it’s an excellent lens! Still hard to come by. They were in stock at Procam this morning, but sold out now. If you look, you can probably find one. The RF 10-20/4 has been out of stock at all the major retailers for a while now, but with some diligent Google searching I was able to find one at a small shop in Washington DC.At this moment, I care much more about the 24-105/2.8 release than another body![]()
For me, there are very few things that can be captured adequately at 60 FPS, but not at 20 FPS. Water droplets come to mind.60 fps is not 'meh'
The GS sensor is not a starting signal for Canon to produce new sensors. They develop new sensors all the time and I´m sure they at least have design studies for a GS sensor. Further, I didn't state Canon should put a GS sensor in the R5mkii (I don't think they should). I just mentioned that I can't imagine they won´t upgrade the sensor at all. A very obvious and wishful upgrade would be a stacked sensor imhoSony's GS sensor camera was announced in November. It is infeasible that Canon has developed and produced a new sensor since then.
The R5 sensor was a major breakthrough for Canon. In terms of sharpness, it competes with the Nikon D850/Z7 sensor despite having an AA-filter and the Nikon's not (I've compared both carefully). Despite have twice the number of pixels of the R6/R6II sensor, it is has only slightly slower readout despite pushing out twice the data, it has excellent DR and is pretty well isoinvariant and you can raise shadows 2 or 3-stops with no problem.Yeah, with the R3, R5, R6II/R8 Canon has basically closed the DR gap. All of those sensors are basically within a 3rd of a stop of each other, and way better than any of Nikon's FX DSLR line AND their Z line, and basically neck and neck if not better than anything coming out of Sony. The days of bashing Canon because their DR sucks relative to their competitors has largely been history for a while now, at least for their major pro products. I'm sure you can still find specific instances here and there, but if you're buying any camera with a sensor that has been designed and released since the R5, the DR is excellent.
I absolutely agree. 30 FPS on the R7 was a bit to much for me when photographing BIF or dogs in action. There are just so many pics that look identical. For me, 20 is more than sufficient and enough. If there should 60 FPS available, I´d for a possibility to customize the FPS, e.g. have setting of 10/ 20/ 30/ 40 etc FPS.For me, there are very few things that can be captured adequately at 60 FPS, but not at 20 FPS. Water droplets come to mind.
Going from 5 to 15 FPS can make a big difference in terms of wing position choice for a bird flight, for example, but going from 20 to 60 FPS just adds many more images to delete.
It's not as if Sony launching the A9III is the first time Canon has heard about Global Shutter sensors. They had a global shutter sensor in the C700 GS.Sony's GS sensor camera was announced in November. It is infeasible that Canon has developed and produced a new sensor since then.
Much better than a global shutter that comes with a lot of drawbacks, such as a substantial loss in dynamic range caused by effectively smaller pixel areas.No. Just eletronic line by line shutter that is fast enough.
What is a "global sensor"?Canon will be kicked out of 20 best selling cameras in Japan or globally in 2024 and onwards if R5 II comes without
This market is very competitive and brutal. Consumers will change lane if there has one better way to approach as simple as water follows gravity.
- A stacked sensor or
- A global sensor or
- Both
Don't insult your binI can finally throw my Sony a1 into the bin.
Don't insult your binjust a joke... I am pretty sure there will be Sony users who will be happy to get a used A1 for a decent price.
Of course, because as we all know, the best selling cameras in Japan and the world are mostly full frame with either a stacked sensor or a global shutter. At least, that’s true in whatever fantasy world you occupy.Canon will be kicked out of 20 best selling cameras in Japan or globally in 2024 and onwards if R5 II comes without
This market is very competitive and brutal. Consumers will change lane if there has one better way to approach as simple as water follows gravity.
- A stacked sensor or
- A global sensor or
- Both
I completely agree. I have an R5, R6, and R6II. I'm actually looking to unload the R6 and either get another R6II or maybe the R5II, but I'm leaning more towards the R6II as most of my paid work doesn't actually need all that resolution. 20MP of the R6 is a little light, 24MP is about right, and 45 is good for the relatively few instances where I need it, but everything else aside, the R6II is the every day paid work workhorse right now.The R5 sensor was a major breakthrough for Canon. In terms of sharpness, it competes with the Nikon D850/Z7 sensor despite having an AA-filter and the Nikon's not (I've compared both carefully). Despite have twice the number of pixels of the R6/R6II sensor, it is has only slightly slower readout despite pushing out twice the data, it has excellent DR and is pretty well isoinvariant and you can raise shadows 2 or 3-stops with no problem.