awinphoto said:Blaze said:Ivar said:Currently I fail to see any magic in this camera, just as usual Canon's crippled update, whereas the price seems to indicate premium qualities.
In that sense Nikon has clear and understandable distinction - full package in all FF cameras targeting different auditoriums, against Canon's very expensive and crippled expensive option.
What exactly do you think is crippled about this? These specs look much more appealing to me than the Nikon D800.
Exactly... granted it can still change up until it's release, but other than MP, what does the D800 have that the 5d3 (rumored) doesn't have that has been confirmed? ISO even wins (theoretically until tested) which is a first for canon.
Ivar said:Currently I fail to see any magic in this camera, just as usual Canon's crippled update, whereas the price seems to indicate premium qualities.
In that sense Nikon has clear and understandable distinction - full package in all FF cameras targeting different auditoriums, against Canon's very expensive and crippled expensive option.
TCull said:If this is true then I'll hold off for a new camera purchase until Christmas. This will be everything I've wanted, moving from a 350D to this will be a game changer for me![]()
Pretty much in the same situation here.plam_1980 said:I know I am repeating myself from earlier thread, but with these specs...
Tuggen said:nvsravank said:I am looking between 1DX and 5D mark III.
So looking to see what are the differences between the two. The ones i can see are
10. ISO difference - If the native is 1 stop lower on 5D Mark III, that means most probably the usable ISO is ISO 1600 and can go to ISO 3200/6400 in tough situations. For me coming from 5D, this is atleast 2 stop increase already for Mark III. And for the dance concerts i do take it is sufficient. There is enough lighting on the stage for me to be happy with a 2 stop increase. So professionally i am good. Personally higher ISO will allow me to take photos of parties etc without the flash and capture more of the ambience. So 1DX has an advantage - tiny bit only.
Anything else that is different. Anything else i need to consider?
The 5D3 will not be 2 stops better than 5D in high ISO performance.
Perhaps 1 stop. Perhaps even 1.5 stop as would be extremely good and better than D3s. Certainly not 2 stop.
Abraxx said:K-amps said:sublime LightWorks said:Couple of things......
1) Anyone notice the Digic 5+ in the specs?? <------ notice the "+" What's the "+" for compared to the two Digic 5's in the 1Dx?
The Powershots also have the Digic 5, but the 1Dx has Dual Digic 5+, the 5diii has single Digic 5+ I am happy for a single Digic processor for the main Camera (lets the magic lantern guys do some magic on the 5d3 as well, they could never on the dual digics of the 7d).
+1
The single chip could lead to very promising enhancements![]()
D.Sim said:Canihaspicture said:There seems to be a lot of fanboys in this thread... hardware wise how much better really do you feel this is than the 5D mark II besides the DIGIC 5 (which handles the high iso and framerate) and the small increase in MP by the sensor? If you pretend that this camera wasn't from Canon would you still feel the same way?
Not everyone wants megapixels.
I do!!! Canon needs a high MP cam for studio and wedding photographers. I want a 2 cam setup like Nikon shooters will now have with the D4 and D800. I was praying the 5DM3 would be in the 32-36mp range, very disappointing.
AlicoatePhotography said:What is Silent and low vibration modes? My guess is, it is related to the shutter, and the mirror being locked up. Maybe they have a silent electronic shutter option now. Or, it could be how IS and AF operate while in video mode. That would be pretty cool to have these act less violently when you are taking video.