There isn't that much difference https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Camera-Specifications.aspx?Camera=1446&CameraComp=1651 . The difference in thickness is due to a deeper grip but that doesn't make the camera any thicker once you put even a pancake lens on it, and the M6 II is much taller with the EVF attached. Maybe a more realistic M vs. R comparison would be this https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Camera-Specifications.aspx?CameraComp=1641&Camera=1523 . Mighty close there. In any of these cases (including the M100/M200), the lens is always the obstacle to pocketability, so the next step is a fixed lens camera with a collapsible lens. Ricoh/Pentax GR series comes to mind and there is a market there.For me that would only be attractive if there’s an M6II or M200 sized body to mount them on.
Last edited:
Upvote
0