5D Mark III Information [CR1]

Status
Not open for further replies.

Canon Rumors

Who Dey
Canon Rumors Premium
Jul 20, 2010
12,632
5,442
279,596
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
HTML:
<div id="fb_share_1" style="float: right; margin: 0 0px 0 10px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2011/11/5d-mark-iii-information-cr1/" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php">Share</a></div><div><script src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share" type="text/javascript"></script></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a class="tm_button" rel="&style=normal&b=2" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2011/11/5d-mark-iii-information-cr1/"></a></div>
<strong>5D Mark III Information?

</strong>It’s mentioned that a 5D Mark III will be aimed at “cleaning up” the DSLR video market. It will complement the 1 series video DSLR mentioned at the recent Hollywood Cinema EOS presentation.</p>
<p>The camera will be no more than 18mp. It was mentioned not to expect a big mp camera from Canon in the immediate future.</p>
<p><strong>Via: [<a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_5d3.html">NL</a>]</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
 
i personaly dont really mind more megapixels however seeing the lenses at the moment cant deliver enough detail for the 18+ mp sensors its a good point to stick to 18MP sensors for a year and perfect those.
maby if they find a way to imporve lenses further there is a point in adding more megapixels for this cheapass cropfreak.
 
Upvote 0
I find it interesting that in 2007 Canon developed a 50MP sensor, then a 120MP sensor in 2010, and in 2011 they seem to be saying fewer MP's are better. Why even work on multiple proof-of-concept sensors like that if the concept is inherently flawed? I think we are being fed some marketing lines (again).

In my film days I never shot higher than 800 ISO and more commonly shot 200 or less. I did, however, shoot 8x10 film partly out of a desire for higher resolution. Is the market really clamoring to shoot in a dark closet, or is that just the next Nikon rivalry now that Canon can make APS-H sensors with 120MP?

It is my hope that after developing the C300 and EOS C, that Canon will get back to making still cameras that focus on photographing stills.
 
Upvote 0
Hmm...not sure if the "cleaning up the DSLR video market" is encouraging for a 5Dm3 replacement or not. I primarily shoot still's, and while a reduce MP might be fine (as long as I get even better high ISO performance), if it's aimed more at video and less at stills (hello, we need a good auto-focus system!!!), than not sure I like the idea of it. Unless they introduce a new FF stills camera that maybe does some video as well.
 
Upvote 0
arussarts said:
Thank god I bought my "crappy" high-res 5d2!

haha ditto,

I really do want to see the real world quality of the high iso that will come from these new sensors though i know lots of people use 3200 on the 5D2 but I generally try to draw the line at 1600. realistically I will be suprised if they get 6400 to = current 1600 levels. 2 whole stops is a big ask but they will need to deliver that to keep everyone happy i think.
 
Upvote 0
It's going to be good to see what the 5DIII has to offer.

1. They must have sorted out the gripes with the AF.
2. Less MP than the 5DII but with a better sensor would be pretty awesome.
3. FPS, going to be way less than the 1DX (or even the 1DmkIV), but an improvement on the 5DmkII. Maybe about 5-6FPS?
4. Build quality, probably about the same, but maybe an upping on the estimated shutter life from 150'000 clicks to 250'000 clicks?

Basically it's going to have to be a bit better than the current 5DmkII, but not nearly as good as the 1DX so as not to cut into 1DX sales like the 5DmkII did to the 1DsmkIII.

Exciting times, wonder when the release will be though. With the big price drop in 5DmkII bodies it could be sooner than we anticipate.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.