Thought I'd add my own experience to this matter. Here's a photo I took at midnight without moon and stars. First is the original frame, then there are the 20 stop pushs from 5DIII, 5DSR and the Sony a7RII.
I'm sure that everybody can clearly see that the 5DIII shows horrible banding, horizontal as well as vertical (and also some from one corner of the frame to the opposite one, albeit weak).
The 5DSR definitely has the edge over the 5DIII, proven by the fact that one can spot the bird in the center of the frame.
However, the a7RII just blows my mind. One can not only see that it's a common heron, but one can count each individual feather in its plumage (9876, by the way), and on top of that it's a piece of cake to identify the fish in its beak as a female trout, approximately 8 months old.
So, naturally the discussion about DR is done, as is CR, because now everybody has got to switch over to Sony. Apologies to CR and Canon for blowing the whistle and forcing you to shut down your business, but I just couldn't see scores of photographers following Canon like lemmings, and had to do something.
I'm sure that everybody can clearly see that the 5DIII shows horrible banding, horizontal as well as vertical (and also some from one corner of the frame to the opposite one, albeit weak).
The 5DSR definitely has the edge over the 5DIII, proven by the fact that one can spot the bird in the center of the frame.
However, the a7RII just blows my mind. One can not only see that it's a common heron, but one can count each individual feather in its plumage (9876, by the way), and on top of that it's a piece of cake to identify the fish in its beak as a female trout, approximately 8 months old.
So, naturally the discussion about DR is done, as is CR, because now everybody has got to switch over to Sony. Apologies to CR and Canon for blowing the whistle and forcing you to shut down your business, but I just couldn't see scores of photographers following Canon like lemmings, and had to do something.
