A sincere question to all the experts here: How does this better R5 in video specs? (Except for the overheating issue). Thank you for any and all insights.
Upvote
0
No 29:59 time limit! Real (mini) XLR outputs, built in ND filters, waveforms, false colors, zebras and peaking. Higher DR. 4.2.0 files that are much easier to edit. Video record to both cards in whatever format you like, mirrored, proxies etc etc.A sincere question to all the experts here: How does this better R5 in video specs? (Except for the overheating issue). Thank you for any and all insights.
No 29:59 time limit! Real (mini) XLR outputs, built in ND filters, waveforms, false colors, zebras and peaking. Higher DR. 4.2.0 files that are much easier to edit. Video record to both cards in whatever format you like, mirrored, proxies etc etc.
They do, the way they measure them is different.If a movie camera can have 16+ stops of dynamic range, why can't a still camera? OTOH, I haven't seen much these days in the info about the R5 / R6 as to what their dynamic range is. What's with that?
Nonetheless, this also is a different type of sensor than what Canon has put in stills so far. DGO appears to have an actual hardware component that allows applying different gains simultaneously.They do, the way they measure them is different.
Video cameras are measure on an oscilloscope and the range is detectable signal irrespective of noise to full well capacity, in stills there is always a noise floor so the bottom gets cut off. For stills It is irrelevant if there is signal below the noise floor as you can’t see it, in video it is possible to see detail below the noise floor because of the nature of looking at so many frames a second.
I believe I saw December somewhere.
If a movie camera can have 16+ stops of dynamic range, why can't a still camera? OTOH, I haven't seen much these days in the info about the R5 / R6 as to what their dynamic range is. What's with that?
and they added a vertical filming function... wasnt the rule: dont film vertical?
Although Canon like to say they are different technologies the truth is the end result is very similar to the dual RAW possibilities with dual pixel for stills, though dual gain is more advanced. If more programs could deal with dual pixel double RAW images you’d see a 1 stop improvement in DR in many situations particularly if it was given a bit of refinement.Nonetheless, this also is a different type of sensor than what Canon has put in stills so far. DGO appears to have an actual hardware component that allows applying different gains simultaneously.
We may see an improvement in stills DR if they put it into a stills body.
Except that for now, it is only possible with 8.85MP as it heavily compromises sensor readout speed (it is twice as fast without DGO).Nonetheless, this also is a different type of sensor than what Canon has put in stills so far. DGO appears to have an actual hardware component that allows applying different gains simultaneously.
We may see an improvement in stills DR if they put it into a stills body.
Yes, before mobile phones and TikTok. The new Manfrotto Gimbal (which would match this camera nicely) has " Different modes: TikTok Portrait, Selfie, Inception, Time-lapse "... that's what people expect today....
Nonetheless, this also is a different type of sensor than what Canon has put in stills so far. DGO appears to have an actual hardware component that allows applying different gains simultaneously.
We may see an improvement in stills DR if they put it into a stills body.
No 29:59 time limit! Real (mini) XLR outputs, built in ND filters, waveforms, false colors, zebras and peaking. Higher DR. 4.2.0 files that are much easier to edit. Video record to both cards in whatever format you like, mirrored, proxies etc etc.