• Locked
Video 5D III vs. 1DX

I currently have my 5D III and don´t know if I should get a second 5D III or a 1DX.
I haven´t found a lot of comparsions between them. And if the 1DX would be better in Video too this might give me the push to spend the extra money.
Did somebody here had a look what the 1DX might have as additional features or a better quality over a 5D III?
Thanks all for your comments

  • Locked
Help for Speedlight MT-24 EX / 600EX-RT

I hope someone here knows the answer.
I currently have the 5D III with a 600EX-RT. For my next trip I´m thinking about lightning for macro photos.
My lens for this will be the 100L IS.
I have the RRS B91-QR of camera flash braket and was wondering if I could also use a second 600EX-RT to get a good macro lightning instead of getting a very expensive MT-24 EX just for this.
Pictures will be mosly flowers and maybe a few insects or other animals.
I could set the 600EX with a very wide zoom setting to give a good light and with the bracket I also can change the angle of them.
Good thing with two 600EX would be that I might get a second body ( not sure if I get a 1DX or a second 5D III ) and I could use it there.

Thanks for your suggestions and hopefully there is somebody that tried it and saw the difference in the pictures.

  • Locked
Odd AF microadjustment behavior with a new lens

I received a new zoom lens today I've been playing with and noticed on reviewing the info of some photos that it has AF + or - settings with a variety of numbers, seemingly at random, on most of the photos.

I'm shooting a 5d3 with a new 70-200 2.8 ii lens. The lens just on the camera prior to this was a sigma 50 1.4. The sigma front focuses horribly, despite 2 trips to sigma for recalibration, so on my 5d it corrects well at the max setting of +20, which is set for that sigma lens. What's odd is I have never set any AF microadjust numbers for my other lenses (thanks, canon, for not needing it), and I certainly didn't set them for the new 70-200 2.8 ii.

Even when I went into the AF microadjust settings for the 5d3 I did not see anything set other than 0 for the new 70-200 lens (the camera was set to "adjust by lens" but the settings there were zero).

It seems to have corrected itself after opening the settings for the new lens, changing to a random nonzero, then re-zeroing the number.

There's no way the new lens had embedded AF adjust data, is there? Perhaps I'm just crazy or missing something.

  • Locked
Video Tiem for 650D

I just purchased Cannon 650D for videoing as my son said it’s the way I gotta go rather than video camera. I’m impressed with the contrast & colour, BUT I just discovered it only videos 29mins then turns off…
Does anyone know if there is any way around this as I needed it to record 1-1.5hrs continual?

  • Locked
An open letter to Canon regarding the Canon RT system

To whom it may concern at Canon Inc.,

I am writing this email to express my disappointment with the Canon RT system, particularly the Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT & ST-E3 RT units.

Recently I just purchased a pair of Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT & one ST-E3 RT for my lighting equipment to complement a pair of my Canon 5D mark III & several Canon L lenses.
Prior to that, I was using Speedlite 580EXII, 580EX, 430EX & Phottix Odin radio trigger for most of my off-camera flash photography work.

Just FYI, I decided to sell the above equipment, particularly the Phottix Odin system, to purchase the Canon RT system. Because I thought that using the new Canon RT system with simplified Canon system will help my photography productivity, especially when using off-camera flash.

I found that 600EX-RT & ST-E3 RT system failed to meet my expectations. While there are many improvements compared to the previous generation Speedlite, I found that the Canon RT system has so many limitation that makes it inferior compared to the competitor products, such as Phottix Odin radio trigger system I was using before.

Below are the two major limitations on the Canon RT system that I am really frustrated about:

1. Lack of wireless 2nd curtain sync.
This feature should be easy to be implemented into the Canon RT system. But I am very surprised that Canon decided not to implement 2nd curtain sync in wireless mode. The competitor's products such as Phottix Odin have this feature. I find that the 2nd curtain sync is a very important feature, especially on my photography work. Why would Canon not include this feature, is beyond a common sense & it is unforgivable.

2. Lack of slave zoom control from the transmitter.
Again, this is a feature that the competitor's products like Phottix Odin managed to execute perfectly. Phottix Odin allows the user to change the zoom setting of the slave units from the transmitter.
By having the ability to set the zoom setting of the slave units directly from the transmitter, the user do not required to walk around & manually change the zoom setting on each flash unit. This process will make the photography work much more time-efficient.

I have invested so much money on the Canon DSLR & equipments. I was always happy using the Canon DSLR, but this is the first time I have ever felt that Canon has chosen to become arrogant & give the customer an inferior product / system. Even though I am currently still using pair of my 600EX-RT & ST-E3 RT system for my photography works, I am highly considering to go back to the Phottix Odin system, due to the two major limitations on the Canon RT system I stated above.

However, I still have a little bit of faith in Canon RT system. The Canon RT system has a very great potential if Canon can remove the two major limitations above.

I sincerely hope, or rather HIGHLY DEMAND, that Canon would release a firmware upgrade for the 600EX-RT & ST-E3 RT to add these features:

1. Add wireless 2nd curtain sync.
2. Add slave zoom control in the transmitter unit.


If somehow Canon failed to deliver the firmware updates containing the features above, I am definitely going to GET RID of my Canon RT system and go back to the competitor's product, the Phottix Odin.

Yours sincerely,


A Canon user from Australia

Moderators: You are Too Sensitive

Okay, I see the "purple-faced guy" thread has been deleted.

Honestly, once again this is an example of the moderators having much too thin of skin on this forum. Understand I appreciate the work that moderators do, but this has been an ongoing problem. Threads and comments are allowed to go on for pages and pages and then suddenly, someone decides they don't like the way it ends up, so it gets deleted.

For the record, the OP was an idiot, we all know that. He was taking some sort of perverse jollies out of playing a trolling game that only made him look like a fool. And, yes, his final post should have been deleted for his racist language (that is a legitimate reason to delete any post, although it seems to get applied arbitrarily at times).

But, we are all big boys and girls and we participate in these threads willingly. After two days of discussion, it's kind of silly and, frankly, plays right into the hand of the OP when the entire thread is deleted.

I'm sure I will get attacked for saying this, but I have been participating in this forum for years and I've found this to be annoying and counterproductive. The problem is that it can never be applied uniformly or fairly. Some frequent posters are allowed great latitude to be sarcastic and insulting at times, but others are not.

Just my opinion.

Urban Exploration - filmed with Canon 7D

https://vimeo.com/57522480



It was my journey to the past. I just walked with my camera and saw all this around me....forgotten and it will never wake up again.
With my pictures, editing and sound design i want to bring some life back to this forgotten place ...

a film by Paul Prinz

Facebook: facebook.com/pages/Mindcut/495530123831429
Web: www.mindcutfilms.com

Used Equipment
Canon 7D
Canon EF-S 15-85mm
Kessler Cineslider / motorised

Music bei Ludovico Einaudi (no commercial Use)

Attachments

  • Mindcut_Films_270x117px.jpg
    Mindcut_Films_270x117px.jpg
    5.9 KB · Views: 1,542

  • Locked
300 f4 + 1.4 TC v's 500 f4.5

I've been dabbling with bird photography over the past month or so. The 300 f4 has done a sterling job, but, a 500-600 lens would be more suitable.

I've been offered a Canon 500mm f4.5, which appears to be in very good condition (it was previously owned by a private individual, so, well looked after). The price is around $3,000 which is about standard here in Australia. A new 500mm f4 is, well, worth a small car, and I have one of those (the car) :)

How does the IQ compare between the 300 f4 plus 1.4 TC? I realise that combination doesn't quite make the 500mm mark, but the extra reach is nice.

I'm using a 5D m3.

  • Locked
70-200 f2.8II + 2xIII on 7D vs 300 f4 + 2xIII on 5D3

I currently use a 70-200 2.8 IS II + 2xIII with my 7D when the reach is required. This is maybe 10% of the time I use that lens at most and is why I went that route. When I do need the equivalent 640mm, it is for shooting my 4 children all involved in water sports (human powered, so focus speed not as much of an issue). With that range I still need to crop some times, but as I'm a hobbiest the long range superteles are not justified, and stand out to my wife as obviously being very expensive. Once the kids are at a more competitive level I may rent once in a while for fun.

I would love to upgrade to a 5DIII this summer, but the 600mm focal length gets very expensive in FF, with the exception of the 300 f4 when I already have the 2xIII. Virtually everyone on here seems to say once you go 5DIII or 1DX the 7D collects dust. I could not justify keeping it and would sell it and the only EF-S lens, the 10-22.

Now lots of people love the 300 f4, but it gets bashed when discussing using it with 2x. However, I think the bashing isn't completely justified, it is being compared to more expensive lenses. When I compare the ISO 12233 against the Sigma 120-300 2.8 that is 3 times the price, the Sigma is only comparable in the center with or without converters, for example.

On the ISO 12233 charts the 24-105 can be compared between a 60D and FF, the lenses in question can not. Obviously it is not as sharp on a 60D/7D sensor.

So the question is, even though the 70-200 combination will get the best image to the image circle, will capturing that image on the 7D sensor degrade it enough to be about equal to the 300 f4 combination image captured on the 5DIII sensor. Equal image at almost equal focal distance, and hence still relatively equal cropping ability.

I'm hoping to benifit from the obvious upgrade for 90% of use without loosing quality at 600 mm with the suggested option.

WOW, that took way more words than I thought it would!

  • Locked
Resistance to Larger Filter Size, Kills Great Lenses?

It's well known, based on patents, photographs of prototypes and confirmation by Canon reps themselves that Canon did not release their frontrunning 24-70mm f/2.8 IS prototype because they thought people would resist the 95mm filter size. I really don't understand this at all.

Is filter size really that big a deal to you guys? It seems like many people would trade their left kidney for this lens, but god forbid you have to buy new UV filters and polarizers. The Nikon 14-24mm, Canon 14mm f/2.8 II & the Canon 8-15mm fisheye, and sigma 50-500mm, along with many of the supertelephoto lenses either don't use filters or use huge ones and people love those lenses.

Is Canon right in thinking such a lens was had a front element that was too big, are photographers really that thickle? People complained hugely about the 82mm filter size of the 24-70mm f/2.8 II alone so I wouldn't be surprised.

  • Locked
making a case for that crop body camera

A crop camera body utilizes the center portion of a full frame camera's FOV using the same lens, but...according to Canon's MTF characteristics,
that's precisely where most lenses are at their best.
Therefore that crop camera only gives you the very best of that lens.
If you need a larger image in a landscape scenario...photomerge is a no-brainer, just use a longer lens.

  • Locked
6D vs 5D2 in camera JPEG sharpening method

i've been using 7D and sometimes 5D2 for at least 3 years until i bought 6D recently and love very much for its handling, feature, and high ISO quality, but i notice slight (or maybe big) difference in camera JPEG sharpening method. anyway, both are wonderful full frame camera.

in this condition i compare 6D and 5D2. On the image below, i'm using same studio light setting. in 5D2 the images seems crispier rather than in 6D. i think 6D using unsharp mask method like in photoshop. Personally i like 5D2 in camera JPEG sharpening method rather than 6D, but luckily i often use RAW file, so i can manage my own sharpening method.

and my question is :
1. does anyone ever notice this? or any explanation for this condition?
2. do we can change in camera JPEG sharpening method ?

6D 100% crop

6D by yedija luhur, on Flickr

5D2 100% crop

5D2 by yedija luhur, on Flickr

  • Locked
Considering Super Tele Options

I've got a fairly complete kit now, however, there is one thing still missing and that's a super tele lens.

I'm trying to decide between the 400mm f2.8L IS II and the 600mm f4 IS II. I'm thinking the 400mm gives me a lot more options when I add the 1.4 and 2X extenders and would bring me to the same f-stop as the 600. Both lenses seem similar in weight although the 600 is a bit longer. Would they both be about the same in terms of ability to hand hold? How much does the image degrade with the extenders? Has anyone tried these two setups? What are your impressions/recommendations?

Thanks in advance.

  • Locked
Need advice on telephoto zoom Lens

I currently own a EOS 40D, 17-40mm F4L, 100MM Macro Non L, 70-300mm IS Non L and 28-135mm Kit lens. I have made a decision to upgrade my 40D to 5D Mark III kit. Since the rebate is ending today, I decided to wait until the next rebate or price drop if that happens. I was also thinking of adding the 70-200mm F4 IS L lens to my collection. Then another thought came to my mind. Sell the 70-300mm IS USM and buy the 70-300mm IS L or 100-400MM IS L and forget about the 70-200 mm F4 IS L. What would be the best decision, 70-300MM L, 100-400MML or keep my 70-300 non L and buy 70-200mm IS f/4 L. I considered 70-200mm L for its sharpness even though I decided to keep the 70-300MM for the reach. I never used the 70-300mm L or 100-400mm L. I read the reviews on thedigitalpicture.com and they are high on 70-200mm lenses. Please advice. thanks in advance.
Also any idea, how much I can ask for the 70-300mm IS USM? its 4.5yrs old and is in excellent condition. this is the first time I am trying to sell a lens. thought of starting with Craigslist. any other suggestion?

  • Locked
Hello from yet another newcomer!

Hello to everyone! This site has interested me for a couple of years, but I only just got around to joining. The information and opinion I read, are usually time well spent. I commend you all for your time, effort, and knowledge.

I chose Canon because, well, it seemed like the best brand at the time. It still does. I dare say, it is.

I freely admit that I am not the photographer I want to be, yet. Also not sure what it is I do want to be. But I am not young anymore, I'm middle aged. I hope you all can tolerate my input. I admit I need to learn restraint, given what's happened in the past...in a different online forum, in a different hobby.

My education is undergraduate in Fine Art, graphic design. I never have gone very far with that. Everyone suddenly had to become a web designer, and that never interested me. It probably should have. Maybe I need to learn to write mobile apps before that becomes obsolete? Haha...

I didn't become heavily interested in digital photography until 2007, 2008. I did participate in the film era, but didn't do much with it. The photographer Marc Adamus, with his cover shot of Crater Lake in 2007 or so, was sort of what really sparked my inner photo artist. I have since owned several digital cameras, and two DSLR's. I have a very few quality lenses, but have rented quite a few others. I have probably shot over 30,000 images, but I don't have my own website...yet. One of my photos has been published once, last year, in a national magazine. At this time, I have kind of run out of images to submit, that are on that level. I live in the South, and we don't have Yosemite or Yellowstone out our front doors...but we still have some nice scenery. I admit the western USA (and Canada) have better scenery, but I still prefer living here.

I am beginning to think, that photography as we know it, won't exist a few decades from now, so I am happy I can participate in it, while it does exist...and happy to see the work of others. I tend to get lost in my artistic passions at times, which inhibits getting work done. I also have a reaction when I see a really decent photograph, which tells me I could never capture a shot that well...even though deep down, I know I probably could get close...it still lingers. Ahh the soul of a troubled artist! Anyone else ever have that feeling?

I also am aware that I can write decently well, and get long-winded...so those of you who stop reading after two sentences, will never have to waste time on me! Also, no, I don't speak aloud like this...if I did, I would be "kitt" the talking car, or some other robot...haha! (and after a decade of typing "LOL"...I just had to give it up...it just feels right to go without it!)

Cheers! Carl

  • Locked
Times running out 5D Mk3 or 1DX

Ok so between refinancing my house and starting my new job I almost forgot the the canon rebate period ends tomorrow. I honestly can't decide between the 5D MK3 and the 1Dx.

I'm a serious amateur and have been focusing in studio the past 18 months. I was asked to shoot my nephews daughters baptism and the low light conditions in the church was just awful, still using a T1i. I'm aware of most of the specs on both camera's. The 5D mk3 performs very well in low light and curious is the 1Dx performs just as well.

Which ever camera I decide I'll be pairing it up with the 85mm 1.2

Thanks for your input

  • Locked
*UPDATE* EOS 70D is Coming, The Future of Pro APS-C Will Change

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/02/eos-70d-is-coming-the-future-of-pro-aps-c-is-unknown/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/02/eos-70d-is-coming-the-future-of-pro-aps-c-is-unknown/">Tweet</a></div>
<strong>EOS 70D


</strong>Canon’s Masaya Maeda let it be know that a Canon EOS 70D would be coming “some day in the future. Without fail.” I’d expect one to be announced in the next 45-90 days depending on which report we go with.</p>
<p>What to expect feature wise? I’ve been told two contrasting theories about the upcoming camera.</p>
<p>One, that it will be a relatively lateral upgrade to the EOS 60D, a few subtle improvements and priced around $1000.</p>
<p>The other reports that have leaked in, is the xxD line would return to where the 50D was in terms of build quality and size. We’d be going back to a more semi-professional style camera. If this happens, that would definitely change the EOS 7D’s place in the lineup.</p>
<p><strong>EOS 7D Mark II

</strong>There has been little talk about the next “pro” APS-C camera lately. I’m of the belief, if and when one comes, it will be a new segment for APS-C performance and features, and probably at a higher price point.  If the 70D returns to its roots, is there room for a high performance $2000+ APS-C camera? That question could probably be debated for a while.</p>
<p>I don’t see a return of APS-H, it needlessly raises the cost to manufacture the camera due to the larger sensor, and we’d still have the inability to get a true wide angle perspective with lenses.</p>
<p>If a pro APS-C camera comes, I can see it borrowing heavily from the EOS-1D X as far as framerate and AF performance go. Build quality would also be quite stellar.</p>
<p>Both Nikon and Canon must be hard at work trying to redefine the segment. The D300 came out in 2007, with a minor “s” upgrade in 2009. The EOS 7D came to us with a lot of fanfare in late 2009. We could be approaching 6 years and 4 years respectively before we get to see what both companies have up their sleeves.</p>
<p>The future is probably full frame across most of the EOS line, but we’re not at that point yet.</p>
<p><strong>*UPDATE*

</strong>During my current travels, I missed an interview Masaya Maeda gave in Japan about the 7D’s successor. Below is a <a href="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/interview/20130124_584693.html" target="_blank">translated part of the interview</a> that talks about the EOS 7D Mark II. It does reaffirm our thoughts that the 7D Mark II will enter new territory.</p>
<p><strong>DKW:</strong> As for the readers of DigiKame Watch, there are many who are waiting for the EOS 7D’s sucessor. Up through the release of last year’s major firmware update, there were many who felt that a new model with even better specs would be released shortly…</p>
<p><strong>MM:</strong> Yes, they would be correct. For us, it’s about looking at what the camera has the potential to be and then adding that to what it can currently do. I do think the current model is still very attractive to buyers. And while we are, of course, developing its successor, it’ll be one that incorporates a certain number of innovative technologies. We will not be putting out a product with merely better specs, but one that has evolved into new territory. But then again, we’re not talking about something a long time from now either.</p>
<p><em>Thanks Dave C for this update</em></p>
<p><strong>Source: [<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/articles/0336328811/cp-2013-interview-with-canons-masaya-maeda" target="_blank">DPR</a>]</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

  • Locked
Metabones Speed Booster -- why only for FF to APS-C?

So I've done a little reading on the Speed Booster from Metabones. Good breakdown here by Roger Cicala at LR:
http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2013/01/metabones-magic

So, the fastest way to describe it is as the reverse of teleconverter. You lose length but gain speed.

I know that every time you bolt on something in series to a lens, something bad usually happens from an IQ perspective. But blowing that off for just a moment, I had a question.

This thing is being positioned as a way to shoot a lens on an APS-C body at about the same focal length as FF (i.e a 50mm shot on an APS-C body + this doodad results in a roughly 50mm FF field of view). It yanks out the crop multiplier, if you will.

However, I am far more interested in focusing the light and simulating a faster lens. Would it be possible to make this work on FF bodies? Could I turn my 50 F/1.4 into something like a 35mm F/1.0 on my 5D3?

(Obviously, this version of speed booster would not work, but in principle, could one make an FF to FF speedbooster?)

Just curious, thx.

- A

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,431
Messages
973,211
Members
24,787
Latest member
Neil Turner

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB