Where the heck is this thing?? You can't even find it on Canon USA's site unless you go to accessories in the 5dm III page. I wish it came with a battery so between the 5dm3 and the grip you are covered.
Bosman said:Where the heck is this thing?? You can't even find it on Canon USA's site unless you go to accessories in the 5dm III page. I wish it came with a battery so between the 5dm3 and the grip you are covered.
Mt Spokane Photography said:In the past, I've had to remove grips when mounting the body on a tripod, because I could not keep the body still, even with a ordinary non-telephoto lens.
iso79 said:I was just at BIC Camera in Shinjuku Japan. They told me the official release date for the grip is April 25th.
rlarsen said:I didn't mind paying extra money for the 5D MK lll, but you won't see me in line for the new, high-priced Canon grip. Nope, not a chance. I'm waiting for the Zeikos version. The one I purchased for my MK ll was under $60, and identical to the expensive Canon grip.
Stephen Melvin said:I wish they'd take a cue from Sony, of all companies, and design a grip with the shutter release in the same position as the horizontal release. Putting the release on the corner, as Canon does, means shifting my grip to a less stable stance. I love the design of the Sony/Minoltas.
![]()
markko said:iso79 said:I was just at BIC Camera in Shinjuku Japan. They told me the official release date for the grip is April 25th.
I pre-ordered my grip at a Dutch store; this week I received an email from the store in which they told me the grip would be available on July 30th, 2012!!!
Having used a 1D for 4.5 years now, the 5D really feels 'not complete' without the grip, so I'm hoping I can pick up a grip from outside the Netherlands as I have a nice trip planned to South Africa... in July!![]()
I hope your info is correct but i have a mountain bike race i wanted to test the 5dm3 on and just wanted the battery life. When i shoot weddings i wont have the grip on, the lighter the better when carrying camera gear all day. I dont really need it but it would be a convenience.iso79 said:I was just at BIC Camera in Shinjuku Japan. They told me the official release date for the grip is April 25th.
Bosman said:Maybe they want to hold off on the battery grips release to get people who need the grip buying the 1dx lol.
Haha i know but dont you think they planned to have it available but something keeps pushing it back???neuroanatomist said:Bosman said:Maybe they want to hold off on the battery grips release to get people who need the grip buying the 1dx lol.
For that to be true, the 1D X would have to actually be available...![]()
thure1982 said:Mt Spokane Photography said:In the past, I've had to remove grips when mounting the body on a tripod, because I could not keep the body still, even with a ordinary non-telephoto lens.
It sounds like you have a weak tripod or head.
I always keep my grip on and with a 200 lens there is no problem mounting the tripod on the grip.
Mt Spokane Photography said:All the Canon Grips were flexible and poorly attached. No way to keep them from moving. Of course, with my same tripod and Wimberly head, my Canon 600mmL / 1D MK III was rock solid.
I was thinking the same thing, no one screws the bottom of their camera into a monopod or a head if their lens outweighs the body. I just dont get the point since the logic doesn't add up.thure1982 said:Mt Spokane Photography said:All the Canon Grips were flexible and poorly attached. No way to keep them from moving. Of course, with my same tripod and Wimberly head, my Canon 600mmL / 1D MK III was rock solid.
But the Wimberly head is made for super-long lenses and is to be attached on the lens for balance. Of course it's solid.
My 40D never had issues with the original grip and the heavy 70-200/2,8 is usm that i had back then.
Are the third party grips better then?