I'm disappointed. I expected a flying pony. I'm switching to Samsung Galaxy.Absolutely. No ability to innovate either. Yes Canon is doomed better switch to that recycled a9II quick.
Upvote
0
I'm disappointed. I expected a flying pony. I'm switching to Samsung Galaxy.Absolutely. No ability to innovate either. Yes Canon is doomed better switch to that recycled a9II quick.
4k 10bit 4:2:2 with clog. If it's true, I can sell my 1dx ii and EOS R!
I realy hope it got a truely silent shutter. For weddings this is a big downer on the 1DX II, which is realy loud, even in "silent" modeThe article said 16fps mechanical and 20 with electronic.
Most times in weddings one can't hear thmeselves think, so I wonder how a problem it is anyway. All in all, it say it has elecronic shutter as well, so you can use that via the live-view and forget about the mirror clicking.I realy hope it got a truely silent shutter. For weddings this is a big downer on the 1DX II, which is realy loud, even in "silent" mode
the only thing in the way of raw video is storage and speed. i dont see how this would even be a hard thing to do today in a flagship. even the bmpcc 4k has raw I think.
Reminds me of...their associated EF lens line is effectively dead.
The one time I truly wished for a REAL silent mode was when, working for the orchestra, I got chased out of an auditiorium by a freaking classical-music lunatic. I don't think he heard anything, but just seeing a photographer dressed in black slowly making his way down to the railing of the nearly empty balcony sent this guy into an insane rage. I was brought before the theater manager and ordered to take some shots with my 5DIII in silent mode. He concluded I had disrupted the whole theater and I was tossed out on my gear-end.Most times in weddings one can't hear thmeselves think, so I wonder how a problem it is anyway. All in all, it say it has elecronic shutter as well, so you can use that via the live-view and forget about the mirror clicking.
I wonder if they will release any more EF lenses. I would imagine it will deal quite a heavy blow to sales figures of this and the 5D5 if their associated EF lens line is effectively dead. I understand they are probably aimed more at people who already own enough EF lenses but are not ready to jump into mirrorless rather than people starting from scratch, but still it would be a good idea to introduce a couple of updates on some of the older lens designs just to keep the EF mount alive until DSLRs get phased out for good.
I need a second R. Care to donate?4k 10bit 4:2:2 with clog. If it's true, I can sell my 1dx ii and EOS R!
Since I taken loads of crap on this forum for having the gall to suggest that Canon's autofocus system had room for improvement, I'm taking great delight in seeing that the one thing Canon emphasized above all else in this announcement was improvement to its autofocus system.
Well, I was once in a performance, and the anouncer said "no photogarphy during the show", and I wished I have life-view on that camera so I could just put in on my knee, use the 100-300 lens that I had at that time and just shoot un-noticed. many people used cellphones wihtout flash, and that was the ONLY time I envied cellphone photographers.The one time I truly wished for a REAL silent mode was when I got chased out of an auditiorium by a freaking classical-music lunatic. I don't think he heard anything, but just seeing a photographer dressed in black slowly making his way down to the railing of the nearly empty balcony sent this guy into an insane rage. I was brought before the theater manager and ordered to take some shots with my 5DIII in silent mode. He concluded I had disrupted the whole theater and I was tossed out on my gear-end.
I really wish I had taken a shot of the guy having a hissy fit. Or a swing at him. Ah, well, that was six years ago. Time to just put it behind me?
By the way, those phones had (still has) larger conncetivity range, and therefore, they are banned in a lot of countires now. Beside teh price tag of teh 1Dx3 I don't see any reason not to get one.
I was the orchestra's photographer!!!Well, I was once in a performance, and the anouncer said "no photogarphy during the show", and I wished I have life-view on that camera so I could just put in on my knee, use the 100-300 lens that I had at that time and just shoot un-noticed. many people used cellphones wihtout flash, and that was the ONLY time I envied cellphone photographers.
Both 1DXs had triple processors AFAIK.Please keep in mind that the latest 1D models always had a double DIGIC x configuration.
I don't see a reason to return to single processor design here.
So even more calculation power and throughput possible.