• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Advice request: 20mm options

slclick said:
When I hear 20mm I think dearly to my brief stint with the Voigtlander Color Skopar. I wanted to love that solidly built little pancake but those edges....After the 40 and it's well deserved success I was hopeful for another 20 from ANYONE but there's been just pickle jars.

That is too bad you didn't like it. I love my little 20mm Voigtlander. It is just so compact It's hard not to toss it in the bag. I know it gets just murdered for it's softness in the corners, but in real world usage I've been more than happy with this lens. Something about it's rendering I really enjoy.

It was one of two lenses I took on a trip last year (Sigma 35mm Art was the other) and I just got back from a "fun" trip (aka photography was NOT important) to Punta Cana and to travel light I packed the Voigtlander, the shorty-forty, 85mm f/1.8, and a Fuji with the 23mm f/2.
 
Upvote 0
You're probably not hearing from too many Canon 20mm users because it's not very good. I bought the Canon 20mm f2.8 years ago when I was shooting film. It was never a great performer and if I needed really sharp images I'd rent a Canon 16-35mm f2.8 zoom from a local store in Manhattan. When I moved to digital I sold the 20, as I couldn't live with the sub-par image quality.
 
Upvote 0
Luds34 said:
slclick said:
When I hear 20mm I think dearly to my brief stint with the Voigtlander Color Skopar. I wanted to love that solidly built little pancake but those edges....After the 40 and it's well deserved success I was hopeful for another 20 from ANYONE but there's been just pickle jars.

That is too bad you didn't like it. I love my little 20mm Voigtlander. It is just so compact It's hard not to toss it in the bag. I know it gets just murdered for it's softness in the corners, but in real world usage I've been more than happy with this lens. Something about it's rendering I really enjoy.

It was one of two lenses I took on a trip last year (Sigma 35mm Art was the other) and I just got back from a "fun" trip (aka photography was NOT important) to Punta Cana and to travel light I packed the Voigtlander, the shorty-forty, 85mm f/1.8, and a Fuji with the 23mm f/2.

The soft corners were real world soft corners. I'm not talking forum pundits and brick wall shots. Funny thing, I took it to the Dominican Rep as well. My 135 was my most used lens.
 
Upvote 0
I use the sigma 20mm 1.4 Art a significant amount for low light band shots on a crop (80D) camera body. The results a really good.

- not much distortion if you line up your planes, however I do have a crop so I am not likely pushing it as hard.
- its very sharp
- its not the fastest focusing in low light, but it is good enough to take moving band pictures at 1.4 in pubs....
- its heavy
- the front glass is curved and has a permanent lens cap. This limits the use of an ND or other type filters
- because the glass is curved sometimes you get flare depending on light source. It isn't often, but it is there.

just thinking re: distortion, I have to be very close to people to take their pictures... while not linear like architecture, distortion would give odd body shapes and I don't see that occurring, so seems well controlled.
 
Upvote 0