Waiting for the 35 1.4L II

Hi!
I'm looking for 35 1.4L, i will going to a interesting photographic travel on this summer, and the 35 will be perfect for lenght, weight and people street photography.. (on 5D2)

Here's the problem: buy now the 35L 1.4, or waiting for the 35L1.4 II? ?
I think that 35II will be announced maybe this year but sell in 2015-16.

Alternatives are my 50 1.4, 40 2.8 or 28 2.8.

What do you think? :o




sorry for my english

Using 6D with on camera flash and pocket wizard

Hiya Folks,

My main camera is a 5D3 with a 6D as my second.

For weddings and event work, I use a 600RT on my 5D with a pocket wizard plugged in to the pc outlet to fire a room light ( Paul Buff Einstein ). This works perfectly for me.

Since I don't usually use both camera's at once in this fashion, it was only recently I realized the 6D does NOT have a PC outlet. I understand the simpler focusing system from the 5D but really, no pc plug?

So...what I'm looking for is a way to fire my 600RT and fire off a room light, and NOT USE a Pocket Wizard FlexTT5.
I have one, don't really like it, only use it outside for the higher sync with the studio light.
I'm guess I'm looking for something that fits between the flash and the camera and gives me TTL and a pc outlet.

Any suggestions?

Thanks...Arnie

A Circular Video with the 8-15mm Fisheye - Underwater

Hello Everyone,

I experimented doing some video with the Canon 8-15mm Fisheye lens. It is definitely a specialized look.
Have a look. I found that movement and spinning served it well, but obvisouly this needs to be done in the right circumstance. Let me know what you think.

Coral Reef - Circular Experiment, Canon 5d Mark II


Does anyone know if it is possible to make it record a full circle, instead of cutting off the top and bottom?

Thanks,

Dustin

What is Bokeh - Article

A attempt to define Bokeh.

http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/gadgets-electronics/blogs/what-is-bokeh-blurry-photography-effect-explained?hpt=hp_bn18

There are several examples, I find some of them to be ugly, others to be striking. I think each of us might like different ones, there is no right or wrong, just personal preference.

For example, I do not like the bokeh circles with the dot in the center, or the ones of the ocean waves catching light. The one with the sea birds on the rock are so ugly that they detract from the subject.

Comparing write performance on Transcend 400x / Lexar 800x CF cards

Hi everyone,
First post for me - finally out from the shadows! This forum has been priceless to me for the past 3 years. :)

I am posting this to ask whether I am missing something obvious, and if not I hope it will help others.

I recently bought a couple more CF cards for a wedding - yet another Transcend 32GB 400x and for my first time a Lexar Professional 32GB 800x. I have always (since 2004) bought Transcend but thought I would treat myself to a Lexar at double the price as I assumed it would have superior write speeds, not that I typically shoot long bursts of RAW, just short bursts. So I got it thinking it would just be my better, default card for future shoots.

On my 5D3 I was surprised that the Transcend was actually faster, yet cost less than half the Lexar. in 5 seconds I could write about 17 shots with the 400x Transcend but only about 14 with the Lexar 800x. The test was writing Large RAW to the CF, and no SD card present.

Since I have personally had no issue with reliability nor support for the Transcend nor the download speed to my computer, I wish I had known, because then I would not have bought Lexar at double the cost. Maybe there is clear information somewhere from Canon, but I must have missed it.
Thanks.

What about those lens weights?

Are you doing curls with your lenses lately? Is your photo pack dragging you down hills? Or is all the fuss about the weight of today's lenses just for wusses? After a discussion of gear weight elsewhere, I saw Bryan's review of the Sigma Art where he cleverly provided the build data for many 50mm lenses, along with dates of manufacture. Dropping them into a scatter plot yielded the attached chart.

At least this confirms what we would suspect. None of the lenses in his review built prior to the year 2000 weigh more than 400 grams, while 6/10 of those after do. There are a few notable lenses missing, and this only covers 50mm, but the data here was handy so I nabbed it.

So what do folks think? Is smaller and lighter better for you? Or do you prefer higher quality and damn the pounds? Have you swapped down to a mirrorless ILC, or would you own and use both ILCs and SLRs?

Attachments

  • 50mmLensWeightByYear.png
    50mmLensWeightByYear.png
    40.8 KB · Views: 1,925

Thinking about moving from a 1Dx back to 5D MkIII

I'm again thinking about selling off my 1Dx and picking up a 5D Mk III again. It will be my third 5D III in two years or so.

Negatives about the 1Dx as compared to the 5D III:

1. only 18 MP; I need to crop most of the time even when using my 600mm + 1.4x. I photograph mostly birds with this combo.

2. Loud shutter. I get all kind of looks from parents when I photograph events ( indoor ice skating, tae kwon do, birthday parties).

3. Heavy; especially with pro f/2.8 zooms.

4. Most of the time, with 12 or 10 FPS I feel overwhelmed with the number of exposures I take back with me and post process.

Positives for the 1Dx:

1. 12fps when really needed; like shooting BIF.

2. Spot metering on any AF point (not just the center point).

3. A bit faster AF speed on most lenses.

4. better metering and AWB.

5. the new auto exposure compensation when in Manual mode. Not really used it, but would have loved it when I photographed eagles last Nov.

6. Ergonomic portrait shutting (built in grip)...I never liked the bolt on grips of the smaller EOS bodies. They just seem out of place and not really ergonomic.

I could use some funds to feed another expensive hobby of mine...so the spare $3k might go a long way. Or I can sell off some other lenses like the 70-200mm f/4L and 17-40mm f/4L. These are kinda overlaps since I have the f/2.8L's.

Anyone think that Canon will trickle down the auto exposure compensation in manual mode to the 5D III? The last firmware update for it was over 6 months ago.

Thanks for insight and constructive brain storming. BTW, this is a hobby and I don't earn a living from photography. I am called upon occasionally to do family portraits and shot important event ( got a polo event to shoot in June ).

-- Jason

upgrade from t2i to 1dm4 or 1dx??

Ok so I have been all over the world via interweb.... hah..
my first post here...

so lets start here.. you can see my current gear list on POTN...
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=10733015&postcount=2458

my flickr - most anything beer bottle held and rc car based is galaxy note 3 based except for rc car white box background...

anyway...
quick note on me.. I am a hobbyist due to kids. It all started 5 years ago when my oldest got into night hockey. Our P&S took pics that made the kids look like zombies... white eyes and all fuzzy...

anyway I purchased a t2i and took off.. while I have been having fun... funds have made it difficult to upgrade. We did deck hockey and travel soccer.... for general use the 55-250 for soccer and 85mm f1.8 does ok for night street hockey....

I soon lusted for an upgrade and the 70d was it. I expected a bonus of $7k+ ($4400 after taxes) so when it came in recently I told the wife I was going to use 1/2 to buy a 70d and 70-200 2.8 mark i. long story short and none the less.. my bonus paid for a trip to NC outer banks which we do every year.

so I was told by my love of 23 years (married 20 this year)...
that if I want a new camera sell my truck...
truck specs: worked motor/6" lift tubbed 40" ground hawgs/1 tons/ detroit lockers front and back.. the list goes on..

anyway had someone checkout the truck and he is trying to get the $$$$$$$$$$ together...

so I will have $7k in my hands.. when I do I need to spend it all before it gets used for bills...
I have a winch which will be sold separate for $1200 or the kid can give me $8k for truck and winch.. anyway... im babbling...

IF HE DOES NOT BACK OUT IN 3 DAYS!!!!!!

so guy I work with is a 2nd shooter of weddings for a studio and does many jobs. He shoots a 5dm3 and has many lenses. We talk and he said the 1D Mark IV is what I need.

aka Need - Outdoor Night Street Hockey (ball on foot on asphalt) / Travel Soccer U8 and U14 / Indoor MMA (Mixed Martial Arts)

so now that you see my needs...
I LUST the 1dx however he (guy at work) says there is no reason to buy a 1dx or d4s unless you are a supremely booked photographer and as a hobbyist it will fall into idiocy.

so my delema... I could keep my t2i and buy glass... I want a body to use in the rain as some games happen that way. Night Hockey is usually in fall from Nov to end of Jan so Snow/Slush/Rainy Slush....

2 other guys at work are bad word users (NIKON) and I tried getting them on my side...

am I really stretching it? I would have the $$$$ if the kid buys the truck.... to get a 1dx... is it really needed?
or should I just sit back with the 1D Mark IV?

I am looking for people that had the 1dm4 went to 1dx and love it or went back....

I have seen every possible thread on the web... specs on paper are not real world...

side note I do want to go to a side paid event where I have a hookup with the local hockey league to do action shots and setup a studio.


so here is the biggest part..
if kid buys truck I have 2 choices... u tell me what would U do ... not what is ethical but what you would do even if it is stupid....

I always overdue.. my push mower has basically a ride mower.. I bought a new 2013 gmc sierra last year.. oh it came with 35's / 6" lift and really expensive.. and I drive it 125 miles a day filling up every other day... so yeah I overdo most ...

understand I know about mega zooms and iq loss but on these bodies I can live with it....
so choices...
Canon 1D Mark IV / Tammy 70-200 2.8 vc / Sigma 50-500(moon shots and long reach soccer) / sigma 18-35 f1.8
$1000 left over - buy memory cards / batteries and whatever...
or
1dx / Tammy 70-200 2.8 vc / Sigma 50-500


now I know about the mega zoom in 50-500.. i played with one on the 70d in the store and really liked it.. so it will be in my bag even if guy doesnt buy the truck and I dont get anything.. the sigma will be used even on my t2i....


so checkout my flickr... im a sub par hobbyist... I am in IT and if I post something it is up for grabs on bashing... I wont be upset...


https://www.flickr.com/photos/56197228@N05/

Advice on drop-in filter (PL-C 52)

Hi,

I am about to buy a polarizer filter for my Canon EF 300m f/2.8L IS prime lens (old version, not the new version II). I noticed there seem to be two versions out there of the PL-C 52. Some have the addition WII. They are cheaper and more easily available. I guess it is an updated version of this filter?

My question now is, will the WII version be compatible with my older (non II) telephoto lens? Of course I would prefer to buy the WII, but maybe I have to lookout and try to get one of the older versions? :-\

Thanks and best regards,
Steb

Butterfly Portrait

Portrait of a Painted Lady Butterfly

I love the detail of the fur on this butterfly. Macro photography really allows you to see some amazing things. I grabbed the camera quick as my daughter held this butterfly on her finger.

Shot with a T1i with EF-S 60mm macro, 430EX flash, and Rogue flash bender soft box kit.

Attachments

  • Painted Lady Portrait (1 of 1).jpg
    Painted Lady Portrait (1 of 1).jpg
    667.3 KB · Views: 416

Sell a spare 5d3 for 1dx?

I am considering getting the 1dx for manual exp comp, better tracking, cleaner iso images 3200-6400, more customizable features with the second mn function button.

I shoot portraits, indoor sports, nature and gettigpng into wildlife. I can sell my second body and get the 1dx, sigma 50mm art, 1.4 extender iii.

Or

Get 16-35 2.8 ( for landscapes, large groups)
More backdrops, lighting, etc
300mm f4 is
1.4 ext iii
St-e3
Canon 8-15 f4
Grip

I have a $6k budget and on the fence on the 1dx or more completing my lens lineup.
Just looking for options. Is the 1dx worth the reasons I mentioned?

G16 or ?

I handled a few of the leaders today for a few seconds each and found the G16 to be the most readily intuitive. That might point to seeing what the G17 entails, but do some of you like the G16 over any of the others (like the RX100, X20, etc.)?
I'm on the search for the "ultimate" compact for travel/street.
Thanks.

My fast DIY Filter holder for Rokinon FE 14M-C, 14 mm, F/ 2.8

Dear Friend.
This time my DIY is too big and too expansive to make , Except , I already have all spare part.
Plus I and shoot only Square Photos, Not total wide angle Picture---Sorry, I fail this time, But I try.
Here are the spare parts :
A)Genus 77 mm Varies ND Filter.
B)Cokin " P " series
C) Genus Rubber Filter Hood.
D)Cokin " P " Series Filter Holder.
E) Cokin " P Series Filter Hood.
And Put to gather with Velcro, for easy to remove as individual part.
Enjoy
Surapon, Your friend.

Attachments

  • DIY-1.jpg
    DIY-1.jpg
    173.1 KB · Views: 294
  • DIY-2.jpg
    DIY-2.jpg
    144.6 KB · Views: 301
  • DIY-3.jpg
    DIY-3.jpg
    131.7 KB · Views: 368
  • DIY-4.jpg
    DIY-4.jpg
    149.7 KB · Views: 376
  • DIY-5.jpg
    DIY-5.jpg
    154.3 KB · Views: 316

Panning clamp question

Hi all, I have just received a Sunwayfoto panning clamp to use on my Arca Swiss Z1 ballhead, but the included M6 screw (as well as the screw for the ballhead) is too short. There is a gap after which the threads start inside the ballhead stem, and the screw threads don't reach deep enough.
If you are using panning clamps from RRS or some other company, can you tell me how long the screws are approximately? Does anyone actually use a panning clamp with the Z1. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

so finally

Yesterday I went to our local shop to get some advice regarding my 60D and some minor scratches (barely visible) in viewfinder. I was bit concerned since I plan to sell it soon and these marks are lowering the resale value. The technician said it's not a reason to replace viewfinder and noted if I haven't informed him, he would not know about it. So I was quite happy with result.

But, why I am telling you this story? This whole trip ended up the "worst" way it could (in my situation) and now I am owner of shiny new 70-200L II, smiling satisfied and my wallet is being 2K lighter (ok, I'll get 250 back due to canon cashback).

It's my first white and today I completed my dream set of 5D mk III + 24-70 mk II + 70-200 mk II + 100L
Thank you all guys for all advices, useful links and opinions.

New Canon Tilt-Shift Lenses at Photokina [CR1]

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/05/new-canon-tilt-shift-lenses-at-photokina-cr1/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/05/new-canon-tilt-shift-lenses-at-photokina-cr1/">Tweet</a></div>
<p>Another mention of new Canon tilt-shift lenses. Replacements for the TS-E 45 f/2.8 and TS-E 90 f/2.8 are expected. We’ve heard there’s a possibility of 3 new tilt-shift lenses, but we do not know what the third one could be. Apparently the new lenses will be shown at Photokina 2014 in September.</p>
<p>We’ve had a couple of people speculate that a macro tilt-shift lens could be a possibility for Canon. We have heard of a new and interesting macro lens was in development, but we’ve never received any details of what would make it “interesting”.</p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/Canon_new_lenses.html" target="_blank">NL</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Cuteness Overload

Went to an arboretum, and came back with an unexpected haul (set here https://www.flickr.com/photos/62198876@N02/sets/72157644147693898/)

1 https://flic.kr/p/nwkcE8']
14126733351_fa5091eba8_b.jpg
FQ2A8899[/URL] by https://www.flickr.com/people/62198876@N02/']dancook1982[/URL], on Flickr

2 https://flic.kr/p/nyp56c']
14150121333_f66aab2540_b.jpg
FQ2A8856[/URL] by https://www.flickr.com/people/62198876@N02/']dancook1982[/URL], on Flickr

3 https://flic.kr/p/nf8tCP']
13943381819_edd563c9a8_b.jpg
FQ2A8839[/URL] by https://www.flickr.com/people/62198876@N02/']dancook1982[/URL], on Flickr

4 https://flic.kr/p/nwCdXZ']
14130054655_5835e7bde4_b.jpg
FQ2A8766[/URL] by https://www.flickr.com/people/62198876@N02/']dancook1982[/URL], on Flickr

5 https://flic.kr/p/nwCdP2']
14130054135_700d15f054_b.jpg
FQ2A8759[/URL] by https://www.flickr.com/people/62198876@N02/']dancook1982[/URL], on Flickr

6 https://flic.kr/p/nf8uNn']
13943385737_6262584082_b.jpg
FQ2A8945[/URL] by https://www.flickr.com/people/62198876@N02/']dancook1982[/URL], on Flickr

EF-S 10-18 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM & EF 16-35 f/4L IS Around the Corner? [CR2]

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/05/ef-s-10-18-f4-5-5-6-is-stm-ef-16-35-f4l-is-around-the-corner-cr2/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/05/ef-s-10-18-f4-5-5-6-is-stm-ef-16-35-f4l-is-around-the-corner-cr2/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><a href="http://digicame-info.com/2014/05/ef-s10-18mm-f45-56-is-usmef16-.html" target="_blank">More reports</a> [DCI] have popped up today about two new wide angle zoom lenses from Canon. We <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/05/more-wide-angle-lens-speculation-cr1/" target="_blank">reported about this yesterday</a> and there has now been some clarification of what the lenses will be.</p>
<p>The first will be an EF-S 10-18 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM. The EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 would probably stay current even after the new EF-S 10-18 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM is announced. I imagine the new EF-S lens is smaller, lighter and cheaper. The rumor from yesterday seems to have missed the mark on this lens being a constant aperture of f/4. Though more clarification may be forthcoming.</p>
<p>The second will be an EF 16-35 f/4L IS, which will be the exciting one for a lot of people. For the record, a <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/03/patent-ef-16-35-f4l-17-40-f4l-and-others/" target="_blank">patent for the EF 16-35 f/4L IS appeared in March of this year</a>.</p>
<p>There has been no more information on a new EF 100-400.</p>
<p>More to come….</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,564
Members
24,804
Latest member
zukibird

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB