Canon EOS R6 V Specs: Active Cooling and more…

[candyman]

I never thought about that.
I am guessing it will just be R6 Five.

Well, it will be 6 to 8 years before an R6 Mark V arrives (if)
R6 V will be 'old' by then.
More important: it is called R6 Mark V

 

[scyrene]

Well, it will be 6 to 8 years before an R6 Mark V arrives (if)
R6 V will be 'old' by then.
More important: it is called R6 Mark V

Also, has any Canon product ever reached mark V designation? Maybe one of the old 18-55 kit lenses?

 

[Canon Rumors]

I posted a minor spec update. At this point I'm more interested in the lens.

Canon EOS R6 V vs EOS C50: Everything We Know Ahead of the Official Launch

With the Canon EOS R6 V announcement just two weeks away, we dive into the latest spec leaks—including 7K 60P RAW internal recording, a cinema-inspired body, and how it compares to the EOS C50.

www.canonrumors.com

 

[Kjsheldo]

425g for the 20-50mm? NOW we're talking.

 

[Del Paso]

Manual and servo zoom?
Great!
425g?
Great!

 

[Mirnavi]

the lens looks big for 425grams or Idk if the camera is only small

 

[neuroanatomist]

the lens looks big for 425grams or Idk if the camera is only small

No EVF on the camera, it will be smaller.

 

[rombe3jr]

So this is exactly as the C50 with ibis? Im not seeing the difference except for ibis

I was wondering the same thing. But for $1,500 - $2,000 USD less +/- than the C50 it seems they will have to withhold some other features.

 

[ScreensMatter]

This 20-50 mm is shaping up to become a good replacement for my adapted EF 24-70mm f/4. If Canon gave us a screen mechanism like the S1 II I would never have to wonder if the grass is greener in FE or L-mount.

 

[P-visie]

I was wondering the same thing. But for $1,500 - $2,000 USD less +/- than the C50 it seems they will have to withhold some other features.

RTFM: This post has a list of differences with the C50:
https://www.canonrumors.com/forum/t...s-active-cooling-and-more….45117/post-1044672

 

[john1970]

According to the update the lens weighs in at 425 grams which is 15 oz or just shy of a pound. I am definitely buying this lens and taking it with me to AK instead of the 24-70 mm f2.8. I gain quite a bit on the wide end and save a pound of weight that I don't need to carry. The other two lenses will be a 70-200 mm f2.8 and 100-300 mm f2.8 with TCs.

 

[robotfist]

I am so confused by this naming convention. Does that mean there will be no R6 IV? It went from R6 III to R6 V? Or is the V just supposed to mean "Video" and not a roman number?

 

[neuroanatomist]

I am so confused by this naming convention. Does that mean there will be no R6 IV? It went from R6 III to R6 V? Or is the V just supposed to mean "Video" and not a roman number?

V = video. Like the R50 V. As pointed about above, the Roman numeral succession is formally Mark II, Mark III, etc. So R6 V is video, the R6 Mark V will come after the R6 Mark IV. There could be an R6 V Mark II, as well.

 

[roby17269]

Isn't it strange that, apart from Sony lovers, all other brand users behave in a civil and intelligent manner?
Nikon, Panasonic, Fuji etc... owners never seem to post unqualified or dishonest comments about competition.

It isn't strange at all because it isn't true.
There's plenty of stupidity and incivility on forums of all brands. Canon included

 

[Del Paso]

It isn't strange at all because it isn't true.
There's plenty of stupidity and incivility on forums of all brands. Canon included

How many Nikon, Panasonic, Fujifilm, Leica users having repeatedly posted crappy comments on CanonRumors can you quote?
Sony users lead by a huge margin. No idea why.
And I do not mean justified and deserved criticism, but invented statistics, technical untruths etc...

 

[tattwah]

Any information about this shutter type in this camera? are there mechanical shutter or electronic shutter only?

 

[padam]

Electronic shutter only.

 

[roby17269]

How many Nikon, Panasonic, Fujifilm, Leica users having repeatedly posted crappy comments on CanonRumors can you quote?
Sony users lead by a huge margin. No idea why.
And I do not mean justified and deserved criticism, but invented statistics, technical untruths etc...

If you meant only here on CR, maybe (although I have no idea which cameras everyone owns), but in general, I would disagree.
I spent years on DPR before they self-imploded and there was a rich selection of trolls of all provenances, even in rarefied places such as the medium format forum. And based on short lurkings on other forums, the situation seem to be the same across the board

 

[EOS 4 Life]

HDR

Even the R50 has HDR

 

[Del Paso]

If you meant only here on CR, maybe (although I have no idea which cameras everyone owns), but in general, I would disagree.
I spent years on DPR before they self-imploded and there was a rich selection of trolls of all provenances, even in rarefied places such as the medium format forum. And based on short lurkings on other forums, the situation seem to be the same across the board

Right, I meant on CR.
As to forums in general, I can certainly fully agree with you.