Can the 11-24 replace the 17 mm T/S as far as......

Dholai

CR Pro
Feb 5, 2014
76
15
.... the shift function is concerned?

I am guessing "yes" as the image circle has to be much bigger at 11 mm and may be bigger than the 17 mm T/S even at 12 mm.

I use my T/S only to shoot tall structures ( to be honest I have never been able to use the tilt function to my advantage, mainly because of lack of knowledge/expertise). I am thinking that using an 11-24 might be a better idea as metering/ AF capability will be advantageous.

Can someone throw more light on it ?

Thanks

Dholai
 
Dholai said:
.... the shift function is concerned?

I am guessing "yes" as the image circle has to be much bigger at 11 mm and may be bigger than the 17 mm T/S even at 12 mm.

I use my T/S only to shoot tall structures ( to be honest I have never been able to use the tilt function to my advantage, mainly because of lack of knowledge/expertise). I am thinking that using an 11-24 might be a better idea as metering/ AF capability will be advantageous.

Can someone throw more light on it ?

Thanks

Dholai
If you shoot level and crop, yes, but I wouldn't see it was a replacement because you would need to crop 1/3 to 1/2 the frame.
 
Upvote 0
I can't answer the tilt function, but I haven't used my 17mm TS much because:
  • The font element scares me a bit so I don't use it around people too much.
  • I tried to learn the TS features, but every time I learn a bit, I forget by the time I use the lens again.
  • The lack of AF


Dholai said:
.... the shift function is concerned?

I am guessing "yes" as the image circle has to be much bigger at 11 mm and may be bigger than the 17 mm T/S even at 12 mm.

I use my T/S only to shoot tall structures ( to be honest I have never been able to use the tilt function to my advantage, mainly because of lack of knowledge/expertise). I am thinking that using an 11-24 might be a better idea as metering/ AF capability will be advantageous.

Can someone throw more light on it ?

Thanks

Dholai
 
Upvote 0
Here's an example of UWA vs. T/S lenses used for two similar photos. The first photo of Florida's Historic Capitol was shot with the Sigma 12-24 II at 12mm with the camera perfectly level. That meant I didn't need shift and I was able to fit everything in the frame and crop it. The second photo was shot with the TS-E 17 f/4 and shifted. Framing, lighting and other differences aside, I think both photos are definitely workable and you could even add sky in PS to the cropped version if you needed it for editorial purposes.

5DII + Sigma 12-24 II @12mm, f/11, 1/6s, ISO 6400, +1EV - top & bottom cropped - blue hour lighting
i-JdL6VcT-X2.jpg


5DIII + TS-E 17 @ f/16, 1/40s, ISO 800, +1EV - full frame, shifted - golden hour lighting
Wide_Angle_Lens_Shootout_Florida_Capitoll_Test_Lens-_FocalLength-_Aperture-8428_ID-1-XL.jpg
 
Upvote 0
mackguyver said:
Here's an example of UWA vs. T/S lenses used for two similar photos. The first photo of Florida's Historic Capitol was shot with the Sigma 12-24 II at 12mm with the camera perfectly level. That meant I didn't need shift and I was able to fit everything in the frame and crop it. The second photo was shot with the TS-E 17 f/4 and shifted. Framing, lighting and other differences aside, I think both photos are definitely workable and you could even add sky in PS to the cropped version if you needed it for editorial purposes.

5DII + Sigma 12-24 II @12mm, f/11, 1/6s, ISO 6400, +1EV - top & bottom cropped - blue hour lighting
i-JdL6VcT-X2.jpg


5DIII + TS-E 17 @ f/16, 1/40s, ISO 800, +1EV - full frame, shifted - golden hour lighting
Wide_Angle_Lens_Shootout_Florida_Capitoll_Test_Lens-_FocalLength-_Aperture-8428_ID-1-XL.jpg

Great examples. Interesting thought... I think the 11-24 makes a little more sense now that I see this comparison :p
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0

Dholai

CR Pro
Feb 5, 2014
76
15
Mackguyver,

Thank you very much for the examples. This was exactly what I had in my mind.
As far as the tilt function is concerned... well.... I dont remember taking one picture successfully so far where there was a great DOF at f3.5. Just don't know how to do it! :'(

Anyway, I will likely get one for this kind of situations even though I use my 16-35 much less then the 24-70 ! So difficult to compose a landscape in this UWA

Thanks everybody

Dholai
 
Upvote 0