Estimate the price/body size of the new rumored Canon Megapixel Monster...

[DavidRiesenberg]

1D sized - $9999.

 

[DBCdp]

I'm looking at this in light of the way Canon has behaved in the past year. Super high MegaPixels, resolution and dynamic range a new high point....this points at the top professionals in the studio in high fashion and marketing. Those demands would want the larger, tougher, more stable 1D sized body. If the camera is going to compete with 30-40K MF camera's, they'll definately raise the bar on the price point to be a high standard for the Canon line while much lower than the competing MF line.

As much as I'd love it to be in the 5 series or such, and moderately affordable, I highly doubt Canon will see it that way. Premium camera will demand premium price point. Simple as that.

 

[Ricku]

I'm looking at this in light of the way Canon has behaved in the past year. Super high MegaPixels, resolution and dynamic range a new high point....this points at the top professionals in the studio in high fashion and marketing. Those demands would want the larger, tougher, more stable 1D sized body. If the camera is going to compete with 30-40K MF camera's, they'll definately raise the bar on the price point to be a high standard for the Canon line while much lower than the competing MF line.

As much as I'd love it to be in the 5 series or such, and moderately affordable, I highly doubt Canon will see it that way. Premium camera will demand premium price point. Simple as that.

That would take Canon's ignorance and stupidity to new heights.

Elephant in the room is the D800/D800e, which offers 36MP and high DR with pro features such as dual cards, top-of-the-line AF and full weather sealing. Basically, 1Ds-level features, updated to 2012 standards, for $3000.

I'd happily pay $4k for a camera that consisted of a great sensor and not much else (like the 5D2 was back in 2008), but I'm not sure too many others would - I doubt the difference between a 46MP sensor and the D800 sensor would be as great as the difference was between the 5D2 and D700 sensors.

Thing is: when Canon's high MP camera hit the street, the D800 will probably be down at $2500.

Good luck with your overprice Canon.

 

[Bob Howland]

"Estimate"? How about "make a wild guess" or "What I would do if I was head of Canon marketing"? Anyway, I guessed 5D3 body below $5000, simply because the Nikon D800 and D800 exist and the Sony 24Mpixel APS-C sensor can be scaled up to 60MP FF. I don't think Canon would introduce a high megapixel camera more expensive than the combined price of a D800 body and Nikon 24-70 and 70-200 lenses. But then, I'm often wrong about such things.

Update (correction): "...scaled up to 54MP FF."

 

[Loswr]

As long as it's cheaper than an 1D C... :-X

 

[Axilrod]

It's gonna be the 1000000000D (aka "the billion D"), and will have an MSRP of approximately $1,000,000,000. It will have 1,000,000,000 megapixels, 1,000,000,000 FPS, 1,000,000,000 AF points, and about 10 stops of dynamic range ;D.

 

[tiger82]

Canon cannot leave the D800 price point unprotected in a normal interpretation of the market. Dropping the price of the 5D3 to $3000 and putting a high MP body at $4000 is a lose-lose. Putting a high MP FF priced below the 5D3 is also counterproductive. Competition prices dictate the 5D3 pricing at $2500-2700 and a D800 competitor at $3000-3500. Or Canon can decide that any price point above $2500 is not entry level and is not typical of new DSLR buyers that they will price a high MP FF body at $5000 or maybe even drop the 1Dx to $4500-5000 and put the high MP FF at $7000. More likely is the new high MP camera will be aimed at super pros and studios which would put the price at $10,000+ leaving the rest of the line untouched

 

[tiger82]

It's gonna be the 1000000000D (aka "the billion D"), and will have an MSRP of approximately $1,000,000,000. It will have 1,000,000,000 megapixels, 1,000,000,000 FPS, 1,000,000,000 AF points, and about 10 stops of dynamic range ;D.

Perfect for shooting a thousand points of light

 

[extremeinstability]

If they want to sell as many lenses as they possibly can, which I'm sure they do, they're going to need something to beat the D800 back down. Guessing this has to be that camera, so 5D body, between $3500 and $4000. Or they feel they can get by with $4500. It seems it has to be priced against the D800 to take that whole deal back out of the picture for people. Not sure how that happens with the 5D III however. 5D III becomes $2700-$3000 cam and this one gets parked at $4500. Could see that. But does that still leave a D800 draw for folks. Kinda tricky for them. Or they just don't overly give a crap and figure most will stay tied to lenses and not jump to the D800 at that price, even if they stick this thing out there $5000 or greater. If it is to be priced high or mid-range it kinda has to bump into their own 5D III or 1Dx and if it doesn't outright come in around 5D III I don't know that it takes the D800 elephant out of the room. Maybe 5D III just has a real short life. Doubt that I guess given 4 years for the II.

 

[bdunbar79]

Um, the 1Ds line is GONE and is no more (hint: The 1D X).

I was referring to a 1D type body by 1Ds line, perhaps 1Dxs as NL suggests? (I know Keith is discredited for the inaccurate 1Ds mk 4 rumors but anyway)

Either case, my guess is 5D type high MP body to sit between 1 and 5 lines...

Cheers!

We can probably both agree that it will be a 1Ds Mark IV hidden in another name