LOALTD said:Has a pool started to guess the final score?
I'll start, I guess: 84
ISO:1750
Colour Depth: 23.1
DR=12.4
Overall Score: 76
Based on scaling the 7DII out to 50MP
Upvote
0
LOALTD said:Has a pool started to guess the final score?
I'll start, I guess: 84
macVega said:I am a big fan of the aps-c sensor but in terms of image quality it can never match a full-frame sensor, bigger sensor collect more light than a smaller one.
jeffa4444 said:DXO scores are a laughing joke in the professional sensor and lens world if you want to know how to judge tests of lenses on cameras to maximise the performance read this article (yes its a machine vision site but the principle is exactly the same). Read the entire article and your quickly realise why DXO is a joke.
www.vision-systems.com/.../2009/03/matching-lenses-and-sensors.html
It does however highlight that as Canon use (as do Nikon, Sony et al) cameras with different pixel pitches the lens performance is NOT optimised for every camera.
RGF said:jeffa4444 said:DXO scores are a laughing joke in the professional sensor and lens world if you want to know how to judge tests of lenses on cameras to maximise the performance read this article (yes its a machine vision site but the principle is exactly the same). Read the entire article and your quickly realise why DXO is a joke.
www.vision-systems.com/.../2009/03/matching-lenses-and-sensors.html
It does however highlight that as Canon use (as do Nikon, Sony et al) cameras with different pixel pitches the lens performance is NOT optimised for every camera.
Tried to read the article and got a msg I don't have permission
meywd said:RGF said:jeffa4444 said:DXO scores are a laughing joke in the professional sensor and lens world if you want to know how to judge tests of lenses on cameras to maximise the performance read this article (yes its a machine vision site but the principle is exactly the same). Read the entire article and your quickly realise why DXO is a joke.
www.vision-systems.com/.../2009/03/matching-lenses-and-sensors.html
It does however highlight that as Canon use (as do Nikon, Sony et al) cameras with different pixel pitches the lens performance is NOT optimised for every camera.
Tried to read the article and got a msg I don't have permission
I think this is the same article http://www.vision-systems.com/articles/print/volume-14/issue-3/features/matching-lenses-and-sensors.html
ahsanford said:Ooooh. A big fancy pants DXO site redesign just dropped.
http://www.dxomark.com/
I wonder if that is set to coincide with a scathing review of the new 5Ds rigs? :
- A
ahsanford said:ahsanford said:Ooooh. A big fancy pants DXO site redesign just dropped.
http://www.dxomark.com/
I wonder if that is set to coincide with a scathing review of the new 5Ds rigs? :
- A
Oh, good gravy, it gets better. They are putting "overall rank" (i.e. of ALL cameras) on there, and you can sort it by their normal metrics of Portrait (color depth), Landscape (DR) and Sports (ISO):
http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras#brand=canon&price=0%2C45200&year=2011%2C2015&xDataType=year&yDataType=rankDxo
Filtering it on those metrics, two of Canon's top three dynamic range sensors are Powershots. I'll be brave and guess those two rigs have Sony sensors.
Overall, the 5D3 is the 39th best camera on the market, and the 1DX is 34th.
With rankings like that, DXO is as bullet proof as Sepp Blatter (for those following the goings on in Zurich right now). Awesome.
- A
KBStudio said:Interesting, DXOMark is offline! All access points get a server error message and a note to "Try Again".
Don Haines said:DXO is always right.... after all, they rate the 7D2 as superior to the 1DX in low light..... and the 50F1.8 is a much better lens than the 600F4.....