Well for that lens specifically, the size saving vs the RF version.What would be valid reasons to upgrade for those who already have something similar or even better like EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS USM, instead of using an adaptor ?
Upvote
0
Well for that lens specifically, the size saving vs the RF version.What would be valid reasons to upgrade for those who already have something similar or even better like EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS USM, instead of using an adaptor ?
I don't see the point of the "Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-7.1 IS USM". Given we already got a "Canon RF 100-500mm f4.5-7.1 L IS USM" which is faster at the wide end and faster at the tele end for the same focal length. The only thing I can think of is that it's smaller or lighter or significantly cheaper. If it was f/5.6 at 400mm then I could see some advantage to giving up the 100mm of reach.
Yeah - 10mm? Wow - just picked up the EF 11-24/4L for my EOS R - wonder how much that 10mm will be? The EF 11-24 is $2900The 10-24 and 100 Macro are mine
I suggested a couple months ago that I'd like to see this lens and that it was possible, and was told by a prominent member of this site that "no it's absolutely not possible". Now I can't remember who it was.
Autofocus tilt shifts are expected...
It has NOTHING to do with the 100-500 L lens. The 100-400mm 4.0-7.1 is an STM lens. It is an upgrade to the current EF 70-300mm Nano USM and will cost well below 1k.Why is there a 100-400 on this list when there is already a 100-500 out there? Does not make sense.
I suggested a couple months ago that I'd like to see this lens and that it was possible, and was told by a prominent member of this site that "no it's absolutely not possible". Now I can't remember who it was.
They can all rot there 2021 years If Canon doesn't add ALL-I to the R6 they won't see me using a mirrorless anytime soon. The 90D got crippled,.. Fool me once
I don't know why autofocus would be important in TS lenses. Maybe in some fringe uses, but I'd personally rather have TS lenses that focus manually and cost less, weigh less. It'll always be on a tripod the way I use them. Only speaking for myself.
And 14mm? Geeze.