Viggo said:4 shots out of 12? That is not very assuring.... I hope that's not the best it can do...
I'm sure, with more training and experience, the hit rate will increase...
Upvote
0
Viggo said:4 shots out of 12? That is not very assuring.... I hope that's not the best it can do...
sparda79 said:Viggo said:4 shots out of 12? That is not very assuring.... I hope that's not the best it can do...
I'm sure, with more training and experience, the hit rate will increase...
piotr.c said:sparda79 said:Viggo said:4 shots out of 12? That is not very assuring.... I hope that's not the best it can do...
I'm sure, with more training and experience, the hit rate will increase...
First time with new camera in new type of photography ... I'm pleased with AF and photos![]()
wockawocka said:Viggo said:4 shots out of 12? That is not very assuring.... I hope that's not the best it can do...
Tough crowd.
piotr.c said:All photos were taken with 5D Mark III with 70-200/2.8 L
Ryant said:A few people have asked but you have not mentioned your settings from what I read. Which mode did you use? I found some modes do not seem to track very well at all. I am sure different modes work well for specific times. What mode did you use? Did you alter any of the settings for that mode? What setting did you have your autofocus on? Other than the mode type you can change if it maintains focus more than taking the shot. From what I understand if it cant hit focus in one of the modes it will take a shot anyway, but if you pick the other mode it wont take a shot until it can achieve focus.
Ryan
Marsu42 said:piotr.c said:All photos were taken with 5D Mark III with 70-200/2.8 L
Good pictures (and they should be, considering the price tag of the body+lens) - but of course good postprocessing does add to the general impression. And while I wouldn't want to dispute your talent: It should be a bit frightening to sports photogs that these are the results of a first test of the 5d3 because it means just about anybody can get these results nowadays :-o
Under these lighting conditions, you wouldn't even have needed the increased iso range of the 5d3 - but the 1dx/5d3 af seems to be stallar. I'm wondering: If the 5d3 lost focus and you got bad shots, was it just for a short time or did it screw up completely one time or another?
D_Rochat said:I see what you saying, but I don't think the same results would be achieved by a complete beginner regardless of what camera they used.
D_Rochat said:I imagine if someone gave a beginner a 5D with the proper settings and put them in the right position before telling them to shoot, they might be able to pull it off. The tech is making it easier, but you still can't buy skill![]()
piotr.c said:D_Rochat said:I imagine if someone gave a beginner a 5D with the proper settings and put them in the right position before telling them to shoot, they might be able to pull it off. The tech is making it easier, but you still can't buy skill![]()
Phorography is my hobby for over 15 years (half of my life). People are saying I'm quite qood at this :All I do all the time while shooting is thinking about what is going to happen in next 2-3 seconds. I try to predict action and capture best moments on my photos
It doesn't really matters if I shoot wedding, sports or streetphotography (my favorite!) - rules are the same, only conditions change
The camera itself is just a tool, it should not restrict me any way. With good AF and fast shutter I can focus myself on action. Those photos are 100% frames (with few exceptions). I guess photos are looking nice because I didn't have to fight with camera while shooting
PS. "If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough" ... there is nothing more to say![]()
piotr.c said:Viggo said:4 shots out of 12? That is not very assuring.... I hope that's not the best it can do...
Sometimes 4, sometimes 12 ... try do this with 5D2 :![]()