There is no point in changing the AA filter, it has been improved on the 1DX3 compared to its predecessor so why would they not use it, only the micro lenses need to be rearranged for mirrorless if they want to re-use it.OMFG, you for the 2nd time skipped right past my point. It was about the anti aliasing remember? That change makes it a different sensor. Reading comprehension gets really annoying when it takes multiple posts to convey a simple meaning.
But the point it, for some weird reason, you are arguing about something stated as a fact in the main article of this thread, similar MP count, different sensors.
While it is nice to dream about things but the reality that is is a completely different class camera and if they put a 1DX3 sensor variant in a mirrorless camera (with whatever type of AA filter), it will be named with either an X or a 1 and with a pricetag to match as well.
Hint: the 6D Mark 1 was still in production when the 1DX Mark II came out. They are both 20MP FF sensors, in fact the 5472x3648 pixel count is exactly the same on both cameras.
Are they related in any way besides being 20MP? Nope.
Upvote
0