Sorry sanj, on this one you are wrong. Cropping gives the same perspective just different dof. See my above example That I have posted many times.Nope.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Sorry sanj, on this one you are wrong. Cropping gives the same perspective just different dof. See my above example That I have posted many times.Nope.
If you want a different perspective you have to move. If you don’t move it is the same perspective irrespective of framing or focal length. If you move the perspective is different even if you don’t change focal length or anything else.In the context of where this stems from, I was referring to the inability to simulate telephoto effects from the same spot using only a wide angle lens. I gave the scenario of setting up a wide angle shot and using that for all your field of views. This means there are no variables. I'm not moving closer to the subject, not moving farther away. I'm not changing the focal length, not adjusting depth of field. The only variable is cropping with a single lens and a single camera. And no matter how much I crop, it will not look like a lens of a longer focal length.
So if I'm being creative, I would use different focal lengths to have a variety of shots because I would want different perspectives. I was merely illustrating that if I sacrifice some of that creative ability, I can get take advantage of the the flexibility and simplicity of using 8K.
In the context of where this stems from, I was referring to the inability to simulate telephoto effects from the same spot using only a wide angle lens. I gave the scenario of setting up a wide angle shot and using that for all your field of views. This means there are no variables. I'm not moving closer to the subject, not moving farther away. I'm not changing the focal length, not adjusting depth of field. The only variable is cropping with a single lens and a single camera. And no matter how much I crop, it will not look like a lens of a longer focal length.
So if I'm being creative, I would use different focal lengths to have a variety of shots because I would want different perspectives. I was merely illustrating that if I sacrifice some of that creative ability, I can get take advantage of the the flexibility and simplicity of using 8K.
And that is exactly my original point.If you want a different perspective you have to move. If you don’t move it is the same perspective irrespective of framing or focal length. If you move the perspective is different even if you don’t change focal length or anything else.
that is what perspective is, your position in relation to the scene.
THAT is completely incorrect. That is the bit that needs correcting as there is no such thing as a "telephoto effect".And that is exactly my original point.
"And you could incorporate all the dynamic panning and zooming so when you complete an edit, you could make it appear as if you had multiple cameras recording a single performance. Obviously, you wouldn't get the telephoto effect of a telephoto lens, or the parallax effect from tilting/panning, but those would be lost on the untrained eye."
Some of you feel like you have this need to correct something, when there's nothing to correct.
This is also why I also said, I'm just gonna agree.
Today is a great day, I preordered my R5, I have nothing more to argue about.
My mistake for saying "telephoto effect." But I do know that both examples look extremely different.THAT is completely incorrect. That is the bit that needs correcting as there is no such thing as a "telephoto effect".
Where is the 'telephoto effect' here?
View attachment 191255
The ONLY difference is dof, and that his because in that example I was trying to illustrate the dof too. If you use a crop factor on the dof the images are identical.My mistake for saying "telephoto effect." But I do know that both examples look extremely different.
Never disagreed with you at all.The ONLY difference is dof, and that his because in that example I was trying to illustrate the dof too. If you use a crop factor on the dof the images are identical.
Like this, 75mm or 150mm? It is the same thing from the same place.
View attachment 191256
Avoiding the off-topic discussions!Pre-order price is AUD$7,099 in Australia according to “canon.com.au“ website! Yes, this includes the 10% GST or federal sales tax of Australia. But, OMG... I am sure it’s worth every cent, but, goodness me, good luck finding both professionals and advanced amateurs with the cash to buy these in the COVID era!
Around AUD$5,499 to AUD$5,699 may have been a little more palatable! In a time where ‘pro-work’ is drying up, newspapers are shutting down and people are losing their jobs - these will not sell like hot cakes!
I ordered my R5 + 24-70mmf2.8L at 5AM this morning PST. Does anyone know if there is a way to find out where you are on the preorder list?
Cropping does not give the same effect. As someone who started years ago with 35mm and then transitioned to 2-1/4 x 2-1/4, the difference was amazing. When you crop you are blowing up a smaller number of pixels which does not return the sharpness of a long lens. The image may be the same size but the sharpness is completely different.
I'm just a bit ignorant about the demand for 8k I guess. I mean do we even have computers that we can process that much data on? Or screens to view it on? I would think 4k would be sufficient for most customers? And if they demand 4k recordings for an entire event then you'd likely not be looking at a camera system like this anyway?
I asked the same question. If you know what time you received a confirmation email, the shop should know if you were going to get a shipment by 30Jul. On the other hand, they probably won't tell us that we missed the cut because you would cancel. They like having your money in their bank account.
Never disagreed with you at all.
And it still makes my original point. I can't get the look of... what I should've said... "a different depth of field" if I'm shooting from the same spot with only one lens and without varying any settings.
Or then again, Canon is claiming an extra stop of DR over the 5DIV which, again, I'd be curious to see the output from.
1) Canon shows the GP-E2 as compatible with the EOS R5 under the "Supplies and Accessories" tab. https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/...dslr-and-mirrorless-cameras/mirrorless/eos-r51) Is the canon GPS receiver GP-E2 compatible with the R5?
2) Does the latest version of Lightroom Classic running on a PC correctly interpret the coordinates? Apparently it do not originally.