A New EF 800 f/5.6L IS II? [CR2]

[Canon Rumors]

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=11694"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=11694">Tweet</a></div>
<strong>In development?


</strong>I received a suggestion that Canon is currently developing a new EF 800 f/5.6L IS to take advantage of the new weight saving technologies in the newest supertelephoto lenses.</p>
<p>No mention of timeline, or if the EF 200 f/2L IS is also on the replacement cycle. If you remember, the 200 launched with the 800 back in January 2008.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

 

[Viggo]

Oh my!! I guess I'll have time to save up for it, before it hits the shelves in 2020 ;D

 

[Etienne]

How about these upgrades: a 135 f/2.0L IS, or a 200 f/2.8L IS ?

 

[untitled10]

How about these upgrades: a 135 f/2.0L IS, or a 200 f/2.8L IS ?

Would love to see the latter, still black with better iq the the 70-200 is ii maybe c;

 

[KyleSTL]

$15K? $20? The weight savings is probably one reason, but the change in the white paint is probably a driving force, too. C'mon, who wants big, expensive lenses that don't match in color, right?

 

[Loswr]

Gonna be an expensive beast! Let me guess...development announcement in 2013, announced launch in 2014, actual launch in late 2015.

Start saving now...

 

[Viggo]

The current 800 is $20300 here already, the new one will be seriously expensive...

 

[Daniel Flather]

Too soon. The 400/5.6 and 300/4 are in a need of a refresh for marketing.

 

[drjlo]

<div name=\"googleone_share_1\" style=\"position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;\"><glusone size=\"tall\" count=\"1\" href=\"http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=11694\"></glusone></div><div style=\"float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;\"><a href=\"https://twitter.com/share\" class=\"twitter-share-button\" data-count=\"vertical\" data-url=\"http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=11694\">Tweet</a></div>
<strong>In development?



</strong> the EF 200 f/2L IS is also on the replacement cycle. If you remember, the 200 launched with the 800 back in January 2008.</p>
<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">c</span>r</strong></p>

I sure hope 200 f/2L gets a replacement soon, so that I can finally pick it up at a decent price!

 

[Loswr]

I sure hope 200 f/2L gets a replacement soon, so that I can finally pick it up at a decent price!

Recent history suggests you should buy it now. For the 70-200 II, 24-70 II, and the 300-600 II lenses, prices of the MkI went UP when the new lens came out...

 

[PackLight]

I hope they do a better job with this lens than they did with the 500mm f/4 II and 600mm f/4 II.

 

[KitsVancouver]

I'm surprised they would replace the 200mm f/2 so quickly. I thought it was only a few years old.

 

[tron]

Oh my!! I guess I'll have time to save up for it, before it hits the shelves in 2020 ;D

;D

 

[Ellen Schmidtee]

Why would Canon invest in updating a supertele such a short time after it's release?

It sells enough copies (times enough profit) to justify an investment? The new Nikon 800mm f/5.6 is set to steal that many sales?

 

[Drizzt321]

I'm surprised they would replace the 200mm f/2 so quickly. I thought it was only a few years old.

As Neuro pointed out, it'll probably be 2014/2015 before we actually get any of these lenses up for sale, although it could be even later. That doesn't even talk about serious volume, just a trickle of the lenses into the hands of retailers.

 

[Marsu42]

I hope they do a better job with this lens than they did with the 500mm f/4 II and 600mm f/4 II.

What's wrong with these? You're selling yours for a cheap price ?

Start saving now...

Which probably is the reason why Canon won't release any further aps-h bodies (yes-I-know-it-sounds-like-conspiracy-theory-but-to-me-its-more-like-clever-business) :->

 

[altenae]

I hope they do a better job with this lens than they did with the 500mm f/4 II and 600mm f/4 II.

???????
Please explain.
I am very very happy with this lens.
It's awesome.

Or do you mean the delivery time after announcement.
Edward

 

[PackLight]

I hope they do a better job with this lens than they did with the 500mm f/4 II and 600mm f/4 II.

What's wrong with these? You're selling yours for a cheap price ?

What? I didn't say anything was wrong with the 500mm f/4 II or the 600mm f/4 II (except the price of course).

I said I hope Canon does a better job. For instance make it lighter, an 8 stop IS (is it possible), or could it even have better optics.

 

[PackLight]

I hope they do a better job with this lens than they did with the 500mm f/4 II and 600mm f/4 II.

???????
Please explain.
I am very very happy with this lens.
It's awesome.

Or do you mean the delivery time after announcement.
Edward

You mean improve on the delivery time of the 200-400mm? Lets hope.

 

[Marsu42]

an 8 stop IS

My vote goes to a 10-stop IS :-> ... but I'd really like to know if there are any absolute mechanical or physical limitations to IS, too - Dr. Neuro please?