Pretty disappointing if true as this is the only mode without overheating
But it's only an opinion. A clickbaity one, at that. Do we have any reason to assume he knows something nobody else does?
Pretty disappointing if true as this is the only mode without overheating
But it's only an opinion. A clickbaity one, at that. Do we have any reason to assume he knows something nobody else does?
Fair enough, Tom - I don't know him from a hole in the ground, so I don't know how qualified he is to judge.He does super technical videos on youtube, have you seen them?
I trust him.
In which case my initial misgivings stand..!He is a sony fanboy. He lies a lot about canon. I blocked him a long time ago in youtube.
He is a sony fanboy. He lies a lot about canon. I blocked him a long time ago in youtube.
But it's only an opinion. A clickbaity one, at that. Do we have any reason to assume he knows something nobody else does?
And does it matter anyway? The results from the cameras look fantastic regardless of how it gets there.
Got to say that I'm more interested in "Real World" than contrived testing scenarios.He's got 1:1 crops for each and they show a pretty significant difference that didn't show up in DPR's 'real world' footage.
Got to say that I'm more interested in "Real World" than contrived testing scenarios.
For sure, but it'll take what I can get. His footage is a lot more interesting than the footage off *my* R5
It is not a bad video, seems fair.I don't know whether I want to crack open a beer and grab some popcorn before watching that... or just finally unfollow the northrups.
Standard 4K looks worst than 4K HQ of course. about the method that canon use in their standard 4K i think i would agree with gerald. there is little jaggies on the lighting pole which is a sign of line skipping. but its okay i guess, cause canon give us some alternative to work with.