Canon EOS R6 V Specs: Active Cooling and more…

[candyman]

I never thought about that.
I am guessing it will just be R6 Five.

Well, it will be 6 to 8 years before an R6 Mark V arrives (if)
R6 V will be 'old' by then.
More important: it is called R6 Mark V

 

[scyrene]

Well, it will be 6 to 8 years before an R6 Mark V arrives (if)
R6 V will be 'old' by then.
More important: it is called R6 Mark V

Also, has any Canon product ever reached mark V designation? Maybe one of the old 18-55 kit lenses?

 

[Canon Rumors]

I posted a minor spec update. At this point I'm more interested in the lens.

Canon EOS R6 V vs EOS C50: Everything We Know Ahead of the Official Launch

With the Canon EOS R6 V announcement just two weeks away, we dive into the latest spec leaks—including 7K 60P RAW internal recording, a cinema-inspired body, and how it compares to the EOS C50.

www.canonrumors.com

 

[Kjsheldo]

425g for the 20-50mm? NOW we're talking.

 

[Del Paso]

Manual and servo zoom?
Great!
425g?
Great!

 

[Mirnavi]

the lens looks big for 425grams or Idk if the camera is only small

 

[neuroanatomist]

the lens looks big for 425grams or Idk if the camera is only small

No EVF on the camera, it will be smaller.

 

[rombe3jr]

So this is exactly as the C50 with ibis? Im not seeing the difference except for ibis

I was wondering the same thing. But for $1,500 - $2,000 USD less +/- than the C50 it seems they will have to withhold some other features.

 

[ScreensMatter]

This 20-50 mm is shaping up to become a good replacement for my adapted EF 24-70mm f/4. If Canon gave us a screen mechanism like the S1 II I would never have to wonder if the grass is greener in FE or L-mount.

 

[P-visie]

I was wondering the same thing. But for $1,500 - $2,000 USD less +/- than the C50 it seems they will have to withhold some other features.

RTFM: This post has a list of differences with the C50:
https://www.canonrumors.com/forum/t...s-active-cooling-and-more….45117/post-1044672

 

[john1970]

According to the update the lens weighs in at 425 grams which is 15 oz or just shy of a pound. I am definitely buying this lens and taking it with me to AK instead of the 24-70 mm f2.8. I gain quite a bit on the wide end and save a pound of weight that I don't need to carry. The other two lenses will be a 70-200 mm f2.8 and 100-300 mm f2.8 with TCs.

 

[robotfist]

I am so confused by this naming convention. Does that mean there will be no R6 IV? It went from R6 III to R6 V? Or is the V just supposed to mean "Video" and not a roman number?

 

[neuroanatomist]

I am so confused by this naming convention. Does that mean there will be no R6 IV? It went from R6 III to R6 V? Or is the V just supposed to mean "Video" and not a roman number?

V = video. Like the R50 V. As pointed about above, the Roman numeral succession is formally Mark II, Mark III, etc. So R6 V is video, the R6 Mark V will come after the R6 Mark IV. There could be an R6 V Mark II, as well.