Yeah, but what's the "through image processing" bit about?
2x2 pixelbinning from the full sensor width and then scaling up to UHD
Upvote
0
Yeah, but what's the "through image processing" bit about?
So, if there's no 7DII upgrade and if this is the last of the SLRs, I would have to choose between getting one of these and never buying anything else, or selling most things I have an "upgrading" (actually downgrading) to mirrorless full-frame.
The 24-70/2.8IS for the R's interests me, as does the 24-240. But I'd have to have a body with around 60-100MP so in crop mode it would be similar to the 90D (83.2MP would be equal). And I'd have to resign myself to tolerating an EVF.
That's a lot of money to spend to get something I don't really want, but the alternative is being stuck with unsupported hardware lines (EF, EF-s and EOS SLRs).
What are you lacking right this moment that would make you buy a new body? Not trying to be snarky, just curious.
I guess no IBIS...looks nice otherwise....definitely kills the 7D2.
Why not a 5DIV as a second body? They compliment each other quite well it would seem.A second body, a higher-resolution sensor (for cropping when 600mm isn't enough), lower noise in the shadows and better video features.
Why not a 5DIV as a second body?
Makes sense. Here's hoping they put out something you can use.Because it has lower resolution (larger pixels) at the same focal length compared with my 7DII, much less the 90D. I'm often focal length limited even at 600mm.
I also have four crop-lenses (18-35/1.8, 10-18STM, 18-135nanoUSM, 55-250STM) and four full-frame lenses (8-15/4L, 50STM, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 150-600C).
The issue is the 90D may not have tracking, but instead fixed AF when shooting 10fps, so whatever your focus point/plane was when you started a burst, that is where the AF stays. The AF does not actively track the subject in between frames. For me this would be a no go.
To be fair, you can't really fit a large back dial in a body that also has a tilty-flippy. But from the picture it appears that they have enlarged it a bit. They have moved the groove you use to flip open the display to the top right, and it appears the display is also more flush with the rest of the back surface, which improves the ergonomics as well.
Because it has lower resolution (larger pixels) at the same focal length compared with my 7DII, much less the 90D. I'm often focal length limited even at 600mm.
I also have four crop-lenses (18-35/1.8, 10-18STM, 18-135nanoUSM, 55-250STM) and four full-frame lenses (8-15/4L, 50STM, 70-200/2.8L IS II, 150-600C).
Ha ha - Maybe it means they finally 'fixed' the AF. Now it works at 10fps? LOLA snip from the 90D video. Does the statement "During viewfinder shooting (AF fixed/tracking)" mean that when looking through the optical viewfinder and shooting at the high rate of 10 fps the AF is fixed; as in you have no AF available when shooting stills at 10fps? Please tell me I am reading this incorrectly.
A snip from the 90D video. Does the statement "During viewfinder shooting (AF fixed/tracking)" mean that when looking through the optical viewfinder and shooting at the high rate of 10 fps the AF is fixed; as in you have no AF available when shooting stills at 10fps? Please tell me I am reading this incorrectly.
for me it indicates fixed and tracking, that's usually what a "/" is for
Not sure I'd say universally and I'm pretty sure the RP isn't considered great, the 7d II wasn't great either, nor the 5d iv (from some users). Better than the sum of their parts is what you say when trying to find a reason to like something.And yet when people actually get to use Canon bodies, not just argue about spec sheets on the internet, they are almost universally considered great cameras and better than the sum of their parts.
Not sure I'd say universally and I'm pretty sure the RP isn't considered great, the 7d II wasn't great either, nor the 5d iv (from some users).