SlydeR said:Got my shipping notification from B&H at lunchtime today...supposed to reach Miami on Friday. I pre-ordered almost 2 months ago ;D![]()
kayhikski said:SlydeR said:Got my shipping notification from B&H at lunchtime today...supposed to reach Miami on Friday. I pre-ordered almost 2 months ago ;D![]()
So B&H is shipping March orders? Would you mind confirming the exact order date?
Actually it would be handy if others could confirm their preorder date so people can track progress on the backlog.
I ordered on 4/1 so am still waiting patiently.
privatebydesign said:davidmurray said:I'm looking to buy a good video camera, and seriously considered buying a 1Dx2 for video work because it's a good stills camera and can do video.
Alas the bit depth of the resulting footage is the show-stopper for me - It's not able to produce broadcast quality footage, but for cheaper I can buy a video camera from Sony that produces broadcast quality and has many good features targeting someone with a multi-camera broadcast set up.
So why would I want to pay NZ$11,000 for non-broadcast-quality when I could pay NZ$7,000 for a good broadcast quality video camera and have cash left over for buying a 5D4?
For me 8bit video is too much of a compromise even tho' the colour compression is 4:2:2.
You wouldn't. But if you think a 1DX MkII is a video camera first that takes pictures too you are completely misunderstanding what the 1DX MkII is and who it is aimed at, hint, not you.
Besides, the 1DX MkII is very capable of broadcast quality capture, it might not have the specs you personally want or need, but we will see a lot of footage from them over the next few years vis broadcasting, and the one thing nobody will say is, "that footage is bad, if only it had been shot with more color depth!"
brianftpc said:You only want the 1Dx mk2 if you need 14fps.
davidmurray said:privatebydesign said:davidmurray said:I'm looking to buy a good video camera, and seriously considered buying a 1Dx2 for video work because it's a good stills camera and can do video.
Alas the bit depth of the resulting footage is the show-stopper for me - It's not able to produce broadcast quality footage, but for cheaper I can buy a video camera from Sony that produces broadcast quality and has many good features targeting someone with a multi-camera broadcast set up.
So why would I want to pay NZ$11,000 for non-broadcast-quality when I could pay NZ$7,000 for a good broadcast quality video camera and have cash left over for buying a 5D4?
For me 8bit video is too much of a compromise even tho' the colour compression is 4:2:2.
You wouldn't. But if you think a 1DX MkII is a video camera first that takes pictures too you are completely misunderstanding what the 1DX MkII is and who it is aimed at, hint, not you.
Besides, the 1DX MkII is very capable of broadcast quality capture, it might not have the specs you personally want or need, but we will see a lot of footage from them over the next few years vis broadcasting, and the one thing nobody will say is, "that footage is bad, if only it had been shot with more color depth!"
I don't think a 1DX2 is primarily a video camera. If I did I would not have described it as a good stills camera that "can do video. I would have described it as a video camera that "can be used for stills".
8bit video isn't broadcast quality, period. 8bit quality is what cheap n nasty monitors and inferior video cameras do.
Broadcast quality equipment for recording original production footage should generate at least 4:2:2 (but ideally 4:4:4), and use 12bit sample resolution. This is vital so that colour grading can be done in post production.
ahsanford said:brianftpc said:You only want the 1Dx mk2 if you need 14fps.
Or if you want the 1D feature set / customization / controls.
Or if you want better low light performance than anything else Canon sells.
Or if you want the best AF system Canon sells.
Or if you want an integrated vertical grip.
Or if you want the toughest rig Canon sells.
Or if you want a boatload more AF flexibility with teleconvertered lenses.
- A
Or if you're a rather affluent victim of the Gear Acquisition Syndrome. 8)scottkinfw said:ahsanford said:brianftpc said:You only want the 1Dx mk2 if you need 14fps.
Or if you want the 1D feature set / customization / controls.
Or if you want better low light performance than anything else Canon sells.
Or if you want the best AF system Canon sells.
Or if you want an integrated vertical grip.
Or if you want the toughest rig Canon sells.
Or if you want a boatload more AF flexibility with teleconvertered lenses.
- A
Or can't wait due to upcoming trip etc.
sek
davidmurray said:Broadcast quality equipment for recording original production footage should generate at least 4:2:2 (but ideally 4:4:4), and use 12bit sample resolution. This is vital so that colour grading can be done in post production.
kayhikski said:SlydeR said:Got my shipping notification from B&H at lunchtime today...supposed to reach Miami on Friday. I pre-ordered almost 2 months ago ;D![]()
So B&H is shipping March orders? Would you mind confirming the exact order date?
Actually it would be handy if others could confirm their preorder date so people can track progress on the backlog.
I ordered on 4/1 so am still waiting patiently.
SlydeR said:kayhikski said:SlydeR said:Got my shipping notification from B&H at lunchtime today...supposed to reach Miami on Friday. I pre-ordered almost 2 months ago ;D![]()
So B&H is shipping March orders? Would you mind confirming the exact order date?
Actually it would be handy if others could confirm their preorder date so people can track progress on the backlog.
I ordered on 4/1 so am still waiting patiently.
Ordered 03/10/2016
davidmurray said:privatebydesign said:davidmurray said:I'm looking to buy a good video camera, and seriously considered buying a 1Dx2 for video work because it's a good stills camera and can do video.
Alas the bit depth of the resulting footage is the show-stopper for me - It's not able to produce broadcast quality footage, but for cheaper I can buy a video camera from Sony that produces broadcast quality and has many good features targeting someone with a multi-camera broadcast set up.
So why would I want to pay NZ$11,000 for non-broadcast-quality when I could pay NZ$7,000 for a good broadcast quality video camera and have cash left over for buying a 5D4?
For me 8bit video is too much of a compromise even tho' the colour compression is 4:2:2.
You wouldn't. But if you think a 1DX MkII is a video camera first that takes pictures too you are completely misunderstanding what the 1DX MkII is and who it is aimed at, hint, not you.
Besides, the 1DX MkII is very capable of broadcast quality capture, it might not have the specs you personally want or need, but we will see a lot of footage from them over the next few years vis broadcasting, and the one thing nobody will say is, "that footage is bad, if only it had been shot with more color depth!"
I don't think a 1DX2 is primarily a video camera. If I did I would not have described it as a good stills camera that "can do video. I would have described it as a video camera that "can be used for stills".
8bit video isn't broadcast quality, period. 8bit quality is what cheap n nasty monitors and inferior video cameras do.
Broadcast quality equipment for recording original production footage should generate at least 4:2:2 (but ideally 4:4:4), and use 12bit sample resolution. This is vital so that colour grading can be done in post production.
ANDRXW said:Anyone notice and/or have information on the new kit added to B&H?
Showcases premium kit (card and reader) and an external harddrive.
Doesn't seem to showup on Canons site so I'm curious if its a reputable harddrive or not.