• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

  • Locked
70-200 f4L USM - Price Increasing... ??

I've been watching the EF 70-200 f4L USM (NON-IS). In January it was around $600 and a month or two later it jumped up to around $680. Now I am wondering about another price jump. A few days ago, the price went from $680 to $709, and today on Amazon the one prime reseller is at $719 (others have not yet followed).

So in less than a week, the price has gone up $30-$40. Any reason for this to be happening?

-Pie

  • Locked
sigma 120-300 f2.8 OS (The new one)

anyone got one of these? i'm looking for some reviews

my questions to any owners

wondering how it is for AF speed say vs the 70-200 f2.8L IS II
sharpness though the range image quality?
do canon mkIII TC fit onto these?
build quality? I have the 85mm f1.4 is the build and finish the same?

i found this review but it doesnt really cover what i'm chasing
Sigma 120-300 F2.8 OS Review with Sample Images

edit: I found this review wich is a bit better
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/reviews/sigma_120-300os_review.html

  • Locked
Patent: 600 f/4 DO IS & 400 f/2.8 DO IS

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/05/patent-600-f4-do-is-400-f4-do-is-ii/"></g:plusone></div><div id="fb_share_1" style="float: right; margin: 0 0px 0 10px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/05/patent-600-f4-do-is-400-f4-do-is-ii/" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php">Share</a></div><div><script src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share" type="text/javascript"></script></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 70px;"><a class="tm_button" rel="&style=normal&b=2" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/05/patent-600-f4-do-is-400-f4-do-is-ii/"></a></div>
<strong>Patent Time!


</strong>More diffractive optic patents from Canon. This time, another 600 f/4 IS DO lens and a 400 f/2.8 DO IS.</p>
<p>With the cost of the new super telephotos from Canon, I can’t imagine what new DO lenses would cost.</p>
<p>Continue reading for the patent breakdown….</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><strong>Patent Publication No. 2012-88427</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>2012.5.10 Release Date</li>
<li>2010.10.18 filing date</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Example 1</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Focal length f = 585.00mm</li>
<li>Fno 4.12</li>
<li>Image height 21.64mm</li>
<li>Length 468.50mm lens</li>
<li>BF 90.78mm</li>
<li>15 sheets of 9 group lens configuration</li>
<li>One aspherical surface a</li>
<li>2 UD glass sheet</li>
<li>One fluorite</li>
<li>A plane diffraction</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Example 2</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Focal length f = 391.86mm</li>
<li>Fno 2.88</li>
<li>Image height 21.64mm</li>
<li>Length 367.51mm lens</li>
<li>BF 50.01mm</li>
<li>Lens Construction 14 elements in 9 groups sheet</li>
<li>2 2 aspherical surface</li>
<li>1 UD glass sheet</li>
<li>One fluorite</li>
<li>A plane diffraction</li>
<li>Group 3 consists of positive and negative positive</li>
<li>Inner Focus (group 2)</li>
<li>Strengthen the refractive power of the front lens group, and to shorten the overall length, the sensitivity is increased, it is difficult to manufacture and assembly</li>
<li>The number of lens group at the end of the super-telephoto lens is determined by the balance of the total length and chromatic aberration</li>
<li>And shorten the length and reconcile, the correction of chromatic aberration, the number will increase</li>
<li>It is important to the length of each degree</li>
<li>Weight of the first lens group, 70% to 9 on the whole</li>
<li>Canon patents is reduced to three the first group</li>
<li>Aspherical and one eye in group 1 group, field curvature correction, the distortion</li>
<li>Diffractive optical element and the second two groups in the first group, the chromatic aberration correction</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2012-05-23" target="_blank">EG</a>]</p>

  • Locked
Shooting Cooking Videos: How to clean and protect lenses?

Hello all,

I've gotten my 5D Mark III...and part of what I want to do with it, and film my cooking 'show' with it.

That being said...it occured to me, that filming things sautee'ing, and with just the oils, steam, etc..in the air while in the kitchen, I'd run the risk of getting 'gunk' for a better word, on my lenses.

How would you :

1. Clean the lens if it does get oils/debris on it?
2. Protect and prevent oils, moisture, etc....from dirtying the lens?

I'm guessing that using windex is right out the window as an option :)

But seriously....any advice for shooting cooking video and keeping things in lens-land clean and tidy, but if you do get dirty...best way to clean up?

Thanks in advance,

cayenne

  • Locked
A myth of growing from APS-C to Fullframe or Dealing with anachronisms

When I was buying my 40D in 2008, I was thinking well, I'll first get into Canon system and then will grow into fullframe.
And because I am a pure hobbyist, I actually never had neither the money nor the excuse to pay big $ for FF camera and lenses.

In the end I've stuck with Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 (non-VC), Canon 85mm f1.8, Canon 10-22mm, Rokinon fisheye and Canon 55-250mm.

From these lenses only Canon 85mm f1.8 is designed for FF, all others are for APS-C only.
And still these lenses are quite large compared micro43 lenses altough the sensor size difference is not that large.
Indeed, Canon APS-C sensor diagonal is 26.7mm, while m43 is 21.6mm, so the difference is just 5.1mm!
Obviously, size optimisation wasn't a priority task for designers of the lenses I own, as again opposed to m43 system.

With the high quality mirrorless cameras like Olympus E-M5, the rumored Panasonic GH3 and more and more good lenses supporting that system, it seems to me that APS-C system is becoming an anachronism.
Really, for half the weight and close price, one can build similar or better system with m43.

I really see not much point in APS-C cameras anymore. First, they're not a good helpers for you to grow to FF. Second, there is no strong commitment to this format even by manufacturers themselves. They just have produced the most necessary line of lenses, mostly mediocre quality, which is understandably to attract
amateurs by price. In all those years no single really high quality APS-C lens, which would approach to L-glass (apart from maybe the 17-50mm f2.8 by Nikon).

Most importantly I don't see any SYSTEM in APS-C especially by Canon! If it's a system, then where is the EF-S 50-150mm f2.8, which should correspond to 70-200mm in FF?
Sigma is the only helper here :)), where are the primes, like EF-S 15mm, EF-S 22mm, EF-S 35mm 1.8, EF-S 50mm 1.8 etc?

The idea of APS-C was nice - to make amateurs enter into interchangeable lenses world. Now, this role is better fullfilled by m43.
APS-C format was a good dollar-machine, but I believe not anymore.

Will we see slow die-out of APS-C in near future? Or Canikon will be smart enough to trasnform in into more compact format, with less pain to EF-S and DX lens owners?

  • Locked
5D Mk3 possible issue with playing back on camera

Long time lurker, first time poster.

I just upgraded from 7D to 5D mk3.

I've only taken 300 images in RAW so far, but generally very impressed, but I have an issue, which was present from day one.

When reviewing the images back on the camera, the image sometimes appears darker when reviewing it back. However if I press play to come back out of playback mode and then go back to shoot mode and then press play again the image appears normal as I shot it. And after downloading images to the computer they are all fine, its just an on camera problem. I guess its the way the camera is rendering the RAW image to display?

This happens about 1 in 10 shots, and just wondered if anyone else has had this problem? I updated to latest firmware the day I got it.

Any thoughts?

  • Locked
1D Mark IV and 7D (this is not a comparison thread)

No, this is NOT one of those comparison threads that we all just get so sick and tired of. I will not put anyone through this one again! I promise. If people start comparing specs I'll take the dignity of "tempabanning" myself from this formum outright for a minimum of 3 days.

That aside, I have the opportunity to be hired for high school sports photos in my region for this winter and spring. I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this. I also got the opportunity to purchase a relatively low-use used 1D Mark IV but I already have the 7D. My question, from experience, would it be worth it to sell my 7D and use the 1D Mark IV instead? I do have the money to do this, but if in your experiences it is nothing special over the 7D, I won't do it. Additionally, I have a 5D Mark III. Reading the reviews and specs, I just don't know it I'd need a 5D Mark III and a 1D Mark IV. I really don't want to wait on or purchase the high premium 1D X. Seems to me the 1D X would just have very diminishing returns for me, personally. Thanks everyone!

  • Locked
600EX-RT and Battery Charge Level Indicator?

I must be having a "senior moment." I thought I had read a review of the 600EX-RT that said it now had a battery level indicator. The only reference I can find is on page 15 of the Manual that states an indicator will be displayed when it is time to replace the batteries. Also, I don't see any info in the Manual for the location on the LCD panel where that indicator will be displayed?

  • Locked
Sto-Fen OmniBounce for 600EX-RT

Got the new Sto-Fen OmniBounce for the 600EX-RT last week (ordered from Adorama, now B&H has them, too). Fit is very snug - tighter than the ones for the 430EX II. There were early reports that the older one for the 550EX would fit, but I wondered about the gel sensor. On the one for the 600EX-RT, there's a little notch for the gel sensor.

The flash with the Sto-Fen mounted is too large for the Canon pouch (barely - the velcro closure still overlaps by a couple of millimeters), but it's a perfect fit in the Lowepro Quick Flex Pouch 75 AW.

Attachments

  • Sto-Fen.jpg
    Sto-Fen.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 2,282
  • Quick Flex Pouch.jpg
    Quick Flex Pouch.jpg
    35.2 KB · Views: 2,086

  • Locked
Good, well priced monitor?

What is a good, well priced(less than $800 the cheaper the better. Just no trash) monitor that I can purchase?
I am using the 5d3 and would like it to have an HDMI input(with 720P playback while recording) as well as the ability to see different crop modes(2.35:1 needed), focus peaking wouldn't hurt also. If possible(not a deal breaker), would like it to be able to be mounted to the hotshoe.
Any ideas? What are you guys using?

  • Locked
Someone please explain these DXO Mark results?!!

Call me sad, but I've just noticed this:

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Compare-Camera-Sensors/Compare-cameras-side-by-side/(appareil1)/783%7C0/(brand)/Pentax/(appareil2)/676%7C0/(brand2)/Pentax/(appareil3)/680%7C0/(brand3)/Nikon

The K 01 results have been up for some time, but I've just noticed the measurements -specifically those for dynamic range. Can someone please explain how the K01 has nominally the same sensor as the K5 and D7000, but much lower DR. It is virtually identical in all other measurements.

What is going on?

  • Locked
Triggering a 5D MK III with a ST-E3 via my 600 EX RT on my 5D MK II

I am shooting pictures of my friend on a motorcycle track in a couple of days. We have planned a frogs perspective wide-angle shot with either the 14mm F2.8L or my 16-35mm F2.8L II, mounted on the 5D MK III. As there is danger involved by being roadside, we have to use a trigger to get the shots, and I have a st-e3 and a 600 EX RT at my disposal. I will also stand at a safe distance with my 5D MK II with my 70-200mm F2.8L IS II (and maybe the 2x III teleconverter).

Is it possible for me to shoot with my 5D II with an 600 EX RT, and to trigger at the same time the 5D III which stands on a tripod at the same time? If so, does anyone know how to?:)

Or is it better to use the Canon LC-5 (the reach should be good enough, but it is infrared (so do I need to be in front of the receiver to use it?).

Thanks for your reply,

Gerhard.

  • Locked
Some high ISO 5D3 samples from last weekend

This is the hardest I've had to push the ISO on the 5D3 so far, and I'm pleasantly impressed. This isn't meant to inspire pixel peeping (sorry, no 100% crops :) ), but rather to show what's possible with clean ISO 3200-6400 images. I know that's not that high by today's standards, but suffice it to say that I would have never attempted shots like this prior to picking up a 5D3. I f'd up and underexposed the images by 1/2 to 1 stops, but the images cleaned up nicely in Lightroom, and noise wise, are plenty nice enough for a two-page magazine spread.

ISO 3200, exposure pulled 1 stop
_L3C2399-2.jpg


ISO 6400, exposure pulled 1/2 stop. Not enough motion blur in this one for my liking. I really didn't notice much difference in noise between ISO 3200 and 6400.
_L3C2179.jpg


ISO 3200, exposure pulled 1/2 stop. Good sense of motion, but too soft to run large in print. Oh well, maybe next time.
_L3C2479.jpg


A few notes:

1) The AF system is a beast. It was very dark, and the AF locked on effortlessly in AI Servo. On the other hand, the the black AF points are invisible at night when locked onto a black subject. I had to keep hitting the AF selection button to turn the points red in order to ensure they were positioned on the subject correctly.

2) For this set, the in-camera jpeg processing was quite lacking. I shot both raw and jpeg, and the jpegs yielded more noise and less detail than the raws. That's no surprise, but it becomes very evident at 3200-plus ISO. In better-lit scenes, IMHO, the jpegs render adequate detail and quality for my needs up to 3200. For stuff like this, it's raw all the way.

  • Locked
When will the release date be for the 1DXI and 5DmkIV?

Serious question here. I have a 5DMKII and while I'd like to move up to a 1D body the 1DX, while amazing doesn't do it for me on pixels. On both it and the 5DMKIII they've gone for frames and focus which I'm less in need of (though a better focus system then the 5D would be nice)

At any rate, how long will I probably have to wait for the next generation bodies?

  • Locked
Would anyone consider this to be "pro-level" lens choices? Read on..

I am keeping my 5d2 instead of splurging for 5d3. With this choice, and it was a tough one, I decided to update my lenses and here is my budget:

24-105L
70-200/4 IS L

** I will have buy the two lenses above, in addition to currently owning: 1) 17-40L, 2) 35/1.4L, 3)100mm macro, & 4) 50mm 1.8 Mk 1

This is my budget to the max. I am selling my 28-135 & 70-300 IS (non-L) and may even sell my 100mm macro. Am I making a good decision, guys? Please help me feel better about owning f/4.0 L Zooms. This is the absolute best I can afford!! Thanks

  • Locked
Lens of toddler stills and video

Requirement:
Capture moving toddler stills and video indoors in evening or low-light with a 5DMk3 and no external flash.

Context:
Please ignore: lens IQ, colour rnedition, bokeh.
Please consider: lens f-stop, AF speed, MF handling/feedback where applicable.

Questions:
1. Did you find the current EF 24-70L f/2.8 (set ~50mm) fast enough for this?
2. Did you find the need for a (say) EF 50 f/1.4 necessary?
3. Is increasing the ISO (now possible on 5DMk3) a workable option. Why not?
4. Is opting for a Zeiss ZE 50 f/1.4 and resorting to MF/practice a workable option (to the EF 50 f/1.4)?

I realize that handling this in person will sort me out, but i'm trying to guage what folks found/settled on over time and in hindsight. Specifically, if holding out for the EF 24-70L f/2.8 II will suffice or pursuing the ZE 50 f/1.4 still makes sense...assuming i get on with it.

Thanks for your response.

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB