Using full frame lens on crop body cameras ?

From the video I've posted below, it looks as though it's a (big) waste of money to purchase high rent full frame glass for a crop body including the all new 7D mark II.
I'm disappointed with this as it "was" my intention.
So, I hope someone will clarify this for me but it seems that with the new 7D mark II will actually produce better results/sharper images with a cheaper lens that is made for a crop body? To my knowledge, Canon doesn't produce any high quality glass for their crop sensor cameras?

I wanted the 7D mark II with a Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens. If what I'm seeing in the video below is correct and I sure would assume so, that this combination is a total waste of money.

Perhaps I should wait to see if Canon is soon to release a new version of the 5D mark III?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDbUIfB5YUc&list=PLBE338967F8DB7F2A

24-70 2.8L mark II image quality

Was wondering if anyone out there could help me out a little bit: I am on my second copy of this lens, first one made a ticking sound when zooming in/out, so sent it back and got another. Being bored at home one day and hearing about how this lens trumps/is equal to some primes, I printed off one of those sharpness tests, pined it to the wall and went about comparing the lens to my 100mm 2.8L macro. settings were the same (shutter 1/80, @ f/2.8, camera was on a tripod, used remote shutter, and the IS was off on 100mm, I also used flash so ISO was 400 for both)
I did move the camera back with the 100mm mounted, keeping the chart roughly the same frame to frame, and I shot the 24-70 II @ 70mm. Now while the center of the photo is hard to tell apart, as you go to the any of the corners of the photos, the 100mm is clearly the champ in that regard. I was wondering if the 24-70 II is just not that great (contrary from what you hear) wide open and towards the corners, or if i have a defective one. I know one is a prime, different focal lengths etc etc, but i figured it would be a little close in image quality. If anyone one else had a copy of this lens, and would do the sharpness test that would be great, or if you have more experience with this lens, and this is or is not the norm too. I am just looking for some backing to see if I should send it back again, or keep it and stop having buyers remorse. Thanks in advance and I'll post some corner crops so you can see what I am rambling on about, the first should be the 24-70mm II and second the 100mm

Attachments

  • 70-1.jpg
    70-1.jpg
    697 KB · Views: 232
  • 100-1.jpg
    100-1.jpg
    884.7 KB · Views: 184

please help to understand the lens issue

An used 70-200mm-f-4L-IS is on sale, but the sellers mentions the following problem.
I could not quite get that. Can you please explain the following issue?


"I recently realized that there is a known flaw known as Focus Slipping in this line of canon lenses and unfortunately this unit is also affected by it. The focus goes from 1.2 meters to infinity smoothly but does not turn back from there while in manual focus. In auto focus it moves both ways but is sluggish while going from 3 meters to 1.2 meters. It achieves perfect focus from 1.5 meters to infinity. For this reason I'm pricing this lens at a low price, it's still a functional lens with a semi-functional focus system. The lens came in like this from Canon so this issue was not caused by any mishandling on my part, unfortunately I realized it a bit too late to get it fixed under warranty, in fact I found out about it only when I decided to sell the lens. This is an As Is sale with no returns as I have shared everything there is to know about this lens."

http://www.ebay.in/itm/CANON-EF-70-200mm-f-4L-IS-USM-LENS-/261699401367?pt=IN_SLR_Camera_Lenses_Optics&hash=item3cee7ff697

1dc life span

Hi.
I have been using the 1dc as second camera on features lately and also renting it out quite a bit. So much so that it seems like I need to buy another body to keep up with rentals.
My concern is that what if something new with internal 4k recording is released into the market soon, the resale value of the 1dc will drop dramatically.
What do you all think? Thanks for any suggestions.

Resurrection, of the posting kind.

Hi Folks.
Is it me or are we getting a whole lot of 1 or 2yr old posts about scams etc resurrected by 1st time posters recently?
I have been going to reply to a couple of them then checked the previous post because I thought I recognised the thread from my early days.
A lot of long serving members are then sucked in, adding to the momentum, can we get these older scam posts locked so they are there for reference only or would that be too difficult?
Just a thought, perhaps it is only me that it bothers?
Please understand I don't see resurrecting an interesting post as a sin, just the scam ones! ;D

Cheers, Graham.

Confused about Crop Effect...after I thought I had it.

Hello all-

I've seen several posts lately which have left me confused. My understanding of the crop factor (1.6x in Canon's case) is that FOV is decreased by 1.6x, effectively cropping the photo. It doesn't replace focal length in that you do not gain additional telephoto compression. However, this crop effect could still be useful to the focal length limited photographer (let's say 300IS II + 2x TC III as opposed to a 500 or 600 prime) because to crop a FF image in post throws out pixels, while a sensor forced crop puts relatively greater number of pixels on target (ie a 7d2 vs a 5d3).

Now I've read posts alluding to a "real" benefit of closer to 1.2x due to increased camera movement. Why? Would this camera movement not also occur at a comparable FOV on FF? Would a 300 + 1.4x not have roughly the same movement as a 400?

Thanks in advance for clearing this up.

Mirror sticking and USB problem on my 7D...

I bought my 7D new back in Sept of 2011 and I have gone through about 60K clicks, give or take a thousand. Lately, the mirror will seem to "stick" after taking a shot. The photo comes out fine but you can hear a delay in the mirror returning. It doesn't happen all the time but enough and it happens more frequently now.

I had been meaning to send it in to be cleaned/replaced but a couple of weeks ago my USB port went out on the camera too. I have tried different cords and computers and nothing. I have tested my computers and cords with some of my other cameras and they work fine. It started out with an error saying "USB device not recognized or has malfunctioned" and now when I plug it in I don't even get that, it's like the camera is off.

Granted I don't use my USB port on my camera much anyway because I have a card reader, it just bothers me that it stopped working and may be a sign of something else going wrong.

I love my 7D and really don't want to replace it (or upgrade to the 7D2) for $$$ reasons first off. I don't want to dump $1800 on a new camera and fixing mine will still be cheaper than buying even a used 7D.

Question is, when I send it in to have the mirror checked so I even bother with the USB port? Is it separate enough of a thing that it's demise will not affect other electronic parts of my camera?

I also have a 6D that I use for when I need/want a FF camera. My 7D is when I go shooting wildlife.

Thanks for any thoughts you may have.

D

Review: Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Apo Planar T*

HTML:
<p>I never really get bored of reading about this lens. I’ll never own one, but it’s sure a lot of fun to talk about it. Dustin Abbott has completed his review of the Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 for Canon, and as always, it’s quite thorough.</p>
<p><strong>From Dustin

</strong><em>“The Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Planar T* ZE is big and heavy. It is extremely expensive. It is manual focus only. But you already knew that. Perhaps you have already written this lens off because of those facts. But shooting with this lens is a revelation. Having used it for a while leaves me feeling that the weight and price may just be justified…if one can afford it. It is good enough and versatile enough that many shooters would better off owning fewer lenses to afford this one, and has caused me to mentally catalog my own collection and wonder what I would be willing to part with to aid that acquisition. If nothing else, the Otus 85 is most definitely on my wish list.”</em><strong>

</strong></p>
<p>Below is the video review of the lens, you can also read the text review and see the sample images gallery through the links below.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-cbMwnn7s1U?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://bit.ly/1wyAOni" target="_blank">Read the full review</a> | <a href="http://bit.ly/12v4IuX" target="_blank">View the sample gallery</a> | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1077281-REG/zeiss_2040_292_otus_apo_planar_85mm.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 at B&H Photo</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Opinion: Does Cinema EOS Mark the End of High Spec Canon DSLR Video?

HTML:
<p><a href="http://www.eoshd.com/2014/11/cinema-eos-mark-end-high-spec-canon-dslr-video/" target="_blank">Andrew at EOSHD.com</a> has posted an opinion piece on the future of high spec video features in Canon DSLRs. I’ve had this conversation with people in the past, and I feel somewhat the way Andrew does, in that I don’t see Canon speccing DSLRs as well as future Cinema EOS products. While I have been told a video focused DSLR is coming for NAB 2015, it won’t be a high end professional product.</p>
<p>There was a year when all I saw on videographer rigs was Canon DSLR cameras, but it seems that time has passed. I now see a lot of Cinema EOS cameras as well as smaller offerings from other manufacturers, and I do believe Canon wants videographers using C100’s as opposed to 5D Mark IIIs..</p>
<p>I agree with some of the points at EOSHD, but disagree with others. For Canon, it’s about making money and understanding markets with growth potential and markets in decline. The professional high margin segment is probably where the best chance of growth lies. I think selling more cameras and lenses to Hollywood along with support services is a much better strategy to grow revenue, and more importantly income, than it would be to offer a $2000 4K mirrorless camera for enthusiasts.</p>
<p>We’ll see how the next few years shapes up, and I expect 2015 will give us lots of hints of where Canon sees the future of videography & cinematography going.</p>
<p><strong>From EOSHD

</strong><em>“If Canon announced that they were withdrawing from the enthusiast stills camera market, you’d be surprised. It’s a pretty big market. But withdraw from the enthusiast video market they almost certainly have at the moment, whether they meant to do or not.</em></p>
<p><em><span id="more-14592"></span>Whilst we ponder Canon’s deeply uninspired 2014 in terms of technological innovation, consider this theory – Canon entered the enthusiast DSLR video market by accident and now they have pulled out of it by accident.</em></p>
<p><em>Whether they like it or not, Canon DSLRs are no longer 1st, 2nd, 3rd or even 4th best performing enthusiast options for video. Nikon, Sony, Panasonic and Samsung are all significantly ahead, and if we count Blackmagic (they’re actually more pro than enthusiast) Canon are down to 6th. Just 2 years ago they were 1st. What happened?”</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.eoshd.com/2014/11/cinema-eos-mark-end-high-spec-canon-dslr-video/" target="_blank"><strong>Read the full article</strong></a></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Review: Canon EOS 7D Mark II

HTML:
<p>DPReview has completed their review of the Canon EOS 7D Mark II and it’s extremely positive. They make a special effort to stress this camera is not an incremental update to the original EOS 7D.</p>
<p><strong>From the review</strong>

<em>“It would be easy to write off the EOS 7D Mark II as just an incremental upgrade to the original 7D, but that would be a serious mistake. The two cameras may share the number 7 and the letter D on their bodies, but inside they are very different machines.</em></p>
<p><em>With the 7D II Canon is putting a stake in the ground that it is committed to the crop sensor market. Although it will likely be seen as an aspirational camera for novices, or an upgrade path to people using more consumer oriented crop sensor bodies from Canon, the 7D II is unquestionably a pro camera. It’s built like a tank, has the control layout of a 5D Mark III and an autofocus system to compete with the 1D X.</em></p>
<p><em>Canon has added lots of tools to the Mark II, but one deserves special mention. Dual-Pixel autofocus may be one of the most important, and yet under-appreciated, technologies introduced to digital cameras in a long time. It’s significant that Canon now includes this technology on their Cinema EOS cameras. Canon still seems to be dialing in the optimal implementation for the technology, but it will be exciting to see how it evolves.”</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-7d-mark-ii" target="_blank">Read the full review</a> </strong>| <strong><strong><strong><strong>EOS 7D Mark II in stock $1799: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1081808-REG/canon_9128b002_eos_7d_mark_ii.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NEWZDRG/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00NEWZDRG&linkCode=as2&tag=canorumo-20&linkId=4IHYPE3ZKJN5VL4X" target="_blank">Amazon</a></strong></strong></strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Tamron [email protected] distance

Just done an image size check of the moon this morning at 600 and the same at 400 on both Canon 100-400 and the 400/5.6.

Image size for the Canons was the same but the Tamron was almost exactly 1.50 times bigger i.e. with the Tamron at distance (say beyond 100m) you get the full 600mm. Obviously this falls dramatically with multi element zooms as your operating distance gets down towards close focus.

Brian Carnahan quotes a figure of 570mm but does not say what the calibration distance was.

100-400 II - first shots

just picked up 100-400 II
no micro adjust... sun was fading fast...and a windstorm developing... walked out to Burnside PortlandOregon

a few shots... before I had to be somewhere else...

also tried the tamron sp pro 1.4x tc...
noticed a slightly slower focus speed...


overall the lens is rugged, compact.....sits next to 24-105 f4...well...

that is about what I wanted...
it is NOT an f2.8 70-200 zoom ...about 2 stops gone there.....
and I have no idea how well it does compared to 70-200 @ 400 with canon 2x TC......
mine was pretty good ...focus lagged a bit...

but this is smaller....which is where I have moved this cycle..
still have 14 II, sig 35, 85 f1.2 and macro for all thos specialized shots...

but this lens ..with the 24-105, and close focus, takes the 500 diopter, my polarizer so it could travel ...well....

lots of shooting to do...
this is first hour..
and you will surely see lots of great shots from others ...

I passed on the 100-400 pump... but this one seems right for me..

by the way....the packing job on the lens is amazing...
good grief..... this is so carefully thought thru....
they could have a teevee show/contest...for people to try to repack it just like it came....
no one would win

yes...I did get turned around with zoom up front... but getting adjusted now....
...
some award winning shots to follow..
last two are tamron sp pro TC... 560mm

again no micro adjust...5d3


thanks CanonRumors for a great group to read/learn from...and an easy place to exchange ideas...

Attachments

  • Image01.jpg
    Image01.jpg
    675 KB · Views: 385
  • Image02.jpg
    Image02.jpg
    651.9 KB · Views: 318
  • Image03.jpg
    Image03.jpg
    688.5 KB · Views: 294
  • Image04.jpg
    Image04.jpg
    514.8 KB · Views: 752
  • Image05.jpg
    Image05.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 323
  • Image06.jpg
    Image06.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 323
  • Image07.jpg
    Image07.jpg
    872.6 KB · Views: 301

Re: New review of old 16-35 F/2.8 II

I've owned this lens before and agree it is a great lens but I feel the review is misleading or at least unfair. It says the 16-35 F/2.8 II has superior optics to the 17-40L... it doesn't. I've owned several copies of both. Not to say it isn't good, neither is it necessarily worse... but superior? No. The 17-40 F4L is actually slightly optically "superior" if i had to give a nod to one. But it's so small it's not worth mentioning. Go take a look at The Digital Picture test charts. It's roughly the same throughout all apertures and focal lengths with a slight edge going to the 17-40--duh it's simpler in terms of internals and doesn't have to bend as much light. (to put it in caveman terms) Of course, the 16-35 F4 IS beats both hands down. The only reason to own the 16-35 is if you absolutely need 2.8. But I suspect at F4 and a strobe of some sort, you'll have more than enough... not to mention better depth of field =)

The review also shows how "awesome' this lens is and gives many example shots. And they are great shots... but those shots are stopped down--could've been taken with a lighter (optically equivalent) 17-40L or with superior 16-35 F4 IS. So not sure what the point of the review is.

I've owned about three copies of the 16-35 2.8 II and 7-10 of the 17-40L. Both are great but found the 17-40L the easier lens to justify. I now own the 16-35 F4 IS and am very impressed by it. Now that is an optically superior lens.

I mistakenly had this in "JPG" when I shot it but you get the idea. I love my 16-35 F4!

15384646946_87d226f504_c.jpg


http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00K8942SO/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00K8942SO&linkCode=as2&tag=il734-20&linkId=CRVDZTWMJWH5AGJA

http://www.canonrumors.com/reviews/review-canon-ef-16-35mm-f2-8l-ii/

Dpreview: Review of the 7D2

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/9654262477/canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-review

Dpreview writes:
"If you can justify the price tag it's hard to fault Canon's new APS-C flagship. With class-leading image quality, fast operation and excellent handling the EOS 7D is everything a semi-pro model should be--and the excellent movie mode will be a welcome bonus to those that like their pictures to move. Arguably the best APS-C SLR on the market today."

Advice about the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD

Hallo everyone,

I'm considering buying this lens. I read some very good reviews. I checked TDP hier, http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=687&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp=833&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=3&APIComp=0 and the sharpness seems to fall off at 200mm. Is this a common problem and does it matter in real life?

Thanks for any advice.

Bigdaddy

7D Mark II incompatible with Tamron SP AF tele-converter

Discovered to day that my new Tamron tele-converter does not work with my new 7D Mark II. It works fine on both my old 7D and on the 6D. I use it with the 70-300mm L F4-5.6 lens. Hope that a future firmware update allows me to use it. It totally locks up the new Mark II and the only way to unlock it is to pull the battery out of the camera.

Custom ICC Printer Profiles

I am curious how many of you use custom IIC printer profiles and how effective they are? Also, what product do you use to profile your printer? Does anyone use a third party to generate the profiles?

I often use x-rite color passport to profile my camera (1Dx) and I use the ColorMunki to profile my display weekly (Dell Ultrasharp 3014). I use the Epson provided ICC profiles for my 3880. I consistently find myself printing a photo 4 or 5 times until I am happy with it... Then I have one image that looks good on my monitor/ the web and a different image for printing.

I would appreciate any advice or direction!

Have a GREAT day!
tom (Win the Day)

More on The Coming 4K Camcorder [CR2]

HTML:
<p>We’ve been told the following and it looks to lineup with something <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/12/4k-fixed-lens-camcorder-coming-cr2/" target="_blank">we posted earlier last week about a fixed lens 4K camcorder coming from Canon</a>.</p>
<p class="p1"><strong>The new 4K camcorder coming</strong></p>
<ul>
<li class="p1"><span class="s1">Direct competition to Sony’s X-70</span></li>
<li class="p1">Sensor size will be about 1″</li>
<li class="p1">Form factor will resemble the Canon EOS C100 on a smaller scale</li>
<li class="p1">Priced around the Sony X-70</li>
<li class="p1">It will definitely be 4K</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Photo Credit: Matt Buchanan // <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5628823/canons-4k-camera-concept-please-be-real-one-day" target="_blank">Gizmodo.com</a></em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,440
Messages
973,673
Members
24,805
Latest member
track inspector

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB