Threads

Jun 25, 2013

there is a german review about the EF 24-70mm that came to a pretty bad conclusion.
contrary to most reviews on the net.

now they say it was because the resolution drops significantly below 3m focusing distance (when not in macro mode).
they did a re-test and the figures look much better now.
they use imatest.

Das Canon löst mit durchschnittlich 2.318 Linien extrem hoch auf und stürmt fast unsere Rangliste. Mit unserem Standard-Testchart konnten wir jedoch zunächst im Schnitt nur sehr magere 1.663 Linien ermitteln. Das kam uns merkwürdig vor und spiegelte zudem nicht den internationalen Testkonsens wider. Zufällig stiessen wir beim Autofokustest auf das Phänomen, dass erst aus grösserer Distanz (in der Endbrennweite ca. 3m) die hohe Auflösungsleistung realisiert werden kann. Dafür ist unser Standard-Chart nicht ausgelegt, insoweit haben wir improvisiert. Nichtsdestotrotz sollte man sich bewusst sein, dass - ohne den Makromodus zu nutzen - sich aus geringeren Distanzen unbefriedigende Ergebnisse einstellen können. Wir haben dennoch die höhere Entfernung ausgewiesen, weil sie idR wohl in der Praxis eine höhere Relevanz haben dürfte.

does someone noticed this on his EF 24-70mm f4 that the resolution drops below 3m focusing distance?

tomsop · Jun 25, 2013

Hi - I am intrigued by the anticipated firmware update to the EOS-M that may make the AF usable. I see some people are suggesting that the current AF of the 100D is slightly better than the EOS-M. Will the firmware improve the EOS-M over the 100D? I am a little bit not very well informed about the technology but will the faster AF from the firmware update also improve video AF as well for the EOS-M?

As a side note, I was intrigued by the possibility of getting a EOS-M by price matching through Best Buy for the Frys EOS-M w/22MM STM lens for $349.90 but they interpreted the Fry's offering as a clearance sale so best they could do is knock 10% off their own price of $479. I may go to Frys only if I have an opportunity to get there by 6/27 when the sale ends. However, I am slightly nervous buying one until the firmware is firmly offered. What if the final result is less than par - I hope they don't jack up the price again. I suppose I should wait. The main thing for me is if the firmware increases the video AF then I will get the EOS-M. SHould I wait or take a look at the 100D?

RGF · Jun 24, 2013

Hard choice. In the end I would go with lower MP (assuming that they are clean) and better S/N and gain FPS.

Don Haines · Jun 24, 2013

The ULTIMATE! Canon lens. Called the Hyper Suprime-Cam, it’s a 870-megapixel ultra-wide-field camera that stands 3 meters (~10 feet) high and weighs in at 3 tons. The 870-megapixel images are captured by 116 individual CCD sensors placed together on a focal plane in a chamber that’s kept at -100° C.

On the front of the camera is an extremely large lens that was manufactured by Canon. It contains seven optical elements, with some of the lenses up to a meter in diameter.

You can read about it at:
http://petapixel.com/2013/06/24/this-870-megapixel-monster-camera-has-116-sensors-and-weighs-3-tons/

Jay Khaos · Jun 24, 2013

A topic with this same name already exists and I skimmed through it's 5 pages without really gaining any piece of mind about my concerns so I figured I'd start a fresh one. I'll summarize what I've learned so far (let me know if anything is incorrect):

24-70mm f4 IS
Best price as of 6/24/13: $1,299 (24-105: ~$750)
Pros:
- improved barrel distortion over 24-105
- lighter and smaller than 24-105
- improved corner sharpness
- overall better sharpness at 24mm

Cons:
- shitty/lose-fitting lens hood (According to learningcameras.com review. Anyone else experience this?)
- less sharp in general (also according to learning cameras.com. I've read mixed reviews on this...)
- high price compared to 24-105
- loses range compared to 24-105

For me, whichever lens I choose would be primarily used for video. When it IS used for stills, it would mainly be used for product/stock shots. A lot of times I try to fill the frame with the intention of removing the background—so this is where the 24-70's corner sharpness becomes a somewhat significant benefit to me.

I understand that the 24-105 is "good enough" and some even argue that it is overall better, especially for it's price. However, for my use, the weight-savings, corner sharpness and IS may prove to be worth the money if they are actually really improvements. I'm really interested if someone has real experience with both of these lenses (especially for video use), and can comment objectively comparing those things

Thanks!
Jay

omar · Jun 24, 2013

I need a stabiliser for my 60D

On eBay and Amazon I can get one for £70 say (at the cheaper end)
No idea how good these are

Or... should I make one myself...?
YouTube has zillions of videos showing people making their own

Thanks

Omar

bendobb · Jun 24, 2013

Well, after years of procrastination I'm ready to spend some cash on some new gear.
I'm an amateur who mostly shoots family, holiday and landscapes and want to try macro photography too.

I've pretty much decided on a canon 6d; kit 24-105; 100L macro; 600 ex-rt.

But I've a few hundred left over and want something small, light weight and relatively fast.

So 50 f1.4 or 40 f2.8. I think I would like the wider angle and tiny pancake, but is the 50 a sharper lens? Will I miss the extra stops?

Thanks for any help.

Ben

zim · Jun 24, 2013

Hi,

I have a Pixel wireless Remote Control RW-221RX on a 500D

The Pixel is cheep cheerful and does what I want for stills.

Recently I had a need to do remote video, wasn't able to use the above.

The manual says an RC1/RC5 should allow remote activation on a 500D. I have the RC5, again I can't get that to work.

I have Remote control Enabled on the video menu and self-timer/remote control (does that have any affect when in video mode?)

Are there any other settings I need to set?

I'm sure an RC1 would work but I need something that works 10 - 15m behind the camera (like the Pixel does for stills)

Would anyone have any recommendations?

PS If it’s not already obvious I’m a complete novice at EOS video, just stumbled into a very specific need for short remote video sequences.

Thanks in advance

Jay Khaos · Jun 24, 2013

I've been considering Canon's new 35 since it was released, although the negative response to it and price has led me to hold off on it. Understandably, it has been thrown into the new Sigma 35's shadow for still photography. According to a review by Safari (forget last name) on Youtube, the IS "doesn't work" for video and looks like you're not using an IS lens at all. Also, he says that glaring is an issue as well. His review is the only one I'm aware of that mentions these two negatives...

Despite the negative general consensus that this lens seems to have developed because of it's high price, it still seems like it might be good for me. It seems there really isn't anything else comparable at least for video use (video will be it's main use). Am I missing something? I don't feel like I am... but if I am, someone here always knows...

Here is a list I've put together of pros vs cons based on all of the reviews/videos I've watched:

PROS
- sharper than the canon 35 1.4
- CA is improved over the 35 1.4
- 4-stop IS
- f2
- rounded aperture blades

CONS
- high price
- plastic construction
- questionable IS (maybe?)
- slowish AF
- glare

Does anyone have experience with this lens personally? Especially interested in comments about it's use for video. Any experience with IS in video and... is it true that it's IS isn't as good as other IS lenses?? Should anything in my pros/cons list be modified?

Canon Rumors · Jun 24, 2013

HTML:

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=13764"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=13764">Tweet</a></div>
<p><strong>A new 35L

</strong>We haven’t heard anything in regards to a replacement for the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/162614-USA/Canon_2512A002_Wide_Angle_EF_35mm.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L</a> lens in a long time, however this weekend it was mentioned that the EF 35 f/1.4L II is in fact in testing. There is no imminent announcement date,  and it may be held until a new full frame camera is ready to go in 2014.</p>
<p>We’ve talked about this lens a lot in the past and it has been rumoured to be replaced since the EF 24 f/1.4L II was announced. We also know that <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/07/patent-canon-ef-35-f1-4l/" target="_blank">patents do exist for the optical formula</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/898831-REG/Sigma_340_101_35mm_f_1_4_DG_HSM.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Sigma’s 35mm f/1.4 DG</a> seems to be taking a lot of sales from the current Canon equivalent, here’s hoping that forces Canon’s hand on getting a replacement ready.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Canon Rumors · Jun 24, 2013

HTML:

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=13758"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=13758">Tweet</a></div>
<p><strong>From The Digital Picture

</strong>Bryan has completed his full review of the Canon EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x (we’re still working on ours). As expected, the review is a glowing one as this lens performs unbelievably well for a zoom.</p>
<p>Says Bryan:

<em>“If the f/4 max aperture is not an issue for you, the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4 L IS USM Ext 1.4x Lens, by virtue of its focal length range, can replace several other lenses in your kit. It will deliver stunning image quality and should stand up to professional use. I’m still integrating this lens into my kit, but … I have been using it for almost everything I shoot since it arrived. I expected awesomeness and the 200-400 L delivered it.”</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-200-400mm-f-4-L-IS-USM-Extender-1.4x-Lens-Review.aspx" target="_blank">Read the full review</a> </strong></p>
<p><strong><strong>Canon EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x $11,799 USD</strong>

</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong><strong>USA: </strong><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/973129-REG/canon_5176b002_ef_200_400mm_f_4l_is.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/CA2004004.html?KBID=64393" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CQGF8H6/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00CQGF8H6&linkCode=as2&tag=canorumo-20" target="_blank">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://www.normancamera.com/index/page/product/product_id/28468/product_name/Canon+EF+200-400mm+f4L+IS+USM+Lens+with+Internal+1.4x+Extender" target="_blank">Norman Camera</a></strong></li>
<li><strong><strong>Canada: </strong><a href="http://www.cameracanada.com/enet-cart/product.asp?pid=5176B002" target="_blank">Camera Canada</a></strong></li>
<li><strong><strong>Europe: </strong><a href="http://www.photocineshop.com/fr/vente/products/Canon-EF-200-400-mm-f-4L-IS-USM-Multiplicateur-1-4X-integre-WB0RS5?search=200-400&page=1" target="_blank">PhotoCineShop</a></strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Barrfly · Jun 24, 2013

I purchased a 5D mkIII back in April as an upgrade to my 7D, I've been very happy with the new camera until the other evening when I was shooting in some low light situations with the flash.
For reasons that seem to be eluding me I can't find the setting in camera to activate the focus assist beam from the flash. It fires with the proper exposures though I have to switch to live view for my auto focus to lock on.
When the same flash is on the 7D this is not an issue, the auto focus assist beam kicks in as needed .

Has anyone else had this problem with a 5Dmk III ?

Hillsilly · Jun 24, 2013

My old tripod bag is getting a bit old and worn. Plus, it has never been that comfortable to carry around. So, I'm curious how other people carry tripods to see if there is a better way.

If you are travelling light on a short walk - say only an hour or two - what do you do? Do you use a tripod bag? Do you keep your camera attached to the tripod and dangle it over your shoulder for instant access? Do you attach a strap directly to your tripod? Any other ways?

I see Lowepro have some bags (the Flipside Sport 10L and 15L) which look fairly small but still seem to have a good tripod attachment points. Has anyone used these? Are there any other good small bag options?

Jun 24, 2013

I have a EF 100mm f2.0 i use for portraits.

Now i will buy the 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro lens.

I ask myself it it makes sense to keep the 100mm f2.0?
Will i use it when i have the L?

Does f2.0 vs. f2.8 makes such a big difference that i like to keep the f2.0?
I use the EF 100mm f2.0 at f2.0 or f2.2 most of the time. I bought it for shallow DOF.

Or will the Macro be so good that i don´t use the EF 100mm f2.0 anymore?

Anyone who was in the same situation?
What do you think?

adhocphotographer · Jun 24, 2013

Hi all,

I had recently been considering getting the TS-E 24 II as a landscape/architecture lens, however, after great advice from you guys (http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=15485.0) I have re-evaluated my needs.

I shoot at 24mm a lot, for landscape, buildings and street (in that order of preference too).
I'm looking for an increase in IQ and speed over my 24-105
IS is not needed particularly, but would not be snubbed at, AF is required though
Size and weight are a consideration but not a major one... I carry my camera with me always so lighter is always nicer.

My current thoughts are:
24mm f/1.4L II
24mm f/2.8 IS
24-70mm f/2.8L II

I'm leaning more towards a prime as i am quite happy with my 24-105 as a "one lens does all travel lens". I do not have any urgent need to go wider at the moment and am happily waiting for a 14-24.

Any more great words of advice/wisdom?

Thanks,

John

tpatana · Jun 24, 2013

One day I got thinking, I was quite busy elsewhere so when I got back home I had to pretty much just grab my bag and go, hoping all I needed was in the bag. Most of time my gear is <5 minute ready, meaning I have both camera and flash batteries either close to full, or charged after last event, and lenses/bodies are typically within 6 feet from my bag, and most in the bag anyway. So when I need my gear, just get my bag and check the adjacent floor and shelves for missing items, pick them up and I'm ready.

So say your friend gave you a call and tells there's awesome event you must come to shoot right now, gives the address but doesn't tell exactly what the event is, how long it would take you to leave your house with at least your main body plus most/all your lenses so regardless of the event you're set for the shooting. Flash(es) I would count in, but not strobes or anything that magnitude.

Choose either appropriate wording or the estimated time it would typically take you to get driving.

beckstoy · Jun 23, 2013

Alright everybody, here's the hard question. Someone's gonna ask it!

You can only pick 1 lens for the rest of your life from today's current lineup. What do you do?

Take some time and think about your answer for

1. A Crop Sensor camera

2. A Full-Frame camera

Also, let us know what you normally shoot (weddings, landscapes, macro, etc.)

I'll start it off:

(I shoot Weddings and Events, primarily)

1. EF-S 17-55mm f2.8

2. EF 70-200mm f2.8 II (amazing lens)

purry · Jun 23, 2013

I have a 60D should I go with the 50MM 1.8 or the 40MM pancake? I am doing both video and stills.

vkiran · Jun 23, 2013

Was shopping for a monopod to hold up my 600mm on safaris (in India and Kenya). Is Really right stuff MH02-Pro Pkg: MC-34 Monopod + MH-02 the right stuff?

dickgrafixstop · Jun 23, 2013

Anyone use one seriously? I've got a bag of FD lenses that have been unused since my beloved A1 died, and I'd
like to continue using them if possible. I know about the infinity focus limitation and that the glass correction
piece will cost me a stop, but with prices varying from >$20 to <$200 on ebay, anyone have any recommendations?

pato · Jun 23, 2013

Hi All
I might have an offer to buy a used Canon 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM for around 750 USD. I don't yet have any usefull lens in that range, only the Sigma 400mm F5.6 APO Marco HSM which is not rechipped (and thus only with open aperture).
The lens has a little dust inside and the hood mounting mechanism is broken, but the seller says it's optically in otherwise perfect condition.

What do you think? Shall I rather way for the successor of this lens or get it? I'm not really in a hurry to buy it, but I think it's a really nice offer.

rlarsen · Jun 23, 2013

Thanks to BuyDig.com and Canon Rumors for the 5% discount on select Canon bodies and lenses.
I decided I wasn't going to purchased the over-priced 24-70 2.8 ll until I found a deal from a reliable seller.
Canon Rumors and BuyDig worked together to offer special pricing. The 5% turned into a $100 savings on a lens that's hard to find on sale. BuyDig.com also offered a Hoya uv filter, a modest lens cleaning kit, and rush shipping.

I had purchased from BuyDig.com many years ago but was reminded what a class act they are. The service could not have been better. They offered free, 2-day shipping, but sent my US warranty lens next day air.
The included 82mm Hoya filter was excellent quality and saved me nearly $70. My local camera repair man put a scope on it and told me it is as sharp as I could get at any price.

BuyDig.com is a quality online dealer, I hope Canon Rumors will continue to team up with them to offer discounted pricing.

The mid-range zoom is my most used lens for professional work. When Canon introduced the 28-70 2.8 L many years I immediately added to my kit, and then up-graded to the 24-70.

After a lot of thought I'm glad I got the 24-70 2.8 ll. It's sharper, has better contrast, focuses fast, and
is most impressive when shooting back-lit subjects.

The popular new lens is not perfect in my opinion. Though it costs an extra $1000, the focal length is not the same. It's wider, and I'm not happy to give up focal length at the long end. If version 1 is 70mm, the new one falls short of that. I wrote about it in a previous post and some photographers didn't like it. Some said it wasn't true, others said they don't care, and a couple people wrote about "focus breathing." The new lens is wider ! I have both and I can see it's not even close. The MK ll doesn't focus nearly as close either, and that doesn't help me at all.
The new lens has a zoom lock and I'm not sure why since the zoom ring is so stiff.

I appreciate the deal from BuyDig.com and Canon Rumors, and I'm glad I purchased the lens. For the extra $1000, I sure wish the focal length and minimum focus distance matched the older, less expensive zoom.

drmikeinpdx · Jun 23, 2013

I'm going to be doing some nighttime urban shots without a tripod using available light from streetlights and nightclubs. I'm expecting to make use of the high ISO abilities of my 5D Mark 3. A grainy, black and white motif is the plan.

I am wondering about which lenses to take along on this shoot, and here is my question:

How much does the maximum aperture of a lens affect autofocus performance in low light conditions? I can select from lenses with max apertures ranging from F/1.4 to F/4. Will the Mark 3 be able to focus better in marginal light with the larger aperture lenses? Or does it depend more on the mysterious magic of the autofocus system in each particular lens and how it talks to the corresponding microprocessor in the body?

I've seen some discussion of the 6D being able to focus down to EV-1, or something like that, but nobody ever says if that varies with the lens that is attached to the camera. It seems to me like it should. Hopefully one of our resident experts can bring this issue into sharp focus! LOL

jdramirez · Jun 22, 2013

I'm an amateur photographer and I think I'm looking to take that step to semi-professional photog. There is a Civil War reenactment coming up and the opportunity to hangout on the "battle field" and snap a few action shots has come up. If they paid me in donuts and cocaine, I'd probably do it despite being on a diet and drug free since '83 (I just liked the rhyme... there isn't a story about what happened in 1983 when I was 6 years old).

Well, compensation is $100 for the day which would amount to maybe a 90 minute round trip drive for me and probably a 2 hour "battle". Seriously how long could a reenactment last? I presume I would give up all copyright over my photos and they would potentially be published as a calendar, postcards, or in a book. I might get a credit in a book, but I would doubt I would keep any rights to the images.

So is that a fair offer? Again... I'm going to do it... but I read an article a few years ago about not working for peanuts or free because that just hurts the entire industry.

I haven't been offered the gig yet or told the specific details about residuals, but I am also trying to be realistic and not being too naive.

Thanks for responding. John Mulaney has a line about being naive. You're gonna give me a whole $100 for all my songs Mr. Gordy?!?

Tabor Warren Photography · Jun 22, 2013

I was shooting a bridal after a wedding this afternoon and dropped my UWA about 4 feet onto the concrete.
Good thing these are built like tanks.

Cheers,
-Tabor

Threads

Threads

Locked EF 24-70mm f4... bad below 3m focusing distance?

Locked EOS-M or 100D

Locked Poll Poll Pick between two options for the Canon 7D II

which sensor would you prefer in the 7D II

24 MP, "usable" ISO up to 1600, 6 FPS

16 MP, "usable" ISO up to 6400, 9 FPS

Locked The ULTIMATE Canon lens

Attachments

Locked 24-70mm f4 vs 24-105mm f4 (video + still)

Locked Stabiliser for 60D

Locked Nifty 50 or Shorty 40?

Locked Remote video activation

Locked Canon 35mm f2 IS

Locked Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II Mentioned [CR1]

Locked EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x Review from TDP

Locked 5D III and EX 580 II flash problems

Locked How do you carry your tripod?

Locked Does it make sense to keep my EF 100mm f2.0?

Locked 24mm options...

Locked Poll Poll How ready is your camera gear usually?

How long to gather all (required) your gear?

They are all in the car already, 0 min

All in my bag, just pick it up and go, <1 min

Most in the bag, maybe flash or one lens is somewhere around, <5 min

Around certain area, just need to gather them, <10 min

Here and there around the house, might find them all <30 min

Not sure about the battery or card space, I think I know where the camera is, <1 hour

Haven't used for while, not sure of location, and battery flat for sure, >1 hour

Locked If You Could Have One 1 Lens...

Locked Beginner lens

Locked Monopod for 600mm II - advice needed

Locked FD to EF lens adapters

Locked A used 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM worth to buy for ~750 USD

Locked Canon 24-70 2.8 ll, Thanks BuyDig.com and Canon Rumors

Locked How does max lens aperture affect low light autofocus?

Locked REVISED W/ CONTRACT INFO Is this a fair offer for an on location job?

Locked Just Dropped my 17-40L...

Filter

Forum statistics

Latest albums

Gallery statistics

Locked

EF 24-70mm f4... bad below 3m focusing distance?

Locked

EOS-M or 100D

Locked

Poll

Pick between two options for the Canon 7D II

Locked

The ULTIMATE Canon lens

Locked

24-70mm f4 vs 24-105mm f4 (video + still)

Locked

Stabiliser for 60D

Locked

Nifty 50 or Shorty 40?

Locked

Remote video activation

Locked

Canon 35mm f2 IS

Locked

Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II Mentioned [CR1]

Locked

EF 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x Review from TDP

Locked

5D III and EX 580 II flash problems

Locked

How do you carry your tripod?

Locked

Does it make sense to keep my EF 100mm f2.0?

Locked

24mm options...

Locked

Poll

How ready is your camera gear usually?

Locked

If You Could Have One 1 Lens...

Locked

Beginner lens

Locked

Monopod for 600mm II - advice needed

Locked

FD to EF lens adapters

Locked

A used 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM worth to buy for ~750 USD

Locked

Canon 24-70 2.8 ll, Thanks BuyDig.com and Canon Rumors

Locked

How does max lens aperture affect low light autofocus?

Locked

REVISED W/ CONTRACT INFO Is this a fair offer for an on location job?

Locked

Just Dropped my 17-40L...