Yes, I know it's DPR review.
And yes, I know they kvetch prominently about no 24p.
But they do praise a lot of things.
The reason I posted this is that they make one assertion I found interesting...that out of all the EF-M lenses, only the 32 mm is good enough for the sensor. (Almost as if, they were planning for the new sensor when they (relatively recently) released the 32 mm...)
Anyhow, what do you all think about that statement? Is it bogus? If it ISN'T bogus, what does it mean for the future of EF-M lenses--are they going to come out with more of them? Or is this camera targeted for people willing to adapt EF lenses?
And yes, I know they kvetch prominently about no 24p.
But they do praise a lot of things.
The reason I posted this is that they make one assertion I found interesting...that out of all the EF-M lenses, only the 32 mm is good enough for the sensor. (Almost as if, they were planning for the new sensor when they (relatively recently) released the 32 mm...)
Anyhow, what do you all think about that statement? Is it bogus? If it ISN'T bogus, what does it mean for the future of EF-M lenses--are they going to come out with more of them? Or is this camera targeted for people willing to adapt EF lenses?