BG-e11 Hand Grip Gripe

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did anybody jump on the pre-order for the BG-E11? I wouldn't think there would be any shortage of battery grips since out of all the photographers I know, most do not use grips on their 5DmkII. Well that sample group of shooters may not be accurate in relationship to the rest of the world and it's hard to say whether there may be a shortage since unlike the mkII's release, the mkIII has hit retailers in large quantities.
 
Upvote 0
I find the smaller size of the 5D MK II to be one of the benefits, but for those who take lots of portrait oriented images, that will not be the case. In the past, I've had to remove grips when mounting the body on a tripod, because I could not keep the body still, even with a ordinary non-telephoto lens.

It sounds like the new grip will be sturdier.
 
Upvote 0
I wish they'd take a cue from Sony, of all companies, and design a grip with the shutter release in the same position as the horizontal release. Putting the release on the corner, as Canon does, means shifting my grip to a less stable stance. I love the design of the Sony/Minoltas.

2171975241_bc1c7d6661.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
In the past, I've had to remove grips when mounting the body on a tripod, because I could not keep the body still, even with a ordinary non-telephoto lens.

It sounds like you have a weak tripod or head.
I always keep my grip on and with a 200 lens there is no problem mounting the tripod on the grip.
 
Upvote 0
iso79 said:
I was just at BIC Camera in Shinjuku Japan. They told me the official release date for the grip is April 25th.

I pre-ordered my grip at a Dutch store; this week I received an email from the store in which they told me the grip would be available on July 30th, 2012!!! :(

Having used a 1D for 4.5 years now, the 5D really feels 'not complete' without the grip, so I'm hoping I can pick up a grip from outside the Netherlands as I have a nice trip planned to South Africa... in July! :)
 
Upvote 0
I didn't mind paying extra money for the 5D MK lll, but you won't see me in line for the new, high-priced Canon grip. Nope, not a chance. I'm waiting for the Zeikos version. The one I purchased for my MK ll was under $60, and identical to the expensive Canon grip.
 
Upvote 0
rlarsen said:
I didn't mind paying extra money for the 5D MK lll, but you won't see me in line for the new, high-priced Canon grip. Nope, not a chance. I'm waiting for the Zeikos version. The one I purchased for my MK ll was under $60, and identical to the expensive Canon grip.

Is it weather sealed?
 
Upvote 0
Stephen Melvin said:
I wish they'd take a cue from Sony, of all companies, and design a grip with the shutter release in the same position as the horizontal release. Putting the release on the corner, as Canon does, means shifting my grip to a less stable stance. I love the design of the Sony/Minoltas.

2171975241_bc1c7d6661.jpg

Great point Steven...if you have a heavy lens (or even if not) this alters the center of balance and always feels a bit funny as a result.

But since it's baked-in to their 1 series bodies they aren't going to admit error via a battery grip. Maybe a knockoff grip will come out like this though and we can have it that way.
 
Upvote 0
What will you be shooting when you go?

I'm headed to the Serengeti in August, and hope to have a 5DIII for the trip.

sek


markko said:
iso79 said:
I was just at BIC Camera in Shinjuku Japan. They told me the official release date for the grip is April 25th.

I pre-ordered my grip at a Dutch store; this week I received an email from the store in which they told me the grip would be available on July 30th, 2012!!! :(

Having used a 1D for 4.5 years now, the 5D really feels 'not complete' without the grip, so I'm hoping I can pick up a grip from outside the Netherlands as I have a nice trip planned to South Africa... in July! :)
 
Upvote 0
iso79 said:
I was just at BIC Camera in Shinjuku Japan. They told me the official release date for the grip is April 25th.
I hope your info is correct but i have a mountain bike race i wanted to test the 5dm3 on and just wanted the battery life. When i shoot weddings i wont have the grip on, the lighter the better when carrying camera gear all day. I dont really need it but it would be a convenience.
Also as far as knockoffs go i'll stick to Canons likely more waterproofed version with the new rubbery grip feel that the body has. I want it all to match up. Maybe they want to hold off on the battery grips release to get people who need the grip buying the 1dx lol.
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
Bosman said:
Maybe they want to hold off on the battery grips release to get people who need the grip buying the 1dx lol.

For that to be true, the 1D X would have to actually be available... :P
Haha i know but dont you think they planned to have it available but something keeps pushing it back???
I wish i could have a 1dx like some on this forum, drool worthy!
 
Upvote 0
thure1982 said:
Mt Spokane Photography said:
In the past, I've had to remove grips when mounting the body on a tripod, because I could not keep the body still, even with a ordinary non-telephoto lens.

It sounds like you have a weak tripod or head.
I always keep my grip on and with a 200 lens there is no problem mounting the tripod on the grip.


I have a good extra heavy set of legs, and a heavy duty Kirk Head, and a Wimberly Head.

I have had Canon branded battery grips Starting with my D30, 300D, 10D, XT, 20D, 30D, XTi, 40D, and finally gave up and did not get one with my 5D MK II. By then, I also had a 1D MK II and then a 1D MK III.

All the Canon Grips were flexible and poorly attached. No way to keep them from moving. Of course, with my same tripod and Wimberly head, my Canon 600mmL / 1D MK III was rock solid.
 
Upvote 0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
All the Canon Grips were flexible and poorly attached. No way to keep them from moving. Of course, with my same tripod and Wimberly head, my Canon 600mmL / 1D MK III was rock solid.

But the Wimberly head is made for super-long lenses and is to be attached on the lens for balance. Of course it's solid.
My 40D never had issues with the original grip and the heavy 70-200/2,8 is usm that i had back then.
Are the third party grips better then?
 
Upvote 0
thure1982 said:
Mt Spokane Photography said:
All the Canon Grips were flexible and poorly attached. No way to keep them from moving. Of course, with my same tripod and Wimberly head, my Canon 600mmL / 1D MK III was rock solid.

But the Wimberly head is made for super-long lenses and is to be attached on the lens for balance. Of course it's solid.
My 40D never had issues with the original grip and the heavy 70-200/2,8 is usm that i had back then.
Are the third party grips better then?
I was thinking the same thing, no one screws the bottom of their camera into a monopod or a head if their lens outweighs the body. I just dont get the point since the logic doesn't add up.
 
Upvote 0
The point is that there is flex between body and grip. Try holding the body+lens firmly in one hand and moving the grip with the other and you'll feel it. That flex is a source of vibration when a gripped body is mounted on a tripod.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.