I just checked the (german) wikipedia web site: The highest framerate in progressive mode is 24p for Full HD and it has the 23.796p too. I am not shure if it runs always at 120Hz which is the refresh rate of the pixel content. If the BlueRay player only delivers 24 fps you do not need to update that often because the TFTransistors for the subpixels store their state until the next refresh. But in general there is no argument to restrict a camera to 30 or 60p to avoid 24p because it doesn't look well.
I generally don't pander to the complaints and agree with what you're saying, but I just can't with the giant issue of 1080 @ 24. A dang Rebel T7 can do this... there's zero additional cost to including it in the EOS RP.
Even my old T3i had that feature, both in standard full frame readout and crop mode. The other big feature they removed from video mode this time around was the various exposure modes. Either manual or auto, no aperture or shutter priority.
I just don't get all those excuses and pushing away loyal users out of the Canon brand. Some ppl are well invested into Canon and we are not asking for a rocket science here, nor for features, which would eventually made the camera more expensive. Canon just pushes their product nerfing beyond one's wildest imaginations. Or did YOU expect removal of a feature, which is present on many other lower rank models?
I think you're missing a pair of quotes here: "Sony noise" cancelling headphones
Actually there is. The person who is taking the video may not have the skills to pan or crawl the camera well and the end result may look stuttering on the TV or monitor. Just check Red Pan Calculator that says the time for 24p and 30p or 60p for a given focal length for a smooth panning shot is quite different and if you don't do it right (average video shooters do not get it right) your shot will not look good. 60p and 30p are more forgiving than 24p here.
Yes I agree they should have included it, the main theme of this post was to get Canon to listen. I just buy what I need and from who can provide the product for my needs the best. The market responds to money.
I don't know about a modern TV (haven't used one for a long time), but my notebook's 4K UHD 100% Adobe RGB display is 60 Hz only.
interesting concept: More forgiving for an ENTRY level camera. Maybe 30 is the new 24
If that were the issue, Canon wouldn't have put 24p in the 4k mode of in all the consumer cameras. I agree that not everyone gets it right, and that's why 30 or 60 is normally default. If a videographer or consumer is using enough panning for
Do you have a 5D Mark III? The ML RAW has me holding on to it still, even though I don't daily drive it. Most of the time I shoot with the GH5's 4K for ease of use, but the 5D still outperforms it.
Pretty bold statement. Do you have scientific facts to prove your point or are these just your personal feelings? PS: I would prefer a FF camera with no video at all. There are a multitude of excellent video cameras available. Not so much for stills only cameras. Not sure why people feel that insulting someone in their comments is so fashionable...could it be the anonymity of the internet?
Very poor taste with this comment. If you do not like Canon then move on to something you like and support it.
I doubt anyone wants a $1,300 stills camera to have capacities that enable its use as a Cine camera substitute. The core compliant here is a simple one: Canon should ship cameras that enable users to use standard video frame rates, especially when enabling these frame rates require a costless software adjustment. This is not a frivolous criticism.
Sounds more like Canon doesn't care about you.
That is awesome news for Canon shooters.