canon 5ds at www.imaging-resource.com

article mentions comparisons at base ISO: a quick internet search resulted in ambiguous information.

What is the base ISO for the 5Ds? The Nikon 810? At what ISO does it start adding noise?

I was under the impression that GENERALLY you could go up to about 800 before you started adding substantial noise on most of the recent FF cameras...



been curious about this for awhile and have never seen the answer pop up in threads...

thanks
 
Upvote 0
I keep on my computer, Imaginresource.com samples a few years ago and compare again, where is thrown a camera with new sensor technology.

I can say that samples of Canon 5DSR seem to have more sharpness and less noise than Nikon D810. :D
I also realize that 5DSR has NOT geometric artifacts in the contour of the objects, as there is in D810. ;)

It seems to me a true replacement for 1DS Mark iii. :)
 
Upvote 0
IglooEater said:
No RAW at ISO 12,500; JPEG only. That's interesting. Anyone have an explanation for that? To my limited knowledge, any other camera can shoot raw in the extended ISO modes...
That's not the way I read it. I think it means that the multishot NR is only available as JPEG.
 
Upvote 0
lintoni said:
IglooEater said:
No RAW at ISO 12,500; JPEG only. That's interesting. Anyone have an explanation for that? To my limited knowledge, any other camera can shoot raw in the extended ISO modes...
That's not the way I read it. I think it means that the multishot NR is only available as JPEG.
Goodness you're right of course- stupid me! Comes from reading too fast. Thanks for the correction!
 
Upvote 0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
The 645Z is going to blow away everything else, if a high ISO studio or landscape camera was what I needed, I'd be giving it a high priority.


Aye...the quality of the images from that camera are mind blowing. Sharp, but not with artifacts. TONS of detail. Rich deep color, incredible blacks. Not an optical aberration to be seen. Damn. That thing is a landscape photographer's dream.
 
Upvote 0
My thoughts reading through that review... In this order...

1. What a horrible subject for a camera test... Round glass jar full of ill defined cookies? Seriously?
2. 5DS resolution is not looking that impressive. 645Z, now that's impressive.
3. 5DS noise is bad... Worse than the 3 year old 5D3 and worse than D810. It looks like a 7D2.
4. Would not buy a 5DS
5. Next camera might be a Sony.
 
Upvote 0
Am I the only one noticing the D810 green color cast in the shadows whereas the 5D looks more neutral? Possibly thanks to the rumored steeper CFA (and other WB algorithms I guess). From what I've seen so far from this camera, it seems like Canon has prioritized hue accuracy and balance throughout the normal ISO range. Just like the old 1Ds3.
 
Upvote 0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
The 645Z is going to blow away everything else, if a high ISO studio or landscape camera was what I needed, I'd be giving it a high priority.

I think there's no comparison between 645z and 5DsR...dynamic range alone will win hands down.

I have a feeling that this 50MP 5DS will get obsolete or technologically surpassed by competition within a very short period of time. Not improving DR in high MP body is an epic fail.
 
Upvote 0
tomscott said:
Canon Europe have just released this promo with David Noton

https://youtu.be/cgVBqTr-gUQ

Anyone notice David's histogram of the 17 TS-E shot sunlit landscape at 3:37. None of this ETTR nonsense and it makes a good demonstration of how the dynamic range of the camera copes with a scene that has shadow and sunlit clouds in it.
 
Upvote 0