm not very good with video technology so I can't look up the right term.
I took a video of a parade.
It looks fine except when something moves past.
Not sure how to describe it but it's hard on the eyes to watch.
It's like a small movement or breaking up of the moving object.
It's not that perceptible at first glance.
Any idea of what that might be?
If someone does know how might it be overcome.
Is it by having ia faster frame rate (or a slower one)?
The camera is on default settings (I think)
Is there any other setting to turn on / off?
Hopefully my explanation isn't too vague.
I find it hard to explain it.
Never suggested possible things to look up would be good.

Canon Rumors · Apr 15, 2015

HTML:

Firmware Version 1.1.4 incorporates the following fixes and improvements:</p>
<ol>
<li>Fixes a phenomenon in which focus may not be adjusted with specific lenses when shooting remotely with EOS Utility software.</li>
<li>Fixes a phenomenon in which “LCD brightness” may not be adjusted after pressing the SET button if “Menu Display” is assigned to the SET button in the Custom Functions setting (C.Fn-7).</li>
<li>Enhances the reliability of the built-in flash exposure.</li>
</ol>
<p><a href="http://usa.canon.com/cusa/support/consumer/eos_slr_camera_systems/eos_digital_slr_cameras/eos_rebel_t5i_18_55mm_is_stm_lens_kit#DriversAndSoftware" target="_blank">Download Firmware 1.1.4 at Canon USA</a></p>

niels123 · Apr 15, 2015

Currently I have the Canon 24 f/2.8 IS (non-L), the Sigma 50 art and the Canon 40 f/2.8 pancake.

I use the 50 art a lot for indoor shooting in low light (mainly at f/1.4 to f/2), but I find it sometimes a bit too narrow on my 5D III. Often f/2.8 is not enough in low light for me. Therefore, I consider getting a 35 art next to my 50.

How is the autofocus on this lens? What are your experiences? How accurate does it focus using center focus? How accurate does it focus using cross-type points on ~1/3rd of the sensor?

How likely is it that we will see a nice new Canon 35 f/1.4 in the next 12 months?

AKChui · Apr 14, 2015

I was checking the eBay prices for a used EF 28-135 f3.5-5.6 USM for a friend, and happened to notice this rather funny description blurb (automatically added to all the ads for this lens). Not sure if the writer was totally clueless or if this is a worse than usual google translation—I’ve bolded some of the more humorous parts.

Product Information

Compact and lightweight, the Canon EF USM F/3.5 lens is designed for digital cameras to capture bright panoramic photos. The focal length of this Canon IS lens automatically adjusts between 28 mm and 135 mm to shoot magnified images of an object at a minimum focusing distance of 0.5 m. With an aperture range of f/3.5 - 5.6, the Canon EF USM F/3.5 allows you to capture bright outdoor photos. The 18 to 75-degree angle coverage of this 28 mm lens facilitates standard format pictures. The Image stabilization feature helps to capture sharp images using the 28 mm lens even when there are jerks. With a construction of 16 elements in 12 groups, this Canon IS lens provides superior quality images. The 72 mm filter protects the Canon EF USM F/3.5 from dust and graze.

Hard to believe that Canon would sell such an innovative kit lens (automatically adjusting focal lengths and making a fixed focal length serve as a zoom) for so cheap…

RGF · Apr 14, 2015

Imagine that the camera captured an image (exposure based upon Matrix metering) and then allowed you to adjust to that x% of the brightest pixels where 100% of maximum value, or perhaps brightest pixel at 90% of the maximum value, ..

This would be the helpful in exposing to the right.

JohnDizzo15 · Apr 14, 2015

So who around here has bought and/or extensively used a non-canon system from the current generation of tech while maintaining a canon kit?

In the last three years, I have owned/own a 5D3x2, 70D, t5i, 6D, 7D, EOS M, Fuji x100s, xt1, xe2, Sony a7r, Casio ex-100, and a closet full of about 20k worth of lenses.

I am in fact, a Canon fan. But only because I actually enjoy using their products and the results they yield me. Which is precisely why I'm also a fan of other companies as some of them are also able to provide me with intriguing and very useful products with different yields.

The one thing I've always wanted to point out is that there are just way too many web junkies making opinions or statements based on things they've read from other people that have just read what other people on the interwebs have had to say about something. Parroting as it were. Or sometimes, parroting another parrot who may have very well been parroting someone else already.

We can sit here and measurebate, talk about other people's findings, and stroke ourselves all day over them. But who has.....walked the walk? Sound off!!

Kristofgss · Apr 14, 2015

I know there are a number of (expenive) professional kits to provide power to a studio kit on location when no AC is available, but i came across the goalzero products (which are intended for laptops and electronics) and I was wondering, could one of the these like the yeti 150 http://www.goalzero.com/p/164/goal-zero-yeti-150-solar-generator be used to power one or more studio lights? I have elinchrom rx-ones which are only 100Ws. But I have no idea how much power drain they would be on the battery (I'm supposing that that is the limiting factor?)
Any help or tips for portable studio lights would be welcome.

Canon Rumors · Apr 14, 2015

HTML:

<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/SUoP6yD3XHE" width="100%" height="390" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>Kai at DigitalRev has completed his video review of the Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L lens. You can put this in the rather large pile of “this lens is great” reviews.</p>
<p><em>** There is a slight bit of off color language in the review.</em></p>
<p>Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM $2999: <a href="http://adorama.evyy.net/c/60085/51926/1036?u=http://www.adorama.com/CA11244.html" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1119028-REG/canon_9520b002_ef_11_24mm_f_4l_usm.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00T3ERXKE/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00T3ERXKE&linkCode=as2&tag=canorumo-20&linkId=SKIW33AKPAGADHBN" target="_blank">Amazon</a></p>

Canon Rumors · Apr 14, 2015

HTML:

A recycling of past rumors has made its way around again, this time talking about a direct replacement for the EOS 5D Mark III, as well as a cinema version for the 5D line.</p>
<p>First up, the Canon EOS 5Dc. <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2015/02/possible-canon-eos-5d-mark-iv-spec-talk-cr2/" target="_blank">These specs first appeared back in February</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li>18MP</li>
<li>61 point AF system</li>
<li>ISO 100-204.800</li>
<li>4k video (source says Canon has yet to define the frame rate)</li>
<li>Dual Pixel AF III</li>
<li>Many advanced video features</li>
<li>Features taken from Canon’s Cinema cameras</li>
</ul>
<p>Second up, the EOS 5D Mark IV. <a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_5d4.html" target="_blank">This megapixel count first appeared in March</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li>28MP sensor</li>
<li>12fps</li>
<li>Dual Pixel AF III</li>
<li>New and more advanced AF system (compared to EOS 5D Mark III), apparently it will not be the same AF as the 5D Mark IVc</li>
<li>Anti-flickr technology (seen first on the EOS 7D Mark II)</li>
<li>Crop mode (featured on the EOS 5Ds)</li>
<li>ISO 100-204.800 (expandable to 409.600)</li>
</ul>
<p>Before the EOS 5DS & EOS 5DS R launch, we had heard there would be 3 cameras carrying the “5D” moniker, and we assumed the EOS 5DS “R” was one of the cameras. However, in the last few months, there has been talk that the EOS-1D C would be replaced by a 5D style cinema DSLR camera. If the EOS 5Dc rumor is true and it’s priced in the $3500 range like all of the “5D” cameras, that would make the XC10 & C100 Mark II tougher sells than they already are.</p>
<p>This is interesting to say the least, but we can’t confirm how likely this set of rumors is.</p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://www.canonwatch.com/cw4-canon-eos-5d-mark-iv-coming-as-2-versions-5d-mark-iv-mark-ivc-28mp-vs-18mp/" target="_blank">CanonWatch</a>]</p>

Canon Rumors · Apr 14, 2015

HTML:

<p>DXOMark has completed their review of the Sigma 24mm f/1.4 DG Art lens. According to DXO, the Sigma holds up very well against the Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II, one of my favourite lenses in the Canon lineup.</p>
<p>From DXOMark</p>
<blockquote><p>Although at first sight the Sigma’s overall DxOMark score might not look as convincing as the two previous Art models from the maker, it is important to look deeper than the numbers suggest, especially at shorter focal lengths. The Sigma 24mm f1.4 DG HSMis the finest 24mm we’ve seen, although against the Canon 24mm f1.4L II USM, it’s a close-run thing. That model has slightly higher peak sharpness centrally at f4-5.6, but the Sigma has more uniform performance overall, including superior control of CA and distortion.</p></blockquote>
<p> </p>
<div id="attachment_19745" style="width: 585px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/sigma24mmcompare.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-19745" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/sigma24mmcompare-575x471.jpg" alt="Comparison: SIgma 24mm f/1.4 DG Art - Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II - Samyang 24mm f/1.4 ED - Click for Larger" width="575" height="471" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Comparison: SIgma 24mm f/1.4 DG Art – Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II – Samyang 24mm f/1.4 ED – Click for Larger</p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Sigma-24mm-F1.4-DG-HSM-A-Canon-EF-review-Better-by-design" target="_blank">

Read the full review at DXOMark</a> | Sigma 24mm f/1.4 Art $849: <a href="http://adorama.evyy.net/c/60085/51926/1036?u=http://www.adorama.com/SG2414CA.html%20" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1120085-REG/sigma_24mm_f_1_4_dg_hsm.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a></p>

Aglet · Apr 14, 2015

Quoted excerpt from their conclusion:

".. the Sigma has more uniform performance overall, including superior control of CA and distortion. It’s a worthy addition to the range and will only add to the maker’s reputation. Plus at around half the price of the Canon.."

www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Sigma-24mm-F1.4-DG-HSM-A-Canon-EF-review-Better-by-design/Conclusion

Sounds like Sigma's gonna show the OEMs how to make mainstream lenses and leave Canon to what they're really good at, niche products.
Apparently Sigma's patented a 400/2.8 as well. Last time I spoke to a Sigma rep they sounded like they were gonna put more effort into primes.
I've only purchased one MFT Sigma prime, the 60mm f/2.8. it's a smokin' hot performance for $200!

EDIT; yup, if you need to shoot a 24mm wide open, the Sigma wins. by f/2.8 they're about the same for sharpness. Could use some bokeh comparison tho. :-\

Dylan777 · Apr 14, 2015

Anyone?

http://www.tipa.com/english/XXV_tipa_awards_2015.html

expatinasia · Apr 13, 2015

What are your thoughts on this new camera and how do you think it will affect the Canon Cinema and other Canon video lines?

Blackmagic URSA Mini 4.6K EF

Compact and lightweight digital film camera with high performance 4.6K Super 35 sensor with up to 15 stops of dynamic range, EF lens mount, 12G-SDI, 5” fold out monitor, dual CFast recorders and more!

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagicursamini

Fatalv · Apr 13, 2015

I have the option of picking up a high quality telephoto lens with some savings. Originally I was looking at a high end telescope for some astro photography work but have been leaning towards a telephoto instead. I've been pleasantly happy with my 70-200 f/2.8 IS II and other L glass for astro and have been interested something longer for birding/wildlife.

So… which would you choose?

Current gear is 7D/5DMK3. 8-15 f/4L, 16-35 f/2.8 II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 50 1.4, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 2x Extender III.

As a side note, I've used the 2x extender on the 70-200 with mixed results. Do the extenders perform better on the telephotos listed? Optimized for primes by chance?

I was currently leaning towards the 400 f2.8 strictly for the light gathering ability for astro work and the ability to stack extenders and still have autofocus. But I keep wondering if I should go longer since I'm likely to only afford to own one of these lenses.

Thanks in advance for the advice!

Canon Rumors · Apr 13, 2015

HTML:

Canon USA has issued instant savings on a lot of cinema lenses for both EF and PL mounts. You can save up to $5000 on single lenses and up to $6000 on bundles.</p>
<p>INSTANT SAVINGS ON THE FOLLOWING LENSES</p>
<ul>
<li>CN-E 14mm T/3.1</li>
<li>CN-E 24mm T/1.5</li>
<li>CN-E 35mm T/1.5</li>
<li>CN-E 50mm T/1.3</li>
<li>CN-E 85mm T/1.3</li>
<li>CN-E 135mm T/2.2</li>
<li>CN-E 14.5-60mm T2.6</li>
<li>CN-E15.5-47mm T2.8</li>
<li>CN-E 30-300mm T2.95-3.7</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/Canon-Cinema-Lenses/ci/27520/N/3806301838/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">View all the lenses & bundles at B&H Photo</a></strong></p>

AcutancePhotography · Apr 13, 2015

http://petapixel.com/2015/04/12/this-photographer-built-the-ultimate-camera-suit/

This photographer was spotted taking pictures at an anime street festival in Osaka, Japan, with a crazy DIY camera rig that covered his upper body. The kit included three DSLRs, three off camera flashes, multiple action cameras, a smartphone, an external hard drive, and more.

Surapon, was that you? ;D

Canon Rumors · Apr 13, 2015

HTML:

We’ve heard in the past that Sigma is working on super telephoto lenses, namely a 500mm f/4 OS. Now a patent has appeared for a 400mm f/2.8 OS lens from Sigma. I think the biggest challenge for Sigma in this area is going to be autofocus. Super telephoto lenses are the least forgiving when it comes to focus accuracy in most situations.</p>
<p><strong>Patent Publication No. 2015-64436 (Google Translated)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Published 2015.4.9</li>
<li>Filing date 2013.9.4</li>
</ul>
<p>Example 1</p>
<ul>
<li>Focal length 390.00mm</li>
<li>Fno. 2.91</li>
<li>Total angle of view 2ω 6.29 °</li>
<li>Image height Y 21.63mm</li>
<li>Overall length of the lens 353.00mm</li>
<li>Positive, positive positive and negative negative 5-group configuration</li>
<li>Inner Focus (fourth group)</li>
<li>Anti-vibration (part of the fifth group)</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2015-04-13" target="_blank">EG</a>]</p>

faz · Apr 13, 2015

Please can anyone know what is the difference b/w these 2 Lense ?
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM VS Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM ?? Use of this one seems to be more of a portrait pictures
What is the use of this one Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM ?

Thanks
Faz

PureClassA · Apr 12, 2015

http://nofilmschool.com/2015/04/blackmagic-about-announce-ursa-mini-15-stops-dynamic-range

Canon made a nice rig with the C300, but for $16000 in the US it's a beast of a price tag. They don't seem to want to compete in the sub $10k market for 4k resolution, where there seems to be a lot of activity.

Not only is black magic set to intro a new URSA Mini at NAB, but the new URSA firmware references a MkII sensor ... presumably to be unveiled tomorrow with 15 stops of DR and will shoot 120FPS in 4K RAW.... Yeah. All for $5995

If this new V2 sensor addresses the FPN everyone bemoans about BlackMagic for, then this thing will steal the show.

Richard8971 · Apr 12, 2015

A couple of years ago I was in the market for an "L" class zoom and the 100-400 was the one I was looking at for it's image quality and reach.

A friend of mine had one and she let me borrow it for the day. I loved the reach and image quality but hated the push-pull design. I couldn't make myself like it, no matter how much I tried.

The EF 70-300L was fairly new at the time so I bought one of those instead. Other than not getting the 400mm on the long end like I wanted, this has been a fantastic lens. Super AF speed and amazing image quality. I even love how light and compact it is. But now the new 100-400L is out and has the rotating zoom like I wanted.

Question is, I still want a 400. Is the new 100-400 THAT much better than the 70-300L to justify selling my 70-300L to then dump another $1200 or so on the new 100-400?

Ken Rockwell noted in his review how fast the AF was on the new 400. How does it compare to the 70-300?

I have read the reviews but some advice from someone who has both lenses would be appreciated. Thanks!

D

Canon Rumors · Apr 12, 2015

HTML:

<p>We’ll be involved in a Live Blog that will be running all week for NAB 2015 in Las Vegas, which was organized by <a href="http://www.planet5d.com" target="_blank">Mitch at Planet5D</a>. Almost 30 sites will be updating from the show floor and it’ll all be here in one live feed.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://v.24liveblog.com/live/?id=1259914" width="100%" height="90000px" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto"></iframe></p>

d · Apr 12, 2015

Just curious to hear about people's experiences using the 70-200mm 2.8 IS II at 200mm when focused at infinity.

I'm struggling the get decently sharp shots when shooting with this FL and distance - images lack the crispness that I get when using a shorter focal length, or with closer focus distances.

Initially thought it was my technique and/or AF back or front focus, but did a little test the other night shooting the moon, and after locking the lens off on the tripod, using LV to focus, and shooting with mirror up and delay mode (and stopping down to both f/4 and f/5.6) was still underwhelmed with the results.

Just wondering is this is generally considered a weak area of this lens, or whether I maybe need to get Canon to take a look at my copy?

Cheers,
d.

Threads

Threads

Attachments

Poll Poll If you could have only one...

400 f/2.8 II

500 f/4 II

600 f/4 II

200-400 f/4

Filter

Forum statistics

Gallery statistics

Poll

If you could have only one...