• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Can the 11-24 replace the 17 mm T/S as far as......

Dholai

Canon Rumors Premium
Feb 5, 2014
79
17
2,958
.... the shift function is concerned?

I am guessing "yes" as the image circle has to be much bigger at 11 mm and may be bigger than the 17 mm T/S even at 12 mm.

I use my T/S only to shoot tall structures ( to be honest I have never been able to use the tilt function to my advantage, mainly because of lack of knowledge/expertise). I am thinking that using an 11-24 might be a better idea as metering/ AF capability will be advantageous.

Can someone throw more light on it ?

Thanks

Dholai
 
Dholai said:
.... the shift function is concerned?

I am guessing "yes" as the image circle has to be much bigger at 11 mm and may be bigger than the 17 mm T/S even at 12 mm.

I use my T/S only to shoot tall structures ( to be honest I have never been able to use the tilt function to my advantage, mainly because of lack of knowledge/expertise). I am thinking that using an 11-24 might be a better idea as metering/ AF capability will be advantageous.

Can someone throw more light on it ?

Thanks

Dholai
If you shoot level and crop, yes, but I wouldn't see it was a replacement because you would need to crop 1/3 to 1/2 the frame.
 
Upvote 0
I can't answer the tilt function, but I haven't used my 17mm TS much because:
  • The font element scares me a bit so I don't use it around people too much.
  • I tried to learn the TS features, but every time I learn a bit, I forget by the time I use the lens again.
  • The lack of AF


Dholai said:
.... the shift function is concerned?

I am guessing "yes" as the image circle has to be much bigger at 11 mm and may be bigger than the 17 mm T/S even at 12 mm.

I use my T/S only to shoot tall structures ( to be honest I have never been able to use the tilt function to my advantage, mainly because of lack of knowledge/expertise). I am thinking that using an 11-24 might be a better idea as metering/ AF capability will be advantageous.

Can someone throw more light on it ?

Thanks

Dholai
 
Upvote 0
Here's an example of UWA vs. T/S lenses used for two similar photos. The first photo of Florida's Historic Capitol was shot with the Sigma 12-24 II at 12mm with the camera perfectly level. That meant I didn't need shift and I was able to fit everything in the frame and crop it. The second photo was shot with the TS-E 17 f/4 and shifted. Framing, lighting and other differences aside, I think both photos are definitely workable and you could even add sky in PS to the cropped version if you needed it for editorial purposes.

5DII + Sigma 12-24 II @12mm, f/11, 1/6s, ISO 6400, +1EV - top & bottom cropped - blue hour lighting
i-JdL6VcT-X2.jpg


5DIII + TS-E 17 @ f/16, 1/40s, ISO 800, +1EV - full frame, shifted - golden hour lighting
Wide_Angle_Lens_Shootout_Florida_Capitoll_Test_Lens-_FocalLength-_Aperture-8428_ID-1-XL.jpg
 
Upvote 0
mackguyver said:
Here's an example of UWA vs. T/S lenses used for two similar photos. The first photo of Florida's Historic Capitol was shot with the Sigma 12-24 II at 12mm with the camera perfectly level. That meant I didn't need shift and I was able to fit everything in the frame and crop it. The second photo was shot with the TS-E 17 f/4 and shifted. Framing, lighting and other differences aside, I think both photos are definitely workable and you could even add sky in PS to the cropped version if you needed it for editorial purposes.

5DII + Sigma 12-24 II @12mm, f/11, 1/6s, ISO 6400, +1EV - top & bottom cropped - blue hour lighting
i-JdL6VcT-X2.jpg


5DIII + TS-E 17 @ f/16, 1/40s, ISO 800, +1EV - full frame, shifted - golden hour lighting
Wide_Angle_Lens_Shootout_Florida_Capitoll_Test_Lens-_FocalLength-_Aperture-8428_ID-1-XL.jpg

Great examples. Interesting thought... I think the 11-24 makes a little more sense now that I see this comparison :P
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Mackguyver,

Thank you very much for the examples. This was exactly what I had in my mind.
As far as the tilt function is concerned... well.... I dont remember taking one picture successfully so far where there was a great DOF at f3.5. Just don't know how to do it! :'(

Anyway, I will likely get one for this kind of situations even though I use my 16-35 much less then the 24-70 ! So difficult to compose a landscape in this UWA

Thanks everybody

Dholai
 
Upvote 0