• Locked
New Pancake Lenses

For which focal lengths might Canon pancake lenses be possible in the future. I haven't seen any rumors of any.
I think the 40mm pancake would make a great lens to use for stereoscopic landscape photography. I'm lusting for it and I don't even have a second body... yet. (Yes, I know you can shoot two shots with the same camera by just moving a little bit to the side. But if water or something else moves, then two bodies is the way to go.)
So, what focal lengths can be pancaked?

  • Locked
Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs Blackmagic Design Cinema Camera

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/09/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii-vs-blackmagic-design-cinema-camera/"></g:plusone></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a class="tm_button" rel="&style=normal&b=2" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/09/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii-vs-blackmagic-design-cinema-camera/"></a></div>
<strong>From OneRiver Media


</strong>The folks at OneRiver Media decided to compare the EF model of the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/855879-REG/Blackmagic_Design_BMD_CINECAM26KEF_Cinema_Camera.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Blackmagic Design Cinema Camera</a> with the Canon EOS 5D Mark III. They put both cameras through a battery of tests to compare sharpness, dynamic range, lowlight performance as well as a few others.</p>
<p>OneRiver recommends that you download the video to your computer, as they weren’t completely happy with the compression on Vimeo. Although, even the compressed file shows the differences in the two cameras pretty easily.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/49875510" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Release Information</strong></p>

<blockquote><p>After several DAYS of trying to upload this video to Vimeo, we’ve ultimately had to reduce the bit-rate compression down to 18mbps (Vimeo recommends 5mbps, ha!), which is down from our minimum quality level of 40mbps. This means the SOURCE file you can download will also inhibit some amount of compression blocking and smearing, even in the Cinema Camera footage, which doesn’t originally exist in our ProRes master file. We’ve tried EVERYTHING, multiple types of uploads, different encoding methods, you name it. This is as best as it will get unless someone can host our 40mbps H.264 file (about 3GB) on their server that the world can download from.</p>
<p>Although the downloadable source file is a little better than the streaming version, it still doesn’t compare to the original ProRes source file which imposes no banding, compression artifacts, or chrominance sub-sampling (down from 4:4:4 to H.264′s 4:2:0 space). Please keep this in mind when viewing.</p>
<p>Unfortunately Vimeo only allows 100 downloads per day, so check back to download the 2GB file if the queue is filled. And remember to always watch in FULL 1080 HD or you will have added scaling and moiré issues on some of the tests than what is already been added by Vimeo and our horrid bit-rate restrictions.</p>
<p>Background: This video compares the Blackmagic Design Cinema Camera and the Canon 5D Mark III in several tests. This includes dynamic range, sharpness, pushing levels, banding, artifacts, rolling shutter, chromakeying, wide/telephoto lengths, DOF (depth of field), low light, macro blocking, contrast, and more.</p>
<p>Thanks for watching. Hope this is as informative for you as it was for me making it.</p>
<p>Marco Solorio</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Source: [<a href="http://blog.planet5d.com/2012/09/the-blackmagic-cinema-camera-vs-canon-eos-5d-mark-iii/" target="_blank">Planet5D</a>] via [<a href="http://www.onerivermedia.com/blog/" target="_blank">OneRiver Media</a>]</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

  • Locked
RAW conversion for .NEF files??

Hi all,

I've been given some raw files that were shot with a Nikon to edit and process. As I'm a Canon shooter, I wanted to know if anyone knows what software would be best to view/edit these .NEF files?
I usually use DPP for all my canon RAW files, and have in the past also used Capture One and Adobe Camera RAW, but don't currently have either installed on my machine.

Any thoughts?

PS: I realise I would be better off posting this on a Nikon forum, but I don't really want to go through the process of creating a user account, configuring my profile, blablabla...

  • Locked
AF point comparison - D600 vs. 6D vs. 5D MkIII

For the record:

D600 - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dojoklo/8000274878/#sizes/m/in/photostream/

6D - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dojoklo/8001132878/#sizes/m/in/photostream/

5D MkIII - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dojoklo/7257199718/#sizes/m/in/photostream/

Please note that these are simulations and not real images (and that this is not my photostream!).

Shame about the 6D's AF system. If they'd built in four more points (above and below each of the outside points) and made them all cross type, this would have been a superb AF system for anyone that didn't need to track moving subjects. Looks like we're back to the bad old days.

Unless they can go very agressive on the price, I can see quite a few APS-C upgraders with crop lenses switching to Nikon. Or maybe not, the 60D seemed to be popular with new DSLR owners despite the D7000's spec sheet advantages.

  • Locked
A Quick Color & Noise Comparison: Canon EOS-1D X vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=11372"></g:plusone></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a class="tm_button" rel="&style=normal&b=2" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=11372"></a></div>
<strong>A big difference</strong>


A reader sent in a quick comparison between the Canon EOS-1D X and Canon EOS 5D Mark III showing a very different color rendition as well as a significant difference in noise performance at ISO 25,600.</p>
<p><strong>The Quick Test


</strong>The following test was conducted at sunset. This is the reason for the white balance setting, which on my 5d3 most closely approximated the warm tone of the light. Both files were dialed in at 8000k, +15 magenta. Both use the exact same lens, and were shot within 1 minute of each other. Both files are DNG 7.1, process version PV2012, and use the camera calibration setting “Camera Neutral.” All other settings including sharpening, noise reduction, tone curve, etc are all zero’d out for consistency. I’m using the latest version of Adobe Photoshop Lightroom available as of this writing, which is 4.1.</p>
<div id="attachment_11373" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 208px"><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/5d3-vs-1dx-no-NR1.jpeg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-11373" title="5d3-vs-1dx-no-NR1" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/5d3-vs-1dx-no-NR1-198x575.jpeg" alt="" width="198" height="575" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Test with 100% Crops | Click for Larger</p></div>
<p><strong>Canon EOS-1D X at <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/827036-REG/Canon_5253B002_EOS_1D_X_EOS_Digital.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H</a> | <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005Y3T1AI/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B005Y3T1AI&linkCode=as2&tag=canorumo-20" target="_blank">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/ICA1DX.html?kbid=64393" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | Canon EOS 5D Mark III at <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/886948-REG/Canon_EOS_5D_Mark_III.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H</a> | <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007FGYZFI/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B007FGYZFI&linkCode=as2&tag=canorumo-20" target="_blank">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/ICA5DM3.html?kbid=64393" target="_blank">Adorama</a></strong></p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://protogtech.com/cameras/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii-vs-eos-1d-x-low-light-high-iso/" target="_blank">PPT</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

  • Locked
Looking for an new Camera

I´m suffering from an broken 7D, as my bike crashed into an car this week and the camera case and the mirror were pulverized.

Now I am looking for an new Camera.
But I do not want to buy an 7D again. The 7D was fast, but mine was suffering from bad noise and moire.

I need an fast AF, as many AF-fields as the 7D, but with an better image quality.
I take photos from birds, my children and landscape. My son from jets and at car races.

1.6x crop factor would be prefered, but is not recommended (no must).

Waiting for an 7D II???

But will it appear in the near future???

Saving money for an 5DIII???

But I own some EF-S lenses (macro, wide angle, common zoom), also some L-lenses for FF.

What is your advice?
The 5DIII is very expensive for me, otherwise I would buy it. Or wait for an 7DII...?

G
Daniela

  • Locked
5D mark ii vs 50D center AF point sensitivity

So I was at a wedding rehearsal the other day. Super dark as always. I was testing out the lenses. I put the 70-200 is ii on my 50D and tried to focus on pew near the back of the sanctuary. The camera couldn't get an AF lock presumably due to the low light. I switched to my 5D mark ii body and tried focusing around the same area. The AF wasn't super fast but it did lock focus. This made me wonder, is the 5d's center AF point more sensitive in low light than the 50Ds? I know the 5d's gets bashed a lot but I'm trying to figure out what caused this. Not trying to start a flame war here but just curious if someone knows the actual sensitivity of the center AF point. Thanks.

  • Locked
Manual Focus Lenses: Smarter in F-Mount?

I was wondering, since we all know Nikon lenses can be mounted on Canon bodies but not viceversa, is it not smarter to buy manual-focus-only lenses always in Nikon mount and buy an adapter?

That would minimize the inconveniences of side-grading, and would make expensive lenses such as Zeiss, Voigtländer and Schneider-Kreuznach a very safe investment.

Is there any disadvantage I'm neglecting? Any problem with aperture control?

  • Locked
How are lenses measured?

Can anyone provide a simple explanation as to how the focal length of a lens is measured? Where is measured from? What makes a 17mm lens a 17mm lens? What makes a 400mm lens a 400mm lens. My initial thought was that if you held up a negative 400mm from your eye, you might get a similar angle of view to a 400mm lens. But that doesn't seem quite right, and doesn't account for fish eye lenses etc. A quick google search didn't shed much light. Does anyone know?

  • Locked
Tamron 24-70 Focus Accuracy

So just thought I'd share some findings that happily surprised me today. I have a wedding this Sunday and decided to to rent the Tamron 24-70. As always I setup Focal to calibrate AFMA all the rented lenses. I was surprised when it came time for the Tamron that it's focus accuracy was right around what I get with Canon's L zooms. The only other Tamron lens I've owned is the Tamron 17-50 which while a great lens has fairly large focus accuracy issues. For this reason I often use it at f/4. It also sharpens up nicely I've noticed vs 2.8. Anyways, attached are the Focal reports for both lenses on my 50D and the 24-70 on my 5D. We'll see how well it does Sunday but this definitely gives me a little more assurance than before.

Attachments

  • Locked
last call for vacation lenses

I got tons of good answers before, but meanwhile I added the sayang 14mm to the pack. Now, is no question it has to come along, along with the 80-200 2.8L.
That leaves a big gap in between, and I have no choice to carry a third lens for my vacation in Nepal.
So in sum:
CONFIRMED
- Samyang 14mm 2.8
- Canon 80-200mm 2.8L

OPTIONS for a third lens:
- Canon TSE 24mm 3.5LII
- Canon 35mm 1.4L
- Canon 17-40mm 4L

I will be shooting mostly landscape, people, maybe some night shots, and few days in city environment.
Weight is not an issue.
What would be your choice and why?
Thanks
Phil

  • Locked
5D Mark II eyepiece

So I've been noticing lately that it's hard for me to see the entire frame when looking through the eyepiece. If I push my eye against it really hard I can see all the way but it's very uncomfortable like that. As a result of this, a lot of my shots end up with more head room than I'd like. Has anybody ever had this issue? With the smaller mirror on my 50D I don't have this issue. I wasn't sure if there was something I could do that might help this some. I don't wear glasses FYI.

  • Locked
Who upgraded from 5d mk2 to mk3 ?

Hey...

Long time lurker,first time poster.

Have had d60, 10d ,1dmk2, 5d , 5d mk2

Gear is 35L , 85Lii, 100macro, 17-40L , 70-200mk2, and just this week a 24-70L mk2
And 600ex plus stert3, 2x550ex

Anyway,to the point- I've been sitting on the fence about jumping to mk3....
Have mk3 owners here generally upgraded from a mk2 or something older?
Since I now have mk2 of 24-70 and 70-200 plus new flash I'm thinking the mk3 would compliment my gear very well

I shoot mostly family stuff with a little concert photography as a sideline

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM

Pictures of Shuttle Endeavor on 9/21/2012 as it takes its victory lap over Los Angeles before final landing at LAX to begin grooming for a permanent place in the California Science Center. These shots were taken as the shuttle flew over NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab near Pasadena. Exciting sight as it flew overhead at 1500 ft! :)

Pictures taken with Canon 7D + Canon EF 70-300 f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM. Shuttle#1 is uncropped, taken at 300mm (480mm crop) at 1/400 sec, f/8, ISO 100. Shuttle#2 is cropped, with same exposure, except shutter speed was 1/640 sec. Both images shot in RAW using AI Servo and high-burst option.

Attachments

  • shuttle#1_overJPL_092112.jpg
    shuttle#1_overJPL_092112.jpg
    54.6 KB · Views: 2,111
  • shuttle#2_overJPL_092112.jpg
    shuttle#2_overJPL_092112.jpg
    127.3 KB · Views: 1,256

  • Locked
Blown-out Highligts in Stage Lighting

I have heard people complain about LED lights and excessive blown highlights, but I finally ran into a problem with it this week. Unfortunately it's on performers' faces. Here are 2 shots that were perfectly exposed for the subject but pretty much unusable in color because of the blown out faces. Dropping down the highlights in Lightroom made it look even worse. Converting to B&W makes it reasonable.

Both pics shot with a 5D3, 70-200 f/2.8II, ISO 3200, 1/100, f4.0, daylight wb. Straight conversion to jpeg with no other adjustments.

Attachments

  • GX5A1959.jpg
    GX5A1959.jpg
    202.5 KB · Views: 1,861
  • GX5A1966.jpg
    GX5A1966.jpg
    243.6 KB · Views: 1,806

  • Locked
First lenses for new crop sensor camera?

Hi all

I'll shortly be buying my first Canon DSLR. I shot just about everything with the exception of birds. I am tending toward the EFS 15-85mm and the EF 70-200 f4 as my first lenses to go with the 50mm f1.8 mk1 I have retained from my film bodies. Are these a good choice or would there be a better combination to cover a similar range?
Any thoughts appreciated!

  • Locked
Just got new 17-40 f/4L packed with "EF lens" CD

Just got my new 17-40 f/4L lens to add wide angle capability for my 5D3. Now I can go wider than the 24-105 f/4L kit lens. Looking forward to running AF MA tests to see how it performs.

A first for me: the 17-40 was packed with a "EF lens" CD that has PDFs of user's guides for all Canon EF lenses. Saves Canon from publishing handy booklet size guide that can be easily stashed in my camera bag. Lens User Guides don't always have much in-depth info, except for speciality lens, like macro, tilt, etc. With PDF substitute, not as convenient as booklet size I've gotten with my previous lens purchases. Another cost-savings move by Canon.

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,279
Messages
967,158
Members
24,636
Latest member
kapalabhati

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
353
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
982.4 MB