Behind the scenes with Canon CPS at the Paris Games

I hope they'll at least add pre-capture options (instead of always 20 shots) and maybe add the R3's 195fps burst option in. Those I feel should easily be possible in a firmware update. Even on the R3 the 195fps mode came in firmware.

With those as options it would be interesting if we can assign buttons to those functions to quickly turn them on and off while shooting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
I hope they'll at least add pre-capture options (instead of always 20 shots) and maybe add the R3's 195fps burst option in. Those I feel should easily be possible in a firmware update. Even on the R3 the 195fps mode came in firmware.

With those as options it would be interesting if we can assign buttons to those functions to quickly turn them on and off while shooting.
With the improvement in sensor readout performance 400fps should be possible, but that might run into bottlenecks elsewhere, like the RAM bandwidth.

The 40fps still seems low to me (from a technical standpoint), I really wonder if that is an actual technical limitation or if someone just said "640kb40fps is enough for everyone!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
With the improvement in sensor readout performance 400fps should be possible, but that might run into bottlenecks elsewhere, like the RAM bandwidth.

The 40fps still seems low to me (from a technical standpoint), I really wonder if that is an actual technical limitation or if someone just said "640kb40fps is enough for everyone!"
Baffles me too.

The new R5 can do 30fps X 45Mp = 1350MP a second

Yet the "Flagship" R1 can do 40fps X 24MP = 960MP a second

That's a 41% increase in throughput for the R5 II.

Equalising for the R1 - that would be a 56fps equivelent.

I know the buffers might be slightly different, but still....

Could Canon possiby increase the R1's fps to 60fps in firmware - seems like the hardware can take it.

Afterall, there's another 24MP camera out there that does 120fps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
With the improvement in sensor readout performance 400fps should be possible, but that might run into bottlenecks elsewhere, like the RAM bandwidth.

The 40fps still seems low to me (from a technical standpoint), I really wonder if that is an actual technical limitation or if someone just said "640kb40fps is enough for everyone!"
The buffer is the main limitation.
RAW + JPG is unlimited at 40 FPS.
They could raise it for JPG only shooters if they wanted to.
I use the high frame burst mode on my R3 so I would use it on the R1 but I do not miss that there is not one.
 
Upvote 0
I love seeing these shelves full of pro gear every time.
How I would love to stroll through there like a candy store, take everything I want and dady (or someone else) may pay for it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
The buffer is the main limitation.
RAW + JPG is unlimited at 40 FPS.
They could raise it for JPG only shooters if they wanted to.
I use the high frame burst mode on my R3 so I would use it on the R1 but I do not miss that there is not one.
That makes sense, limiting the framerate to get 'unlimited' shooting. As with most Canon things, I do wish they'd add the option to do more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0