Tripod heads?

Right now I'm using an off-center Gitzo tripod head like this one:

http://www.gitzo.us/series-2-magnesium-off-center-ball-head

It works great when shooting in landscape orientation, but once I turn to portrait orientation, the camera starts slipping on the plate and it ends up tilting down a bit.

Is there anyway to fix this? I was looking at the Really Right Stuff L plates and those seemed cool, but I can't really justifying buying a RRS head just for that...

Canon EOS 7D Mark II in 2014 [CR2]

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href=""></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="">Tweet</a></div>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 7D Mark II

</strong>The Canon EOS 7D will finally get replaced in the first half of 2014. The exact announcement and availability dates are unknown at this time, but we’re told it will come in the first half of 2014.</p>
<p>The new camera will be a “pro APS-C” camera and be priced around the $2000 USD mark. It will have a new sensor, as well as a variation of a new autofocus system that it will share with a new EOS-1 body.</p>
<p>Wifi, GPS and a the biggest LCD screen in Canon’s lineup will appear on the camera.</p>
<p>More to come….</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Auto Focus: 5D, Mark III, Photographing in Dark Clubs

I shoot a lot of jazz in nightclubs with particularly low light. I am curious what Autofocus settings others who photograph in similar situations use. The "Cases" don't really address musicians: The focus is on sports and birds. I am always surprised how much a standup bass player moves.

If not using the Cases, do you opt for focus or release priority? Servo or simple AF? I am inclined to go for focus priority. Even though focus priority is much slower, in low light release priority seems to be a problem.

Please keep in mind that these are not rock concerts with lots of stage lighting.

Thanks

Jack Siegel

The Nikon DFB – Burberry Edition

TOKYO – Following on the heels of the revolutionary Nikon DF, the Nikon Corporation is pleased to announce the fashionable DFB – the Burberry Edition, a Nikon FX digital SLR camera. The stylish DFB literally screams “Do more with less, but look sharp while doing it!” The DFB features the beloved 12.1 MP sensor from the Nikon D3 and D700. The file sizes produced by the DFB will be a welcome relief to those who demand smaller file sizes and less photographic detail, and are genuinely concerned about conserving hard drive space.


http://photographylife.com/announcing-the-nikon-dfb-burberry-edition

;D ;D ;D

Las Vegas questions

Hi Guys,

So I am tagging along with the wife to a work trip to LV (from the UK) this weekend and it seems I will have at least two days of "dead time" without her during the day.

Is it worth taking the camera and are there shots worth grabbing during the day, excluding major places like the canyon as she will also want to see that?

Kit wise any suggestions, keep it light for travel? I have a 5d3, 24-70 2.8 II, 50 1.4, 70-200 2.8 I and a 600 speedlight

Many thanks in advance.

Canon EOS-1D C Meets EBU HD Tier 1 Imaging Requirements for Broadcast Production

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=14675"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=14675">Tweet</a></div>
<p><b>TOKYO, Japan, November 12, 2013</b> — Canon Inc. today announced that the EOS-1D C digital SLR camera, part of the company’s Cinema EOS System lineup of digital cinematography products, has been independently tested in accordance with European Broadcasting Union (EBU)1 standards for HD content acquisition.2 The tests found that the EOS-1D C is the first digital SLR camera to satisfy the stringent testing criteria for HD production.</p>
<p>Results indicated that the EOS-1D C provides “exceptional” HD resolution from a 4K source with “very low” aliasing, and “good” color performance and motion portrayal. The test results also confirmed that the EOS-1D C camera system and its imaging performance comply with the recommended specification for inclusion in HD Tier 1 for HD production.3</p>
<p>A new free-of-charge firmware update for the EOS-1D C to be made available on November 12 will enable the camera to correct for insufficient peripheral illumination when outfitted with supporting EF Cinema Lenses4 and make possible audio line input.</p>
<p>Additionally, an enhanced version of the EOS-1D C’s dedicated EOS MOVIE Utility software for Macintosh5 and Windows,6 scheduled to be made available free of charge in late December, adds a Mac-version video playback function and the ability to capture consecutive still images from a video file.</p>
<p>Canon will continue striving to enhance the functionality of its Cinema EOS System, contributing to further expanding the realm of visual expression and the development of cinematic culture.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/855962-REG/Canon_EOS_1D_C_EOS_1D_C_4K_Cinema.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Canon EOS-1D C at B&H Photo</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Effective focal length of some telephotos

A current thread on the resolving power of lenses has got me thinking about how to compare the resolution of lenses using MTFs in terms of line pairs. Here is an attempt to rationalise this, which may be wrong. So, if it is wrong or it is of any use, please comment. The basic idea is to use the data that the Photozone and lenstip sites give for the maximum resolution of a lens and the observed resolution at different f-stops in terms of line pairs.

We know that if you get closer to a subject, you get better resolution. From simple optical theory, the resolution depends upon (1/distance) from the subject because the size of the image depends on 1/distance. If you are at half the distance, the image will be twice the size and you have effectively doubled the resolution of the lens. So, if you have a lens that has half the the resolution of a perfect lens, then if you stand at half the distance away as you would with a perfect lens, you would obtain the same resolution as would the perfect lens. So, I calculated the ratio of observed/maximum for different lenses and multiplied the ratio by the stated focal length. This then gives the effective telephoto length. In the following Table, the effective focal length is the distance you would have to stand from the subject to get the resolution stated by the manufacturer. OK, I know there are caveats depending on AA filters, breathing, stated focal lengths being an exaggeration etc, but there some interesting trends.

Lens focal length f number Effective focal length (mm)

400L 400 5.6 324
400L 400 8.0 330
100-400L 400 5.6 325
100-400L 400 8.0 330

300L f/4 300 4.0 235
300L f/4 300 5.6 254
300 f/4L+1.4xTC 420 5.6 265
300 f/4L+1.4xTC 420 8.0 273

300 f/2.8 II 300 2.8 282
300 f/2.8 II 300 4.0 293

Sigma 150-500 370 6.3 257
Sigma 150-500 370 8.0 265
Sigma 150-500 370 11.0 273
Sigma 150-500 500 6.3 261
Sigma 150-500 500 8.0 299
Sigma 150-500 500 11.0 315

The Sigma at 500mm gives only the resolution of a 300mm lens. Adding a 1.4xTC to the 300mm f/4 gives only an effective 1.1xTC. The 400L and 100-400L are equivalent to a perfect 330mm lens.

The agreement between lenstip data and photozone was pretty for overlaps - I used a maximum of 46 for the lenstip data.

Expected pricedrop for the Canon 1dx?

Hello, long time lurker and first-time poster!
I have a question regarding the 1DX. Currently I own a 5d2 and a 5d3, both gripped and nearly a dozen L-lenses and I use these bodies almost always together on an assignment. Through the CPS-program I was glad using a 1DX for a month and it blew my mind for how accurate this thing really is in low light (80% of my work environment) across the whole AF area and the output of the images are simply outstanding! Man what a magical camera this is! I'm back using the 5d3 now, even though the images and the controls are very similar but it is a lot harder to get the keepers I want (and slower/tracking to focus). I never knew the difference would be this big for me and I find myself missing the 1DX tremendously.
Now to my question and the need vs want dilemma. Even though I could afford the 1DX now, but it will hurt my pockets deeply and I would rather use those funds for traveling and taking more pictures! The price is a little too high for me and seeing the camera is out for quite some time, do you think there would be pricedrop in the near future? I considered to buy it second hand and I see quite some good deals but my insurance cannot guarantee full service so that is a problem. For me the near future is in and around Q1 2014 where I have a shitload of assignments piled up until the summer and a camera this capable could be really useful in those situations.
Thanks!

Some sand in Canon 24-70 L...

I was shooting near some sand dunes about a month ago and some fine sand got into my focus ring... >:(

I thought the sand would just grind itself away, but every time I turn the focus ring, I still hear a slight grinding sound. Someone told me to use a vacuum and it helped a bit, but there's still a bit of grinding.

Any ideas? I heard shipping it to Canon for service is around $300?

Back up body? What would you do?

Hi all,

I have a 7D with an EFS lens that I have not touched in nearly 6 months. I bought a 5D MK III last March and tried to like my 7D after that! Sorry, I just love that 5D MK III. I thought I would keep the 7D as a backup body but keep wondering if I really should. I want to get a very expensive Canon lens and when I say very expensive you may guess which one that is with a price tag of over 10K. So, I am trying to get bucks here and there anyway possible. I know I may only get a little over $1000 for the entire setup but that would be 10% of what I need. I travel on occasions but on two trips now did not take the 7D along. Do you think I should sell it or just hang on to it and start being more diligent about taking a backup body along? I have never had a Canon body quit yet (in spite of some abuse). For the prior 7 years I have only had one body along when I traveled. It seems to me it is time to part with it but I keep hesitating.

Thanks all,

Tom

How many megapixels can these lenses resolve?

Here are two screenshots from Photozone regarding the 17-40L resolution @ 17mm and the Samyang 14mm resolution. They can be found at: Samyang 14mm (http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/532-samyang14f28eosff?start=1) and Canon 17-40L (http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/427-canon_1740_4_5d?start=1)

I am wondering if anyone can interpret the numbers presented, specifically at f8 and f11, regarding how many megapixels these lenses can resolve. Thanks in advance.

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-11-11 at 10.38.46 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-11-11 at 10.38.46 AM.png
    56.9 KB · Views: 1,356
  • Screen Shot 2013-11-11 at 10.42.32 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-11-11 at 10.42.32 AM.png
    62 KB · Views: 1,329

canon 70-200f2.8L is USM ii vs tamron 70-200 2.8 VR

I am planning to buy a 70-200 Lense. Need some suggestion on the following lenses

1. Canon 70-200 f2.8L USM II

2. Tamron 70-200 f2.8 VR

I am using Canon 50D. Need to know which one is better lens and why.... The price wise the tamron is less than a half of canon.

Also need to know if 2X Canon extender can be used with Tamrom 70-200 2.8 VR for Canon.

Thanks in advance for the for helping me choosing the right lens.

Regards

Sujeet

F1 Photography Advice

Hi folks.

I'll be going to the Malaysian F1 Grand Prix next year and i'm looking for some advice on what kit would be best to take. I have grandstand tickets on the pit straight for all three days and also might get pit lane access probably on the practice day through a friend who works for one of the teams.

I currently have an Eos 50D, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 28-135, and Canon 55-250. I have been considering selling the 55-250 and getting a 70-200 F4. Would this be a good idea or would the extra reach of the 55-250 be more useful.

Thanks

Canon Japan Teases a White Kiss

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/11/canon-japan-teases-a-white-kiss/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/11/canon-japan-teases-a-white-kiss/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><strong>From Canon Japan’s Facebook

</strong>Canon Japan is now teasing us with a little promo called “White Kiss”. As you probably know, Rebel level cameras in Japan are called “Kiss”. So this is another sign that Canon will be launching a white Rebel of some kind. We’re not sure if this will be a global product, or just in select countries.</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=540634619350769" target="_blank">View Canon Japan Teaser</a></strong></p>
<p>Source [<a href="http://digicame-info.com/2013/11/white-kiss.html" target="_blank">DC</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,435
Messages
973,492
Members
24,799
Latest member
MinhThe

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB