I had several film cameras that had the same colour scheme....What makes it ugly?
I have a Nikon F Photomic that is silver and black, not a peep on how ugly or non-professional it looked.
Ooh! Nailed it!!!Two images for thought/reference:
View attachment 187862
Unfinished 1D X MkII body
View attachment 187863
My 1D X MkII with 100-400 II
Intentionally ordered my Olympus OM-D E5 Mark II in silver and black. I like the retro look.I had several film cameras that had the same colour scheme....
If you check her Instagram, it's pretty clear this and the 5DIV are cameras they had someone customize for themselves. Not Canon jobs.I had several film cameras that had the same colour scheme....
What is a 1Dx? Do you mean a 1D X? Or possibly a 1D X Mark II?I think it is an unpainted 1Dx with 100-400II. Why are we debating about the lens, when the topic is about camera body
The iTR in the 1dx was already an image sensor, they just expanded it to 10MP. So no transflective mirror needed, only a real mirrorIf that was mentioned before ... just skip to next post
On Canons german web site (https://www.canon.de/cameras/eos-1d-x-mark-iii/)
are some details about the upcoming 1Dx m iii (itislooks more Darth Vader than storm trooper):
AF
- 28-times resolution (maybe some DPAFish new sensor fed by partially transflective mirror with own DIGIC 8 processor, why not take some Super 35 lower res sensor doing the AF?)
[..]
I first thought that would be BS since the prototype wouldn't have label "Mark III" to help keep it secret.Here's the real deal...
We need to ask this man questions! Theres also another user if you search the hashtaghttp://instagr.am/p/B5c91FkFkJf/ Frits is one of the canon tester for the F1...two weeks ago in Abu Dhabi.
Agreed. I don't like the illuminated buttons, and hopefully I can turn them off. I understand some like them.It will be nice to see how well the illuminated buttons are accepted or not. There were a lot of people on this forum against such an idea on any camera not long ago saying a real pro would have no need because it is all memorized. Of course, that neglects the fact that more than just professionals buy these beasts. Personally, I'd like it if a future R had illuminated buttons.
No one should be complaining since you will be able to turn it off and on, possibly even with a dimmer control. THis is hardly an issue.It will be nice to see how well the illuminated buttons are accepted or not. There were a lot of people on this forum against such an idea on any camera not long ago saying a real pro would have no need because it is all memorized. Of course, that neglects the fact that more than just professionals buy these beasts. Personally, I'd like it if a future R had illuminated buttons.
Yes....abu dhabi f1 race.Nice shot! Abu Dhabi F1?
iTR uses information from both the dedicated PDAF sensor and the RGB+IR light meter that is effectively a small imaging sensor. The color imaging sensor provides color information used to help determine which AF point(s) are active on the PDAF sensor, which is still what provides distance information.The iTR in the 1dx was already an image sensor, they just expanded it to 10MP. So no transflective mirror needed, only a real mirror![]()
Considering Canon has already released an "in development" announcement that reveals far more, how would this be a violation of any NDA agreement?NDA be damned?
idk that's why I included a question mark due to my inexperience with the documents.I'm always open to being informed by others in the know, seems like you are 'in the know'.Considering Canon has already released an "in development" announcement that reveals far more, how would this be a violation of any NDA agreement?
Canon EOS-1D X Mark III - Cameras - Canon UK
Pursue Perfection with the EOS-1D X Mark III - Canon's most advanced DSLR ever.www.canon.co.uk