In that case I think you have your answer!I don't mind paying for it. Sony 5.6 million resolution 240fps is a nice start
Well, at least it has some good stuff on the inside....unlike some people, who regardless of their appearance have just ugly shit on the inside.
Sony a7r iii has oneI wonder which company would give us high resolution fast EVF first. Hopefully Canon would do it right.
My experience somewhat mirrors yours but using the larger cameras. Of the 6D, 7D, 5D, 1Dc/1Dx, C100, C200, C300, C700 cameras we have here, my actual favorite is the 1D series because my hands are so large. Even the 5D series (mark 2 to mark 4) is too small for me. i NEED that large battery to feel comfortable shooting hockey, soccer (football), basketball and our industrial systems work. For the mirrorless cameras between the M50 and M5, I take the M50 because it "Feels Larger" to me in size over the M5. I have done a pro shoot on an M50 and I am VERY SURPRISED at just how good the 4K video running at 24 fps is when you use a decent 50 mm, 85mm or 135mm lens even when using a custom adapter! I personally like shooting everything MANUALLY where I do the focus, iris for primes and zooming if i'm on a zoom lens so the autofocus is not an issue I need to worry about.
I actually PREFER the image output of the M50 over the M5 as it SEEMS to give me sharper video footage. The rolling shutter issue is controllable by opening up the iris and changing your angles for action shots to mostly persons objects coming into me frontwards or directly away from me rather than side to side motion! After that, Blackmagic Resolve works WONDERS on the M50 4k video footage brightening, saturating and sharpening it to my heart's delight!
If your tool has limitations, you work WITHIN your tool's limitation or you use creative techniques to get AROUND the limitations. The M50 really doesn't have too many limitations other than more rolling shutter than my 5Dmk4/1Dc/1Dxmk2 cameras. Image quality is quite comparable if those limitations are taken into account during filming!
NOW....what I DO EXPECT from Canon is that it's new Mirrorless Full Frame camera will have some Stills and Video features (based upon my sources!) that are quite a bit more spectacular than many have surmised here. You're going to be getting a bit of a treat on about four common features coming very soon now. After that the NEXT Canon camera is where the BIG GUNS from Canon are coming out because THAT ONE is Medium Format and the REASON I KNOW that is because ANOTHER MF large sensor camera is coming out from a certain company at a certain time which will turn the Stills and Video industry UPSIDE DOWN with it's everything AND the kitchen sync feature set ;-) stuffed into a smallish kinda-XC15-like form factor but using a DCI 8K by 6K up-to-120 fps at FULL SIZE of the MF sensor and MF lenses allowing use of the many built-in interframe and intraframe RAW/444/422/420 codecs and many image frame sizes and aspect ratios WITHOUT having to buy extra licences!
REMEMBER! YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST !!!
It's an interesting thought. It would certainly keep the lens sizes down. But I'd be a little nervous about damaging exposed rear elements while mounting the lens.
Sony a7r iii has one
“R” actually stands for “Response to Nikon and Sony,” as in “we’re making a FF mirrorless because we have to.”
Right. “R” is the key.
It stands for 50 MP 20FPS 15 stop dynamic range with a universal shutter for about 2000 dollars.
It’s a secret code.
But there are a few future developments that could change my mind. 1) EVFs that exceed the Leica SL in clarity and Sony A9 in refresh rate, 2) extremely fast e-shutter readout speeds (1/400th second without banding/rolling shutter artifacts), and 3) next-gen DPAF system that imitates double cross-type phase detection in terms of acquisition speed.
Nikon is at Canon's heels already. Actually, Nikon have probably run over Canon already. At least they've released a new video with fragments of the new mirrorless. Just think about it, we don't even have an obscure video from Canon. No announcements, no video, no nothing. Not even reliable rumors. All we have is this 'R'.
While Nikon lovers are saving money for their new toy, we're digesting this 'R' here. C'mon Canon, R doesn't shoot photos!! What R you doing!!!
1) exceed by how much?
2) faster then 1/400 is probably a matter of time (maybe two generations), although rolling shutters will always roll.
3) boy, dual cross would require what, 9 diodes per photosite? At that point I imagine there would to too many cons to that trade. Incidentally does a dual cross help acquisiton speed per se, or merely increase the chances that there is something properly oriented to detect (and also add a second level of f-stop compatibility in a single location)? If they go with clocking of the pairs by 90 degrees in adjacent photosites, given that they’re ubiquitous throughout the frame, I suspect that would close the gap created by the diagonally oriented pairs in a dedicated PDAF unit.
What metric shows Nikon at Canon's heels? Technology? Sales? Satisfaction?Nikon is at Canon's heels already. Actually, Nikon have probably run over Canon already. At least they've released a new video with fragments of the new mirrorless. Just think about it, we don't even have an obscure video from Canon. No announcements, no video, no nothing. Not even reliable rumors. All we have is this 'R'.
While Nikon lovers are saving money for their new toy, we're digesting this 'R' here. C'mon Canon, R doesn't shoot photos!! What R you doing!!!
Don't project your opinion on other people. I personally like the look of Canon's recent M cameras. They look much better than the APS-C Sonys or the retro deaign cameras to me.
Even so, my 80D looks even better so going a bit thicker with the modern design of the M50 is going the right direction for me.
...because it could allow for new possibilities such as smaller light lenses, while still retain full EF compatibility thru an adapter. I'm not saying it would be the way to go, but it seems some people would not mind a new mount at all. I personally don't care much.