Because the price is reasonableSo why aren't we seeing Canon is doomed yet?
Jack
Upvote
0
Because the price is reasonableSo why aren't we seeing Canon is doomed yet?
Jack
So the 11-24 is blessed with a sweet solution to NDs.
Jack
So the 11-24 is blessed with a sweet solution to NDs.
Jack
I'd say so. I passed on the 6D2 and might reconsider on this one.Because the price is reasonable
Yes but not cheap and isn't this much more friendly?Sweet solution for CPL you mean. ND already had a rear slot-in filter, didn't it?
- A
Same. I bought a 6D instead because of the decreased dynamic range on the mark II, but will probably sell my 6D soon.I'd say so. I passed on the 6D2 and might reconsider on this one.
Jack
Yes but not cheap and isn't this much more friendly?
Jack
Sub-$2500 is a really good price. Hard to resist. It's put me in quite a hard spot at the moment. I love my 5D4, but I've wanted a tilty flippy for so long (macro, landscape), and I really don't need more than 2 bodies (a main and a backup). At this point, what are the advantages of the 5D4 over the R? It's a slow-burn, but I'm becoming enticed by the R.
Sub-$2500 is a really good price. Hard to resist. It's put me in quite a hard spot at the moment. I love my 5D4, but I've wanted a tilty flippy for so long (macro, landscape), and I really don't need more than 2 bodies (a main and a backup). At this point, what are the advantages of the 5D4 over the R? It's a slow-burn, but I'm becoming enticed by the R.
Sweet solution for CPL you mean. ND already had a rear slot-in filter, didn't it?
- A
No more need for a 6D III.
And once they bring the higher-end mirrorfree model, no more need for a 5D V.
'SLAPPER DOOM!![]()