• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

  • Poll Poll
Sigma ART Series: 70-200mm f2.8 possible?

Do you think Sigma will develop an ART Series 70-200mm to compete with Canon's L lens?

  • Yes

    Votes: 11 42.3%
  • No

    Votes: 3 11.5%
  • No idea, but I hope so

    Votes: 6 23.1%
  • I could careless

    Votes: 1 3.8%
  • I don't care, because I wouldn't switch anyways...

    Votes: 5 19.2%

For the sake of discussion, and pure speculation. I have frequently wondered if Sigma will be or is developing a 70-200mm f2.8 to compete with Canon's beloved L. I opted for the Sigma 35mm 1.4 A when it was just released over the Canon 35L and have been very impressed. I will likely buy the 50mm.

So, what do you think?

EOS-1D X, Dual Back Button AF

Having used the back button AF method for several years, I thought I would try the dual back button feature made possible by the recent 2.0.3 firmware update. Until the new firmware update, I separated the AF Start function from the Shutter Button using the normal back button method. My focusing method was to have the AF-ON button set for AI-Servo AF. If I wanted to quickly lock the focus, I would simply focus using AI-Servo AF, release my thumb from the button, reframe the subject and shoot. I could have just switched between the two modes by pressing the AF Drive button on the top deck and use the Main Dial to switch between One-Shot AF and AI Servo AF. However, that just wasen't quick enough for my shoot style.

Prior to the new firmware update, you could program one of the programable buttons to toggle between AI-Servo AF and One-Shot AF. However, that required me to press the button set to toggle between the two AF modes (I used the Multi-function 2 button), with my second finger (middle finger) while using my thumb to press the AF-ON button to focus and my index finger (pointing finger) to release the shutter. That's not good either. Sure, I could have also left the shutter button to the default setting (AF and Metering Start-Shutter Release), but I still like separating those functions.

With the new firmware update, you can now program the AF-ON button to AI-Servo and the AE lock button to One-Shot AF. Once set, they are then dedicated to perform those functions when pressed and held in regardless of what is set on the top LCD panel. Having used this now for a few weeks, I find it the perfect match for my style of shooting.

To program these functions, use page 343 of the updated EOS-1D X Manual (downloadable from the Canon USA website). Simply use Custon Function 5 (Operation, Custom Controls) To make the programming changes to the buttons.

BTW, I programed the MF2 button for Spot AF and the DOF button for AE Lock, as I rarely use the DOF button anyway. I also program the M-Fn button next to the shutter button for the Viewfinder electronic level function.

Using the two back buttons for instant AF selection and activation, together with the Shutter button only used for metering and shutter release, add a great new operational capability to the already wonderful camera. I just wish I could setup my 1D4 to do the same!

I realize this was a rather lengthy explanation, but I know I like it spelled out fully when someone suggests a new method to me! Hope this helps! It is definitely worth trying!

Collecting gear

I am getting more into photography and am purchasing more gear. I have a T3i and a couple lenses that came with it which are nothing special. Plus the cheapest canon 40 mm. I am wondering if I should invest toward a flash, some external flashes and wireless receivers or save up for a nicer lens. Any advice or thoughts would be helpful.

Misbehaving Aperture on 24-105L

Hi All,

Just wanted to check if anybody has experienced the below problem before. I purchased the lens 2nd hand but the seller denies any knowledge of the problem (yeah, right!). I suspect a trip to Canon is in order for this lens but thought I'd run it by everyone here first in case there is some simple solution I've overlooked like shaking it vigorously or perhaps performing a rain dance.

My 24-105 f/4L is having problems with the aperture behaving erratically. When the camera is set to any aperture other than f/4, the iris will constantly change between several different settings. When zooming in, it gets darker (ie the lens doesn't compensate by widening the iris at longer focal lengths as it should to maintain the same aperture ratio. I'm not talking about a flicker, I'm talking about an obvious ~2-stop darkening of the image through the viewfinder) but when zooming out again it stays dark still.

The aperture setting in the camera is not reflective of what the lens iris is actually set to. Eg: the camera might read f/4 while the lens is actually at f/22. Changing the aperture does sometimes cause the iris to adjust, but only within the range of the camera - ie: if the camera reads f/5.6 but the lens is actually at f/22, I can only open up by one stop, because even though the lens is now only at f/16, the camera now thinks it is at it's limit of f/4 and so will not adjust it any further.

And as a precursor to all the usual generic responses, so far I've tried the following: same lens on multiple cameras, different lenses on same cameras, every combination of IS/AF on/off, cleaning the contacts on both the lens and cameras, camera powered by a fully-charged battery, in M mode, live view/movie mode and regular stills, and played around with the DOF preview button. Curiously, the DOF preview does not do anything but when using live-view AF via a half shutter press it does open the iris up to brighten the image, but only temporarlily. And yes, it is definitely the iris and not the shutterspeed/ISO messing up because a) it's in M mode with nothing on auto, and b) because I can see the iris blades flickering erratically through the front of the lens.

Thanks in advance for any help you can give me.... even if that help might be to tell me where my nearest Canon repair centre is!

  • Poll Poll
6D 1.1.4 Firmware upgrade sighted!

The 6d 1.1.4 fw update will feature (choose any you favor)...

  • Make 3rd party batteries incompatible

    Votes: 5 55.6%
  • Disable the Yongnuo st-e3 clone

    Votes: 3 33.3%
  • Fix the slow multi-point af lock

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • Make eval metering more consistent

    Votes: 1 11.1%
  • Add EC in M like on 1dx or Magic Lantern

    Votes: 1 11.1%
  • Add higher Av min. shutter than the ridiculous 1/250s

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • Add raw hdr, or at least save the source files for jpeg

    Votes: 3 33.3%
  • Fix a rare bug (only with the 200-400L near the south pole)

    Votes: 3 33.3%

One 6d owner got his 6d back from service with the new fw, but we don't know what's changed yet (see http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=5530.msg105576#msg105576).

This is your chance to say "I told you so!" after release - vote what the latest hot update from Canon will feature, or write any other items you think will be added in this thread!

Looking for a Pentax 645N

So, since there's no real buy/sell forum, I'm putting a shout out here that I'm looking to buy a Pentax 645N. Preferably with 120 back & lens. Right now things are a bit pricey on ebay (along with the potential risk) and Keh.com doesn't have really much in the way of bodies & B&H has them, but at even a small premium over Ebay I'm still hoping to find something cheaper. Anyone?

Canon MP-E 65 macro lens possibly discontinued, unrepairable

Based on a thread at a popular macro photography forum, the unique Canon MP-E 65 1-5x macro lens is no longer manufactured and is not repairable long-term due to a lack of parts. A letter from Canon-UK is posted at this link, lending credibility to this rumor:

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1362660

However, the various Canon regions do not seem to have the same information. However, Canon USA is apparently telling US customers that all is well and the lens continues in production. At least one of these sources of information is mistaken!

This is very confusing to us hard-core macro enthusiasts since many of us would purchase a spare MP-E 65 lens as a backup if the lens is truly no longer manufactured and is not repairable. I don't personally have the money to buy a $1050 backup lens unless it is really essential.

One longs for the truth about these issues. I wish Canon would issue an official statement worldwide so we'd know the truth with certainty. On the other hand, if they announced the lens being discontinued, I fear that the worldwide stock of new lenses would quickly disappear!

Does anyone know how to get an official statement out of Canon? Can the legendary Chuck Westfall help?

  • Poll Poll
RT-enabled 430EX II replacement

What will be Canon's approach to the second line of Speedlite flashes?

  • Stick with 430EX II and have the single RT-enabled flash, 600EX-RT

    Votes: 7 29.2%
  • Bring out an RT-enabled replacement for the 430EX II

    Votes: 17 70.8%
  • Bring out a non-RT enabled replacement for the 430EX II

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

I have seen speculations and rumors on this forum since a year back regarding replacements to the 430EX II, but nothing has materialized. On the other hand, there are significant rebates on the 600EX-RT, which makes me wonder if Canon wants to abolish this second line of Speedlites altogether? What do you guys think? What are the relative merits of having a cheaper 600EX-RT vs a smaller 430EX replacement.

Top Gear

I was watching Top Gear's Sunday show (UK version, US airing is this coming Monday, I believe) and in one shot, I could very clearly see a typical Canon white lens attached to a pretty fancy rig. I couldn't get a good view of the camera body, but it appeared to be some sort of video camera body and not a typical DSLR body.

Does anyone here know what kind of camera that was? Is that typical of what they're using to film most of their segments with now?

I must say, I am very impressed with the very cinematic look of a couple of their recent stories. I noticed it a week or so ago, and then again in this episode - specifically where Richard is driving the Porsche Hybrid around the racetrac. Some of the shots look very, very nice. They look much nicer than I'm used to seeing on most TV shows. They almost look like film with the dynamic range in them, but I seriously doubt they are shooting film.

EF 85mm f/1.2L II - wobbly wobbly

Hi guys,

I just got my brand-spanking-new 85L II in the mail. It works great, but there's a slight problem with the feel that I don't know how to react to. The focusing ring feels somewhat wobbly - every time I grab it, it shifts sideways, not catastrophically, but noticeably. I googled the issue and saw one review that talks about this wobble, but since there wasn't much else I could find, I'm looking for a second opinion here. Is this something that I should report to the seller and should I have them replace the lens? How many of you 85L users did this happen to?

Thank you very much.

Canon Cinema EOS C100 Dual Pixel Upgrade Explained

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=16012"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=16012">Tweet</a></div>
<p>CPN has posted an article explaining the dual pixel technology upgrade for the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/889545-REG/Canon_EOS_C100_EF_Cinema.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Cinema EOS C100 camera</a>.</p>
<p><strong>How does dual pixel CMOS AF work?

</strong>Dual Pixel CMOS AF is a sensor-based, phase-detection autofocus (AF) technology that’s designed to provide smooth, high-performance continuous focus in movies. It is a unique, Canon-developed technology, ideal for fast and accurate autofocus, helping filmmakers to create stunning footage which maximises the creative options offered by fast lenses and shallow depth-of-field.</p>
<p>The EOS C100 camera with Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology features a CMOS sensor that consists of an array of pixels that each feature two separate photodiodes. By continuously comparing their outputs during AF Mode, phase-difference autofocus helps to ensure non-blurred images and smooth focus transitions even when the subjects and/or camera are moving. The new feature places a high priority on maintaining sharp focus while, providing a natural, smooth autofocus movement with selected Canon EF lenses that offer even smoother and quieter operation.</p>
<p>After this modification, the EOS C100 camera’s Continuous AF function active area represents 20% of the image vertically and 25% horizontally, yielding a very large, centrally located autofocus zone. The AF Lock mode allows you to set focus and hold it, allowing you to change framing while maintaining the original point of focus.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/news/c100_dual_pixel_cmos_af_upgrade.do?utm_source=northlight_images" target="_blank">Read the full article</a> | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/889545-REG/Canon_EOS_C100_EF_Cinema.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Canon Cinema EOS C100 $4999 at B&H Photo</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

AFMA values beyond -20

Hi,
I have bought a used 5D3 last month and recently the Tamron 24-70 f/2,8 VC (also used). I just did AFMA for this lens (as I did with my other lenses before) and even with the value set to -20, it's just not enough. It should be about -22 for Wide and about -26 for Tele (these are educated guesses). What can I do?
Notes:
-I performed a more or less "real life" test at f/4 and it's perfectly ok. Same test at f/2,8 and it seems quite ok.
-I do the following to determine the AFMA values: Tripod, detailed flat object (ie newspaper), camera and object aligned. I defocus manually, and autofocus; then I check the focus using liveview and adjust manually when necessary; I repeat this about 3 times using the middle focus point first and another 3 times for two outer focus points (both left and right). I always defocus first.
-I got very consistent results with my other lenses on this and previous bodies. So I'm confident I do not need FoCal or other packages. It's just this Tamron, which seems too off for calibration but turns out to be ok in real life...
Suggestions?

  • Poll Poll
Canon 600mm f4 IS II Vs Canon 200-400mm w/1.4x TC

Which one would you prefer?

  • Canon 600mm f4 IS II

    Votes: 34 40.0%
  • Canon 200-400mm w/1.4x TC

    Votes: 51 60.0%

Needed Varible ND Suggestions For 7d EFS 17-55mm Lens

Hi, I'm looking for suggestions for a varible ND filter for my 7D EFS 17-55mm lens. Wanting to shoot video on the high end towards the f/2.8 range of this lens. Currently, my sweet spot without a ND is anywhere from f/14 to f/18 bright/cloudy outdoors. I normally shoot at 1920x1080 at 24fps with my shutter speed at 1/50. As you know, the higher the aperture the brighter things get. At f/2.8 I'm totally washed out. I have a B+W UV XS-Pro filter that currently lives on the lens https://www.schneideroptics.com/Ecommerce/CatalogItemDetail.aspx?CID=1554&IID=8160

I see Light Craft Workshop has come out with a Rapid Variable ND lately that looks interesting. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=1015993&Q=&is=REG&A=details

If you have any suggestions that would give me great results, I would sincerely appreciate it. Thanks, Ray

Hotshoe has stopped working?

I have been using my 6D with Excalibur flash unit for months, and suddenly it has stopped working with my camera. I can't figure out what is wrong. The flash is firing if I press the test button on the flash cord, but it's no longer speaking to my camera, so doesn't fire when I press the shutter. I wouldn't be surprised at all if it's something strange I've done with my settings, although I haven't touched them much lately. I feel like i must have done something! The camera otherwise is working fine. Can anyone shed light on this (pun intended)? I am new to using flash at all, so please bear with me!

Fortune Magazine Ranks Canon as One of World's Most Admired Companies for 2014

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/03/fortune-magazine-ranks-canon-as-one-of-worlds-most-admired-companies-for-2014/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/03/fortune-magazine-ranks-canon-as-one-of-worlds-most-admired-companies-for-2014/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><b>MELVILLE, N.Y., March 6, 2014</b> – Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions today announced that its parent company, Canon Inc., has ranked among the top global companies, placing sixth overall and third internationally in the computers category of this year’s Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies list. In the international computers category, Canon ranks as the top Japanese company and the sole representative of the imaging industry. Contributing to their rankings, Canon has received high accolades for innovation, quality of products/services and financial soundness.</p>
<p>The 2014 list was separated into 57 industries from a variety of business areas. With input from executives, directors and analysts, close to 700 companies from 30 countries around the world were analyzed and ranked based on various criteria.</p>
<p>“Fortune’s World’s Most Admired Companies list includes well-regarded leaders in the business world,” said Kotaro Fukushima, senior director and general manager, Corporate Communications, Canon U.S.A. “To be included in this ranking is an honor in itself and further exemplifies our commitment to our customers and the communities we serve.”</p>
<p>Fortune’s World’s Most Admired Companies list can be found at:<a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/most-admired/2014/list/?iid=wma14_sp_full" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/most-admired/</a>.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

In need of a "walk around" camera

My wife and I travel on a regular basis and, of course, photography is an important part of our excursions. At this time I am using a 1D-X, which I absolutely love, but there are times when the weight, appearance and size of this camera make it impractical and/or unsafe to carry. For those reasons I am looking for another camera or body that would be more practical to take when the 1D-X would not be appropriate.

Image quality is a major consideration.

I sure would appreciate some suggestions on what might be an acceptable addition to my travel equipment.

Whitebalance with grey card seems red?

Hello folks,

I recently set my white balance using a new grey card. After that all my pictures seem to have a red tint to them.
I'm using a Canon 600D with Elinchrom flash units and a Mennon grey card.
Before using the grey card i just used a piece of paper for setting white ballance. Seems like i get pretty much identical results with paper and the grey card. - When using the paper I manually added blue in the camera settings to compensate for the red tint. - looks like I have to do the same when using the grey card (somehow makes sense ;) )
When I open the files with the grey card in it and hold my eyedropper on it in photoshop, the color in the card is perfect grey (identical RGB values) - but everything looks reddish???
Just calibrated my screen with no improvement.
Same result on 3 different cameras and different monitors.
Any ideas? Does the background have a red tint or is the balance off?

Attachments

  • Unknown6656.JPG
    Unknown6656.JPG
    1.4 MB · Views: 831

What Happened to the Photography Industry in 2013?

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/03/what-happened-to-the-photography-industry-in-2013/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/03/what-happened-to-the-photography-industry-in-2013/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.lensvid.com" target="_blank">LensVid</a> has posted an excellent infographic showing how truly bad 2013 was for the camera industry. At its worst, there was a 40% drop in total camera sales between 2012 and 2013. That included a 19% drop in DSLR shipments.</p>
<p>A few points are brought up about why the numbers were less than stellar in 2013. The first being the use of smartphones over compact cameras, we’re beating a dead horse with that one. The second reason being the economic stability of the planet, we’re still not totally out of the woods in a lot of places around the globe. The third, and the most interesting is North America’s aversion to the mirrorless market. Until people in the United States show they’re willing to spend on these systems, I don’t think we’ll see a huge advancement in technology or products. It’s a chicken and the egg thing, people keep saying make something worth buying, but every company is watching their R&D dollar and DSLR’s and lenses are still a safer bet for a return.</p>
<div id="attachment_16001" style="width: 585px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Infographic-1920-1200-01.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-16001" alt="Click for Larger" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Infographic-1920-1200-01-575x359.jpg" width="575" height="359" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click for Larger</p></div>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://lensvid.com/gear/lensvid-exclusive-what-happened-to-the-photography-industry-in-2013/" target="_blank">LV</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Review: Tamron 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15998"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15998">Tweet</a></div>
<p>Bryan over at The-Digital-Picture has completed his review of the Tamron 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD supertelephoto zoom lens. I do not recall another lens by Tamron receiving so many reviews and so quickly. Like the previous reviews, this one gives the Tamron a very good score, but also outlines a few of its weaknesses.</p>
<p>As we’ve mentioned before, the price will make this lens extremely attractive to a lot of photographers out there.</p>
<p><strong>Says Bryan

</strong><em>“This highly anticipated lens has been a very fun lens to evaluate. While autofocus performance and over-500mm image quality get my vote for this lens’ weaknesses, the Tamron 150-600 still has a great deal going for it. The Tamron 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Lens is defined by attractive image quality over a great focal length range with a relatively compact, light, reasonably well-built design that includes Vibration Control and a very attractive price.”<strong>

</strong></em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1013956-REG/tamron_a011_c_sp_150_600mm_f_5_6_3_di.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Tamron 150-600 f/5.6.3 VC $1069</a> | <a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-150-600mm-f-5-6.3-Di-VC-USD-Lens.aspx" target="_blank">Read the full review</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

General purpose zoom for family vacation of 12

I am only posting this because i am bringing my 5d3 and coild bring my 24-70 2.8 ii but have been considering the 24-70 f4l is since i can get one for about $860 and also considering the canon 24-105. For me the thought process was if i can shoot at a lower shutter speed on some of the indoor shots because of the iS then
I could use less flash output for faster recycle times and a lower iso. Also it would be smaller and lighter since some of the trip is a cruise. But when testing it seems that my 24-70 is drastically sharper. Amy i crazy? Has anyone here done a comparision with this? Basucally just trying to see if this lens will help or if I should stay with the 2.8. Ohh the trip is a disney cruise followed by 7 days in the parks.

Headed on safari, need some advice

Heading on safari in October.

I currently have a 60d a 100-400, 15-85, 28-135 and nifty fifty. I will be purchasing a canon 70-200f2.8 mkii in the next two weeks after borrowing a friend's mki.

On to my question, every site recommends 2 or 3 bodies so I'm deciding what to do. I'd like to keep it in the $2500 or less range. Below are my thoughts

1) wait for the 7dmkii (thinking about $2000) use the 70-200mkii on that and the 100-400 on the 60d, sony rx100 if something comes right next to the jeep

2) Refurbed 5dmkiii (slightly over $2550 through the canon loyalty program) use the 70-200mkii on that and the 100-400 on the 60d, see above notes about rx100

3) 6d through canon loyalty or used for ~$1400 with the 70-200, 70d (1000-1100 depending on sale) with the 100-400, and the 60d with my 15-85

Appreciate feedback (I know the 15-85 is efs)

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB