prestonpalmer said:The engineers told the marketing team it's not a problem. The marketing people are not photographers. Whoops. Too bad all these armature photographers are way over their heads with the. 5d3
neuroanatomist said:"We will inspect your camera..." Translation: this is a non-issue. If you think it's an issue for you (i.e. you frequently shoot with the lens cap on), we'd be happy to keep your camera for a few days, then send it back with a little note that it's within spec and no adjustments are needed.
neuroanatomist said:"We will inspect your camera..." Translation: this is a non-issue. If you think it's an issue for you (i.e. you frequently shoot with the lens cap on), we'd be happy to keep your camera for a few days, then send it back with a little note that it's within spec and no adjustments are needed.
Better yet, don't rely on the in-built meter in conditions it wasn't designed for. None of the astrophotogs I know use the on-board meter; it simply won't deliver you what you want for that type of photography at those light levels.jrista said:I guess its worth mentioning if you do astrophotography and intend to have the top LCD on while exposing, you might want to send yours in for repair, or better yet, wait for Canon to release versions that have a fix. Better yet, forgo the 5D III, and pick up a 60Da for better IR/H-a sensitivity and greater magnification for less than half the price.![]()
Well said. This is exactly what Canon should do, given they made the error of acknowledging the issue as an issue in the first place.neuroanatomist said:"We will inspect your camera..." Translation: this is a non-issue. If you think it's an issue for you (i.e. you frequently shoot with the lens cap on), we'd be happy to keep your camera for a few days, then send it back with a little note that it's within spec and no adjustments are needed.
I wonder how many third party lens covers they have tested with? Not to forget the transparent lens cover from The Netherlands...neuroanatomist said:"We will inspect your camera..." Translation: this is a non-issue. If you think it's an issue for you (i.e. you frequently shoot with the lens cap on), we'd be happy to keep your camera for a few days, then send it back with a little note that it's within spec and no adjustments are needed.
Alternatively, these work great, too:rpt said:I wonder how many third party lens covers they have tested with? Not to forget the transparent lens cover from The Netherlands...neuroanatomist said:"We will inspect your camera..." Translation: this is a non-issue. If you think it's an issue for you (i.e. you frequently shoot with the lens cap on), we'd be happy to keep your camera for a few days, then send it back with a little note that it's within spec and no adjustments are needed.
Sorry all - could not help it. Just a joke...
swrightgfx said:Better yet, don't rely on the in-built meter in conditions it wasn't designed for. None of the astrophotogs I know use the on-board meter; it simply won't deliver you what you want for that type of photography at those light levels.jrista said:I guess its worth mentioning if you do astrophotography and intend to have the top LCD on while exposing, you might want to send yours in for repair, or better yet, wait for Canon to release versions that have a fix. Better yet, forgo the 5D III, and pick up a 60Da for better IR/H-a sensitivity and greater magnification for less than half the price.![]()