Mikehit said:
I don't think they'd put all the development work into a new model just to give it a touch screen and wifi especially as (in your own words) it would be 'a bit more future proofed'. If they are getting a MkIII then development will already be well advanced now and rushing something to market just for those enhancements would be a distraction. It is not a simple case of 'while we develop the full 7D3 we'll just throw out 7D2 MkII to keep the punters happy' - it is a major undertaking.
A new sensor, faster drive, integrating new Digic processors, 4K, just any *one* of those would be a major undertaking but I'm not asking for any of those in a "7D2+". Just that Canon-staple 3" 1.04M-dot touchscreen that has for a years been on all their other APS-C bodies except the top-end 7D2 and bottom-end 1200D/1300D. Plus throw in built-in wi-fi too, but the touchscreen foremost.
Mikehit said:
The reason 80D has a touch/pinch screen and the 7D2 does not is that the 80D was released about 18 months later.
The earlier 70D already had a touchscreen, released over a year before the 7D2. The entry-level SL1/100D and the t5i/700D were also released a year before and likewise came with touchscreens.
Now that the 5D4 has come with a touchscreen, Canon's engineers are out of excuses that they can't put a touchscreen in a weather-sealed body in 2017.
Mikehit said:
If lack of a touch screen and wifi are the only thing wrong with the 7D2 it must be a bloody good camera.
Oh yes, it is bloody good. Just with two annoyingly small but noticeable omissions, which if addressed would make it fully current as Canon's top-end crop body for the expected next couple more years while it's developing a Mark III.
Maybe a 7D Mark "II+" (again, not a full Mark III) patch upgrade in 2017 isn't so far-fetched as I now recall Canon when it made the change from the 650D to 700D, the biggest thing it added really was a touchscreen.