New To canon

Whats going on guys!

I'm moving to the dark side.... and ditching my Nikon.

Anyways, I'm going to pick up a 5D Mark iii here in a couple days and I'm wondering a few things you guys may be able to help me out with.

My main Subjects: (Still Life, Models, Cars, Families)

- What lens would be a good lens for general use right now? I'm debating between the 24-70 or the 24-105. I have to much invested in glass with my nikon to spend money on more than one lens right now. I have noticed "L" series mentioned, and I have also noticed there are quite a few dfferen't priced 24-70's.

- What flash should I go with? Do I need a transmitter for the flash?

- What is a quality battery grip?

I appreciate your help!

Review: Canon EF-S 55-250 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=14585"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=14585">Tweet</a></div>
<p><strong>From The-Digital-Picture

</strong>Bryan over at The-Digital-Picture has completed his review of the surprisingly good Canon EF-S 55-250 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM.</p>
<p><strong>Says Bryan

</strong><em>“After using this lens a healthy amount including on a couple of short-duration trips in addition to locally, I have to admit that keeping this lens in my kit has been a consideration for me. The results it delivers are quite good. The 55-250 IS STM is a very good option for those times when traveling light is very highly desirable including trail running, hiking, traveling, etc.”</em></p>
<p>You can read the rest of the <a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-55-250mm-f-4-5.6-IS-STM-Lens.aspx" target="_blank">review here</a>.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1001311-USA/canon_8546b002_ef_s_55_250mm_f_4_5_6_is.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Canon EF-S 55-250 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM at B&H Photo </a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>

100-400L on 70D?

I have a Canon 100-400L that is very sharp on my XTi. I would like to use it to shoot still photos and video of sitting small birds (warblers) or small birds moving about in vegetation (low light) on a to be purchased 70D. Do any of you who have posted the many fine bird photos on this forum have experience with a 100-400L on a 70D?
Your comments will be greatly appreciated.

Canon 6D stuck pixels - Please Help

Hi,

Please can anyone help?

I've notices a cluster of 3x3 pixels located near the centre of the frame in jpegs taken with my new 6D. I've tried the manual sensor cleaning then turning the camera off trick but to no avail. The centre pixel is bright white surrounded by a square of pixels. While this isn't visible against a bright background I would need to edit it out of every other image. I tend to crop images and this only makes the stuck pixels more obvious. Is this normal or should I return the camera?

I haven't had this problem since my ancient Canon G2 so I'm concerned to see stuck pixels again after a run of good luck with other Canon DSLRs.

Kind regards,


Martyn

Attachments

  • Stuck pixel.jpg
    Stuck pixel.jpg
    405.3 KB · Views: 1,743

Speedlite Recycle Time and Custom Function 12

I've been having some issues with my 600 RTs not firing consistently. First shot or two fine, then nothing, then fires, then nothing. Half the frames are black and I'm missing poses.

At first I thought it was a problem with the ST-E3 burning through batteries, but putting fresh batteries in did nothing. I thought maybe something was overheating, but that doesn't seem to be the case either.

Now I'm pretty sure that it isn't the ST-E3, but that it is just waiting for the 600 RTs to recycle. I always use battery packs on the speedlites and before the last shoot I checked all my Enloops and they were at least at 80% capacity. (I recharged any that were below 80%).

Now, I'm checking the manual and I see Custom Function 12 -- which switches the recycling over to the battery packs exclusively.

Wondering, will I have better luck with CF12 or will that make it worse? Do I really need to top off all the batteries before every shoot. (With battery packs we're talking about 60 batteries). Anything I've overlooked? Anyone else ever have this issue?

5D Mark iii questions (mostly AF)

Hello

I'm updating my kit, that I use mostly on wedding and event photography.

I'm looking for high quality results while shooting high ISO (good to very good quality at 6400, and more than usable until one stop higher if needed): that is really my main concern (I don't have very fast primes nor the stabilized 70-200 zoom, so I need to shoot at 1/200 in poorly lit churches).

Coming from a 5D2, better AF performance would be nice, although I learned to get around the old 9 point AF system.

Just sold the 5D2 and the 7D and I'm considering a pair of 6D's or a 5D3.

They're different cameras, and they're priced differently =) Two 6D's cost the same as one 5D3, so I have to choose between a buying a kit (two bodies, for flexibility and, more important, backup! in case anything happens) or buying one camera alone (I still have a 550D/T2i, that sometimes I use for video) and adding another camera on the long run.

I've read and read about both cameras and I'm aware of the 6D limitations. What I'm trying to do here is to break a few of the 5D3 specific capabilities or specs and decide if they will work in such way that I find the camera is worth the extra money, or not. Henceforth, a have a few doubts:

- How many AF points can we register to access via MF-n button (or other)? Just one?

- What’s the current state of things regarding AF points illumination? AF is illuminated prior to focus or only after focus is achieved? (I was confused after reading several threads about last April's firmware update)

- Any issues regarding AF with the Tamron 24-70 VC? (I know there’s a thread about that, but it hasn’t been updated recently)

And that's all, for now.
Thanks for your help.

Image of the New 100-400?

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/10/image-of-the-new-100-400/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/10/image-of-the-new-100-400/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><strong>*UPDATE 2*

</strong>Another suggestion from a man who <a href="http://www.lensrentals.com" target="_blank">knows everything about lenses</a>.  He thinks it’s a “28-300 with filter barrel removed”.</p>
<p><strong>*UPDATE*

</strong>It seems most people think it’s the Sony 70-200, though the body does look like a Canon.</p>
<p><strong>I’m not sure

</strong>Below is an image posted on the Google Plus account of Peter Norvig. In the low resolution image, a lens that I don’t recognize is being used. I have compared it to the 28-300L, 100-400L and 70-200L and it doesn’t match up with any of them.</p>
<p><strong>Says Peter

</strong><em>“For Canon fans, you might find this exciting. A photographer was using this lens. I assert that the black stripes of the focus and zoom rings are the wrong width and placement to be either the 70-200 or the 100-400; therefore I speculate this is a prototype of the long-rumored 100-400 II.”</em><strong>

</strong></p>
<p>What do you guys and gals think?</p>
<div id="attachment_14573" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 585px"><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/canon-002.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-14573" alt="Click for Larger" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/canon-002-575x431.jpg" width="575" height="431" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click for Larger</p></div>
<p>Source: <a href="https://plus.google.com/108640673873589796416/posts/fK7VDM6yxKM">Peter Norvig G+</a> thanks to John</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff00ff;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Old lenses - really so bad?

Today I got my "new" 70D back from the shop I bought it in Munich. They exchanged it, after an system breakdown (posted).
My question: The shop assistents told me to exchange 2 of my lenses. I own an 70-200mm 2.8L and an 28-70mm L 2.8. I bought them about 7-8 years ago and they work well.
Are they really so "sub" using them on the 70D?
They said, that the 70D requires an IS Lens, the 70-200 II or the 24-70 2.8 II (no IS). Is this true?

MTx
Dani

The Narrows in Zion National Park HD (6D)

I just finished hiking The Narrows! For the avid trekkers, hikers and photographers, this is a wonderland of beautiful soft light, textures, colors and above all, solitude and simplicity.
The Narrows “top-down” hike is 16-miles in total, and consists of 50-60% of walking through the Virgin River. I hiked The Narrows recently and as a first-timer, I was a bit surprised at how tricky it can be. I created this site to help you – the potential hiker – get out there hiking the narrows.

Hiking The Narrows in Zion National Park HD

In additional to hundreds of landscape photographs, I captured some HD video and I just finished cutting it all in Final Cut. Let me know what you think!

Hiking-The-Narrows.jpg

Grand Teton NP Closure and Star Trail Photography (6D)

I recently finished a trip traveling to 20+ national parks in search of fall colors. It was unfortunate to say the least to hear of the park closures in the midst of beautiful fall colors.

When I got to Grand Teton National Park having just driven a few hours from Banff National Park, Canada, I was hopeful that the parks would open in time. Sadly they did not. Mormon Row, however, was a short 1-mile hike in from the barricade, so I decided to do the early morning hike in. This location is often called the most photographed location in North America, and I'm not sure if it's Mormon Row or Maroon Bells, but in any seeing tons of photographers yelling out to each other about being in their shots is quite the standard sight. It was quite nice having the entire place to myself. The quietness and solitude of that morning is sure not to repeat itself until the next park closure.

All of the below images were shot on the Canon EOS 6D. Kind of a side note, but I recently reviewed this camera with 10+ months of hands-on experience, check it out here and let me know what you think: 6dreview.com

Grand-Teton-Star-Trail-933s.jpg

Grand Teton Mountain Range Star Trails @ 933 seconds, F/5.0, ISO 320 at 17mm with in-camera white balance. I captured the above single frame photograph with the Canon 17-40mm L on the Canon EOS 6D with a Canon intervalometer.

Grand-Teton-Star-Trails.jpg

184 frames (12GB) captured at 32 seconds, F/5.0, ISO 320 at 17mm. The above star trail photograph is was captured with the same camera setup as mentioned before.

Grand-Teton-Mormon-Row-Sunrise-1.jpg

Grand Teton Mormon Row Sunrise Long Exposure 6:22AM @ 180 seconds, f/22, ISO 125, 30mm.

Grand-Teton-Mormon-Row-Sunrise-2.jpg

Grand Teton Mormon Row Sunrise Long Exposure 6:42AM @ 180 seconds, f/22, ISO 50, 30mm.

For the post on my site plus an image of the same frame but in August visit: http://www.grahamclarkphoto.com/grand-teton-closure-star-trails/

If you have any questions on any of the images let me know!

Graham

Canon USA website & product reviews - Canon S-120

So much for allowing fair and honest reviews of their products...
Yes, it's a rant :o

I got a new Canon S120 for my wife, and after a few outings with it, I summarized my impressions along with her feedback about it.
Well, it did not pleased Canon very much, as they refused my comments, saying that did follow their reviewing guidelines...
I wonder if it was because I call them cheap (sort of) by not printing a user guide anymore (btw, their pdf is locked and can't print it to a better sizing and layout), forcing one to download ALL software from the web, and not even providing any media cables.
The not so great battery performance is a known issue; the shady Wi-Fi usefulness too, and even the touch-and-shot failed mode is already documented
Aside that, it's a great TRUE pocketable camera, with advanced shooting modes - no, does not replace a DSLR, nor par with some 4/3 or mirrorless, but for the size and performance there is no equal - the rx100 1 &2 are not true pocket cameras, and lack of an easy MF switch to mode.

so don't waste your time posting there like I did....

First time for video

Hey folks, not only is this a link to my first ever video shoot, but its also my first post to the site. I've been coming here and reading news for the last couple of years, but thought maybe I would start posting as well in my down time.

Anyhow, this is the first video shoot I've ever done with my gear. I've been gathering equipment for quite some time with the idea of shooting video, but I've always been kind of intimidated. Not only that, I was scared of the learning curve of using Premiere as my only previous video editing experience was using Sony Vegas Pro to make a picture slide show.

So I was sought out by a local night club (disclaimer: I am a consultant to them as well) to create promotional material for their upcoming Halloween Party: Hamilton Horror Story (naturally based off of the popular current Television Show). This is what I came up with:

Sizzle and Koi Present - Hamilton Horror Story

Equipment used include a Canon 5DMKII, an old 50mm 2.5 Macro lens, a 70-200 2.8IS II, a 16-35L 2.8, Cinevate mini handle and pull focus, Benro S6 Tripod Head.

All the visuals were shot in and around the club, and I used the staff as the cast members.

Richard Northwood

Issue with second hand EF 300 2.8 IS..Thoughts???

I just picked this lens up second hand where the seller claimed the lens to be in perfect condition and made no mention of the issue. Otherwise the lens is mechanically and cosmetically in great shape. Benefit of the doubt would say that he was unaware of the issue but he does photography for a living.

Your thoughts on whether this is fungus or a lot of dust? It's on the inside side of the 1st two elements all the way around the perimeter of the glass covering the outer edges of the glass (3/4 of an inch band all the way around).

Thanks for your comments!

Attachments

  • DSCF0001 1.JPG
    DSCF0001 1.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 826

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,435
Messages
973,457
Members
24,800
Latest member
MinhThe

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB